Different contemporary resin cements for intracanal luting of glass fiber posts - Bonding and polymerization assessments

IF 3.2 3区 材料科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2025.103951
Anna Caroliny Detogni , Vitaliano Gomes de Araújo Neto , Caio Felipe de Almeida Nobre , Victor Pinheiro Feitosa , Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti
{"title":"Different contemporary resin cements for intracanal luting of glass fiber posts - Bonding and polymerization assessments","authors":"Anna Caroliny Detogni ,&nbsp;Vitaliano Gomes de Araújo Neto ,&nbsp;Caio Felipe de Almeida Nobre ,&nbsp;Victor Pinheiro Feitosa ,&nbsp;Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti","doi":"10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2025.103951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluated the push-out bond strength (POBS) and the degree of conversion (DC) of contemporary resin cements employed for the luting of glass fiber posts, considering different root thirds and thermocycling aging. One hundred bovine incisors were assigned to five groups (n = 20): Universal resin cements (URCs) - Duo-link Universal, NX3 and RelyX Universal; Traditional adhesive resin cement (ARC) - RelyX Ultimate; and one self-etching resin cement (SERC) - Panavia V5. After luting glass fiber posts to intraradicular dentin, specimens were cut, and POBS was tested at 24h or after 10,000 thermocyclers. Failure modes were analyzed using a stereomicroscope. The degree of conversion (n = 3) was measured using Micro-Raman spectroscopy. Data were statistically analyzed by two-way (POBS) or one-way (DC) ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). RelyX Universal and Duo-link Universal showed higher POBS than further cements at 24h and after thermocycling (p = 0.00644). Panavia V5 showed the lowest POBS. Coronal and middle thirds showed the highest POBS mean values for all resin cements, except for Panavia V5, which depicted similar bonding along all root thirds (p = 0.04571). Adhesive (cement-dentin) and mixed failures were the most prevalent for all groups. The coronal third showed the highest DC for all cements, and Panavia V5 depicted the lowest conversion, mainly in the apical third. This study demonstrated that the URCs may surpass traditional resin cement for luting glass fiber posts, but with similar polymerization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13732,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 103951"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143749625000181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the push-out bond strength (POBS) and the degree of conversion (DC) of contemporary resin cements employed for the luting of glass fiber posts, considering different root thirds and thermocycling aging. One hundred bovine incisors were assigned to five groups (n = 20): Universal resin cements (URCs) - Duo-link Universal, NX3 and RelyX Universal; Traditional adhesive resin cement (ARC) - RelyX Ultimate; and one self-etching resin cement (SERC) - Panavia V5. After luting glass fiber posts to intraradicular dentin, specimens were cut, and POBS was tested at 24h or after 10,000 thermocyclers. Failure modes were analyzed using a stereomicroscope. The degree of conversion (n = 3) was measured using Micro-Raman spectroscopy. Data were statistically analyzed by two-way (POBS) or one-way (DC) ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). RelyX Universal and Duo-link Universal showed higher POBS than further cements at 24h and after thermocycling (p = 0.00644). Panavia V5 showed the lowest POBS. Coronal and middle thirds showed the highest POBS mean values for all resin cements, except for Panavia V5, which depicted similar bonding along all root thirds (p = 0.04571). Adhesive (cement-dentin) and mixed failures were the most prevalent for all groups. The coronal third showed the highest DC for all cements, and Panavia V5 depicted the lowest conversion, mainly in the apical third. This study demonstrated that the URCs may surpass traditional resin cement for luting glass fiber posts, but with similar polymerization.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
200
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives draws together the many aspects of the science and technology of adhesive materials, from fundamental research and development work to industrial applications. Subject areas covered include: interfacial interactions, surface chemistry, methods of testing, accumulation of test data on physical and mechanical properties, environmental effects, new adhesive materials, sealants, design of bonded joints, and manufacturing technology.
期刊最新文献
How can calcium silicate-based sealers impact the mineral phase of root dentin after the use of intracanal medications? A chemical and spectroscopic analysis Effect of the joining temperature on the tensile–shear mechanical properties of clinch-adhesive joints in steel and aluminum alloy sheets n-hexane influence on canola oil adhesion and volumetric properties Impact of thermal and humidity conditions on structural epoxy adhesives during medium-term exposure Sericin and gentamicin-enhanced polyurethane-acrylate adhesives for superior adhesion, biocompatibility and antibacterial property
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1