Machine learning based eddy current testing: A review

IF 7.9 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Results in Engineering Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103724
Nauman Munir , Jingyuan Huang , Chak-Nam Wong , Sung-Jin Song
{"title":"Machine learning based eddy current testing: A review","authors":"Nauman Munir ,&nbsp;Jingyuan Huang ,&nbsp;Chak-Nam Wong ,&nbsp;Sung-Jin Song","doi":"10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Eddy current testing (ECT) is an established non-destructive evaluation (NDE) technique to evaluate materials. In last decade, machine learning (ML) has revolutionized many areas and ECT is not an exception. The focus of ML in ECT system is to automate some of its analyses for the possible in-situ monitoring of the process and to alleviate the interpretation burden on the operator. The fusion of ML and ECT is not new, however, due to recent advancements in machine learning, there is a need to assess the current potential of ML for ECT systems and identify any gaps and shortcomings for automated data analysis. Thus, this article discusses the findings of a literature survey about the contemporary methods of using machine learning for the automatic analysis of ECT data. The application of machine learning for the ECT system is described in a general workflow manner that begins with data collection and ends with the verification and validation of the performance of ML models. Findings on potential areas of application of the fusion of ML and ECT along with limitations and potential gaps are discussed. This study also identifies the need for common datasets, sample size determination and uncertainty quantification of ML models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36919,"journal":{"name":"Results in Engineering","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 103724"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024019674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eddy current testing (ECT) is an established non-destructive evaluation (NDE) technique to evaluate materials. In last decade, machine learning (ML) has revolutionized many areas and ECT is not an exception. The focus of ML in ECT system is to automate some of its analyses for the possible in-situ monitoring of the process and to alleviate the interpretation burden on the operator. The fusion of ML and ECT is not new, however, due to recent advancements in machine learning, there is a need to assess the current potential of ML for ECT systems and identify any gaps and shortcomings for automated data analysis. Thus, this article discusses the findings of a literature survey about the contemporary methods of using machine learning for the automatic analysis of ECT data. The application of machine learning for the ECT system is described in a general workflow manner that begins with data collection and ends with the verification and validation of the performance of ML models. Findings on potential areas of application of the fusion of ML and ECT along with limitations and potential gaps are discussed. This study also identifies the need for common datasets, sample size determination and uncertainty quantification of ML models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的涡流测试:综述
涡流检测(ECT)是一种成熟的材料无损检测技术。在过去的十年中,机器学习(ML)已经彻底改变了许多领域,ECT也不例外。在ECT系统中,机器学习的重点是自动化一些分析,以便可能的现场监测过程,并减轻操作员的解释负担。机器学习和ECT的融合并不新鲜,然而,由于机器学习的最新进展,有必要评估机器学习在ECT系统中的当前潜力,并确定自动数据分析的差距和缺点。因此,本文讨论了关于使用机器学习进行ECT数据自动分析的当代方法的文献调查结果。机器学习在ECT系统中的应用以一般的工作流程方式描述,从数据收集开始,以ML模型性能的验证和验证结束。本文讨论了ML和ECT融合的潜在应用领域以及局限性和潜在的差距。本研究还确定了对通用数据集、样本大小确定和ML模型不确定度量化的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Results in Engineering
Results in Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
34.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
47 days
期刊最新文献
Meshless Local Petrov–Galerkin Analysis of Hydro elastic Sloshing Frequency Tuning in Type-V Composite Tanks with CFRP Perforated Baffles Study on optimization of layout and timing of destress borehole in excavation roadways A deep learning based model for aluminum agglomeration in solid propellant Development and characterization of post-consumer diaper waste reinforced epoxy composite: A circular economy approach to municipal solid waste management YOLOv8n-3SE-PD: A lightweight model for small object detection in smart vehicle edge sensing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1