Gender and development in the agrarian south

IF 4.8 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES World Development Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106876
Lyn Ossome
{"title":"Gender and development in the agrarian south","authors":"Lyn Ossome","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A central question posed by the still largely peasant populations of the global south is the feasibility of reproducing a model of development which in advanced capitalist economies, settled the classical agrarian question through the transfer and application of organizational models derived from large-scale industry to agriculture, and in favor of a minority of their populations. In the global south, the transplanting of this development model has been characterized by the dominance of large-scale corporate capital and financial monopolies in agriculture, a structure that jeopardizes the future of family farming, food sovereignty, and agroecological sustainability. The result has been massive loss of arable land, deepening precarity and exploitation of labor, disintegration of indigenous food systems, and the commodification of nature. Such (under)developmental logics directly affect processes of social reproduction here, in part because agrarian livelihoods remain central to the survival of the majority in the global south. Contrary to prevailing neoliberal logic, these outcomes actually reassert the continued relevance of land and the peasantry, and raise new or contemporary agrarian questions, among which gender (gendered labor) is central. The chapter links these concerns through an examination of the structures, trajectories and gendered outcomes of capitalist development in the agrarian south, with the aim also of outlining a feminist decolonial critique of economic development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48463,"journal":{"name":"World Development","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 106876"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X24003474","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A central question posed by the still largely peasant populations of the global south is the feasibility of reproducing a model of development which in advanced capitalist economies, settled the classical agrarian question through the transfer and application of organizational models derived from large-scale industry to agriculture, and in favor of a minority of their populations. In the global south, the transplanting of this development model has been characterized by the dominance of large-scale corporate capital and financial monopolies in agriculture, a structure that jeopardizes the future of family farming, food sovereignty, and agroecological sustainability. The result has been massive loss of arable land, deepening precarity and exploitation of labor, disintegration of indigenous food systems, and the commodification of nature. Such (under)developmental logics directly affect processes of social reproduction here, in part because agrarian livelihoods remain central to the survival of the majority in the global south. Contrary to prevailing neoliberal logic, these outcomes actually reassert the continued relevance of land and the peasantry, and raise new or contemporary agrarian questions, among which gender (gendered labor) is central. The chapter links these concerns through an examination of the structures, trajectories and gendered outcomes of capitalist development in the agrarian south, with the aim also of outlining a feminist decolonial critique of economic development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南方农业的性别与发展
全球南方仍以农民为主的人口所提出的一个中心问题是,在发达资本主义经济中,复制一种发展模式的可行性,这种模式通过将源自大工业的组织模式转移和应用于农业,并有利于少数人口,解决了经典的农业问题。在全球南方,这种发展模式的移植以大规模企业资本和农业金融垄断为特征,这种结构危及家庭农业、粮食主权和农业生态可持续性的未来。其结果是可耕地的大量流失,劳动力的不稳定性和剥削加剧,土著粮食系统的瓦解,以及自然的商品化。这种(欠)发展逻辑直接影响了这里的社会再生产过程,部分原因是农业生计仍然是全球南方大多数人生存的核心。与流行的新自由主义逻辑相反,这些结果实际上重申了土地和农民的持续相关性,并提出了新的或当代的农业问题,其中性别(性别劳动)是核心。本章通过对农业南方资本主义发展的结构、轨迹和性别结果的考察,将这些问题联系起来,目的还在于概述女性主义对经济发展的非殖民化批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Development
World Development Multiple-
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
320
期刊介绍: World Development is a multi-disciplinary monthly journal of development studies. It seeks to explore ways of improving standards of living, and the human condition generally, by examining potential solutions to problems such as: poverty, unemployment, malnutrition, disease, lack of shelter, environmental degradation, inadequate scientific and technological resources, trade and payments imbalances, international debt, gender and ethnic discrimination, militarism and civil conflict, and lack of popular participation in economic and political life. Contributions offer constructive ideas and analysis, and highlight the lessons to be learned from the experiences of different nations, societies, and economies.
期刊最新文献
The double-edged impact of e-commerce participation on farm’s Income: Evidence from China Reinventing reproductive labor: childcare in rural China under collectivization (1956–1961) Substitute or complement? Quantity–quality effects of agricultural production diversity and market access on diets Rebuilding after disaster in Haiti: effects of expecting external, diaspora, and local support Exploring synergistic pathways between urbanization, water use efficiency, and renewable energy adoption in enhancing food security in Sub-Saharan Africa: A causal analysis using temporal causal modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1