A decision-making framework for prioritizing reconstruction projects in post-disaster recovery

IF 7.9 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Results in Engineering Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103693
Ahmed Wajeh Mushtaha, Wesam Salah Alaloul, Abdullah O. Baarimah, Muhammad Ali Musarat, Khalid Mhmoud Alzubi, Abdul Mateen Khan
{"title":"A decision-making framework for prioritizing reconstruction projects in post-disaster recovery","authors":"Ahmed Wajeh Mushtaha,&nbsp;Wesam Salah Alaloul,&nbsp;Abdullah O. Baarimah,&nbsp;Muhammad Ali Musarat,&nbsp;Khalid Mhmoud Alzubi,&nbsp;Abdul Mateen Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Disaster recovery requires urgent but thoughtful decision-making in the face of scarce resources, making it essential to prioritize projects that will strengthen community resilience and functionality. Disasters, defined as sudden, catastrophic events that disrupt the functioning of communities and cause significant human, material, economic, or environmental losses, create a pressing need for effective prioritization. Effective prioritization considers structural integrity, safety, economic viability, social impact, and environmental sustainability. However, a systematic framework to guide resource prioritization in post-disaster recovery is lacking. To address the gap in systematic prioritization, this research aims to develop a clear framework that guides post-disaster rebuilders in the efficient allocation of scarce resources based on resilience and equity principles. Results were achieved by investigating a total of 273 experts in post-disaster reconstruction, with 62 % possessing over ten years of experience. Top findings indicate that structural integrity and functionality are the most important. In addition, safety considerations in terms of immediate access for responders (85.0 %) are crucial, along with social requirements, including the impacts on affected populations (85.9 %) and vulnerable groups (77.7 %).Economic considerations prioritize funding availability (76.8 %) and resource access (70.6 %), while environmental concerns highlight public health impacts (82.6 %) and environmental hazards (81.1 %). The findings emphasize the need for the development of a holistic, evidence-based prioritization smart system that will balance immediate recovery needs with long-term resilience objectives. Those actionable insights aim to support policymakers and practitioners to discussions on how strategic resource allocation may help build resilience and ensure adequate, equitable recovery in disaster-stricken areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36919,"journal":{"name":"Results in Engineering","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 103693"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024019364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disaster recovery requires urgent but thoughtful decision-making in the face of scarce resources, making it essential to prioritize projects that will strengthen community resilience and functionality. Disasters, defined as sudden, catastrophic events that disrupt the functioning of communities and cause significant human, material, economic, or environmental losses, create a pressing need for effective prioritization. Effective prioritization considers structural integrity, safety, economic viability, social impact, and environmental sustainability. However, a systematic framework to guide resource prioritization in post-disaster recovery is lacking. To address the gap in systematic prioritization, this research aims to develop a clear framework that guides post-disaster rebuilders in the efficient allocation of scarce resources based on resilience and equity principles. Results were achieved by investigating a total of 273 experts in post-disaster reconstruction, with 62 % possessing over ten years of experience. Top findings indicate that structural integrity and functionality are the most important. In addition, safety considerations in terms of immediate access for responders (85.0 %) are crucial, along with social requirements, including the impacts on affected populations (85.9 %) and vulnerable groups (77.7 %).Economic considerations prioritize funding availability (76.8 %) and resource access (70.6 %), while environmental concerns highlight public health impacts (82.6 %) and environmental hazards (81.1 %). The findings emphasize the need for the development of a holistic, evidence-based prioritization smart system that will balance immediate recovery needs with long-term resilience objectives. Those actionable insights aim to support policymakers and practitioners to discussions on how strategic resource allocation may help build resilience and ensure adequate, equitable recovery in disaster-stricken areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灾后恢复重建项目优先次序的决策框架
在资源稀缺的情况下,灾难恢复需要紧急但深思熟虑的决策,因此必须优先考虑能够增强社区恢复力和功能的项目。灾害被定义为破坏社区功能并造成重大人员、物质、经济或环境损失的突发灾难性事件,因此迫切需要有效地确定优先次序。有效的优先考虑结构完整性、安全性、经济可行性、社会影响和环境可持续性。然而,缺乏一个指导灾后恢复资源优先次序的系统框架。为了解决系统优先排序方面的差距,本研究旨在制定一个明确的框架,指导灾后重建者基于复原力和公平原则有效分配稀缺资源。调查结果是通过调查273名灾后重建专家得出的,其中62%的专家拥有十年以上的经验。研究结果表明,结构完整性和功能性是最重要的。此外,安全方面的考虑(85.0%)对响应者的即时访问至关重要,以及社会要求,包括对受影响人群(85.9%)和弱势群体(77.7%)的影响。经济方面的考虑优先考虑资金供应(76.8%)和资源获取(70.6%),而环境方面的考虑则强调公共卫生影响(82.6%)和环境危害(81.1%)。研究结果强调需要开发一个全面的、以证据为基础的优先级智能系统,以平衡当前的恢复需求和长期的恢复目标。这些可付诸行动的见解旨在支持政策制定者和从业者讨论战略资源分配如何有助于建立复原力并确保受灾地区充分、公平的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Results in Engineering
Results in Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
34.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
47 days
期刊最新文献
Meshless Local Petrov–Galerkin Analysis of Hydro elastic Sloshing Frequency Tuning in Type-V Composite Tanks with CFRP Perforated Baffles Study on optimization of layout and timing of destress borehole in excavation roadways A deep learning based model for aluminum agglomeration in solid propellant Development and characterization of post-consumer diaper waste reinforced epoxy composite: A circular economy approach to municipal solid waste management YOLOv8n-3SE-PD: A lightweight model for small object detection in smart vehicle edge sensing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1