A decision-making framework for prioritizing reconstruction projects in post-disaster recovery

IF 6 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Results in Engineering Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103693
Ahmed Wajeh Mushtaha, Wesam Salah Alaloul, Abdullah O. Baarimah, Muhammad Ali Musarat, Khalid Mhmoud Alzubi, Abdul Mateen Khan
{"title":"A decision-making framework for prioritizing reconstruction projects in post-disaster recovery","authors":"Ahmed Wajeh Mushtaha,&nbsp;Wesam Salah Alaloul,&nbsp;Abdullah O. Baarimah,&nbsp;Muhammad Ali Musarat,&nbsp;Khalid Mhmoud Alzubi,&nbsp;Abdul Mateen Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Disaster recovery requires urgent but thoughtful decision-making in the face of scarce resources, making it essential to prioritize projects that will strengthen community resilience and functionality. Disasters, defined as sudden, catastrophic events that disrupt the functioning of communities and cause significant human, material, economic, or environmental losses, create a pressing need for effective prioritization. Effective prioritization considers structural integrity, safety, economic viability, social impact, and environmental sustainability. However, a systematic framework to guide resource prioritization in post-disaster recovery is lacking. To address the gap in systematic prioritization, this research aims to develop a clear framework that guides post-disaster rebuilders in the efficient allocation of scarce resources based on resilience and equity principles. Results were achieved by investigating a total of 273 experts in post-disaster reconstruction, with 62 % possessing over ten years of experience. Top findings indicate that structural integrity and functionality are the most important. In addition, safety considerations in terms of immediate access for responders (85.0 %) are crucial, along with social requirements, including the impacts on affected populations (85.9 %) and vulnerable groups (77.7 %).Economic considerations prioritize funding availability (76.8 %) and resource access (70.6 %), while environmental concerns highlight public health impacts (82.6 %) and environmental hazards (81.1 %). The findings emphasize the need for the development of a holistic, evidence-based prioritization smart system that will balance immediate recovery needs with long-term resilience objectives. Those actionable insights aim to support policymakers and practitioners to discussions on how strategic resource allocation may help build resilience and ensure adequate, equitable recovery in disaster-stricken areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36919,"journal":{"name":"Results in Engineering","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 103693"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024019364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disaster recovery requires urgent but thoughtful decision-making in the face of scarce resources, making it essential to prioritize projects that will strengthen community resilience and functionality. Disasters, defined as sudden, catastrophic events that disrupt the functioning of communities and cause significant human, material, economic, or environmental losses, create a pressing need for effective prioritization. Effective prioritization considers structural integrity, safety, economic viability, social impact, and environmental sustainability. However, a systematic framework to guide resource prioritization in post-disaster recovery is lacking. To address the gap in systematic prioritization, this research aims to develop a clear framework that guides post-disaster rebuilders in the efficient allocation of scarce resources based on resilience and equity principles. Results were achieved by investigating a total of 273 experts in post-disaster reconstruction, with 62 % possessing over ten years of experience. Top findings indicate that structural integrity and functionality are the most important. In addition, safety considerations in terms of immediate access for responders (85.0 %) are crucial, along with social requirements, including the impacts on affected populations (85.9 %) and vulnerable groups (77.7 %).Economic considerations prioritize funding availability (76.8 %) and resource access (70.6 %), while environmental concerns highlight public health impacts (82.6 %) and environmental hazards (81.1 %). The findings emphasize the need for the development of a holistic, evidence-based prioritization smart system that will balance immediate recovery needs with long-term resilience objectives. Those actionable insights aim to support policymakers and practitioners to discussions on how strategic resource allocation may help build resilience and ensure adequate, equitable recovery in disaster-stricken areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Results in Engineering
Results in Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
34.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
47 days
期刊最新文献
Environmental occurrence, hazards, and remediation strategies for the removal of cadmium from the polluted environment Effect of fabrication techniques of high entropy alloys: A review with integration of machine learning An overview on the carbon deposited during dry reforming of methane (DRM): Its formation, deposition, identification, and quantification Recent developments in solar water heaters and solar collectors: A review on experimental and neural network analyses Influence of the typical twisted tape inserts into the inner tube of double-pipe heat exchanger: A limited review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1