Digestibility of protein and estimated bioavailability of mineral compounds in plant-based yoghurt alternatives

IF 7.2 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Future Foods Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100545
Anastassia Zeinatulina , Kristel Tanilas , Kristel Ehala-Aleksejev , Ene Viiard , Tiina Kriščiunaite
{"title":"Digestibility of protein and estimated bioavailability of mineral compounds in plant-based yoghurt alternatives","authors":"Anastassia Zeinatulina ,&nbsp;Kristel Tanilas ,&nbsp;Kristel Ehala-Aleksejev ,&nbsp;Ene Viiard ,&nbsp;Tiina Kriščiunaite","doi":"10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluated the nutritional quality of 25 commercial plant-based (PB) yoghurt alternatives (lupin-, soya-, oat-, coconut-based), focusing on protein digestibility and amino acid score and the content of the essential minerals calcium, iron, magnesium, and zinc. The phytates levels were also measured to estimate mineral bioavailability. The content of saponins was examined in soya and oat products. The findings of this study revealed a high variability of Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) within product groups, with values ranging from 0.21 to 0.82 for soya-based yoghurt alternatives and from 0.41 to 1.00 for oat-based yoghurt alternatives. Only one oat product exhibited high-quality protein (PDCAAS &gt; 0.9). Most products had low mineral content, which makes them unsuitable as a mineral source. Phytates hindered the low mineral content, with levels ranging from 13 to 193 mg/100 g. However, products enriched with calcium showed satisfactory levels, and phytate content had minimal impact on the estimated calcium bioavailability. Oat- and soya-based products contained 1–8 mg/100 g of avenacosides and 11–18 mg/100 g soyasaponins, respectively. This research underscores the importance of paying more attention to the nutritional value during product development of PB yoghurt alternatives manufactured using various constituents and when incorporating these products into dairy-free diets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34474,"journal":{"name":"Future Foods","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100545"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833525000085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the nutritional quality of 25 commercial plant-based (PB) yoghurt alternatives (lupin-, soya-, oat-, coconut-based), focusing on protein digestibility and amino acid score and the content of the essential minerals calcium, iron, magnesium, and zinc. The phytates levels were also measured to estimate mineral bioavailability. The content of saponins was examined in soya and oat products. The findings of this study revealed a high variability of Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) within product groups, with values ranging from 0.21 to 0.82 for soya-based yoghurt alternatives and from 0.41 to 1.00 for oat-based yoghurt alternatives. Only one oat product exhibited high-quality protein (PDCAAS > 0.9). Most products had low mineral content, which makes them unsuitable as a mineral source. Phytates hindered the low mineral content, with levels ranging from 13 to 193 mg/100 g. However, products enriched with calcium showed satisfactory levels, and phytate content had minimal impact on the estimated calcium bioavailability. Oat- and soya-based products contained 1–8 mg/100 g of avenacosides and 11–18 mg/100 g soyasaponins, respectively. This research underscores the importance of paying more attention to the nutritional value during product development of PB yoghurt alternatives manufactured using various constituents and when incorporating these products into dairy-free diets.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future Foods
Future Foods Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Foods is a specialized journal that is dedicated to tackling the challenges posed by climate change and the need for sustainability in the realm of food production. The journal recognizes the imperative to transform current food manufacturing and consumption practices to meet the dietary needs of a burgeoning global population while simultaneously curbing environmental degradation. The mission of Future Foods is to disseminate research that aligns with the goal of fostering the development of innovative technologies and alternative food sources to establish more sustainable food systems. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed articles that contribute to the advancement of sustainable food practices. Abstracting and indexing: Scopus Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) SNIP
期刊最新文献
Bacterial nanocellulose and its oxidized form as functional carriers for pomegranate peel extract: A sustainable approach to bioactive delivery Increasing food sustainability by utilization of biowaste to grow mealworms and their nutrient profile as human food Microalgal proteins as ingredients for creating dairy mimetic products: Prospects for substituting bovine milk proteins Physical and functional characterization of whey protein-lignin biocomposite films for food packaging applications The forgotten factor: Exploring consumer perceptions of artificial intelligence in the food and agriculture systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1