{"title":"Decolonizing development economics: A critique of the late neoclassical reason","authors":"Yahya M. Madra , Bengi Akbulut , Fikret Adaman","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we scrutinize contemporary development economics to render visible the colonial impulses that lead to forms of silencing and disavowal of economic differences in ontological and epistemological terms. As decolonizing <em>economies</em> and decolonizing <em>economics</em> are interwoven, we open our discussion with a history of decolonization efforts at the level of the political economy to form a background for the discussion of the ontological and epistemological issues on the coloniality of development economics. We then first engage with neoclassical economics and its antecedents in classical political economy—the orthodox and hegemonic stream in the discipline of economics—highlighting how its individualistic and mechanistic nature implicates the discipline with the coloniality of knowledge production, and second, unpack the current state of mainstream development economics after the late neoclassical turn (incorporating to standard economic models the problems emanating from market failures, cognitive biases, and multiple equilibria) in the discipline by focusing on two of its prominent research agendas: new institutional economics of development divergence, and the poor economics of development. Finally, we formulate some perspectives for decolonial development economics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48463,"journal":{"name":"World Development","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 106875"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X24003462","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, we scrutinize contemporary development economics to render visible the colonial impulses that lead to forms of silencing and disavowal of economic differences in ontological and epistemological terms. As decolonizing economies and decolonizing economics are interwoven, we open our discussion with a history of decolonization efforts at the level of the political economy to form a background for the discussion of the ontological and epistemological issues on the coloniality of development economics. We then first engage with neoclassical economics and its antecedents in classical political economy—the orthodox and hegemonic stream in the discipline of economics—highlighting how its individualistic and mechanistic nature implicates the discipline with the coloniality of knowledge production, and second, unpack the current state of mainstream development economics after the late neoclassical turn (incorporating to standard economic models the problems emanating from market failures, cognitive biases, and multiple equilibria) in the discipline by focusing on two of its prominent research agendas: new institutional economics of development divergence, and the poor economics of development. Finally, we formulate some perspectives for decolonial development economics.
期刊介绍:
World Development is a multi-disciplinary monthly journal of development studies. It seeks to explore ways of improving standards of living, and the human condition generally, by examining potential solutions to problems such as: poverty, unemployment, malnutrition, disease, lack of shelter, environmental degradation, inadequate scientific and technological resources, trade and payments imbalances, international debt, gender and ethnic discrimination, militarism and civil conflict, and lack of popular participation in economic and political life. Contributions offer constructive ideas and analysis, and highlight the lessons to be learned from the experiences of different nations, societies, and economies.