The impact of the “Full Liberalization of Household Registration” policy on the free migration of rural labor

IF 5.5 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS 中国经济评论 Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102330
Shan Hu, Nan Jia
{"title":"The impact of the “Full Liberalization of Household Registration” policy on the free migration of rural labor","authors":"Shan Hu,&nbsp;Nan Jia","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study compiles and analyzes household registration reform policy documents from 283 prefectural-level cities in China, constructing a policy variable for “full liberalization of household registration.” This variable is then matched with individual-level data from the China Household Finance Survey. Employing a Regression Discontinuity Difference-in-Differences (RD-DID) approach, this study identify the causal effect of the “full liberalization of household registration” on rural labor migration decisions. The study finds that the policy significantly increases the migration of rural labor, reduces return migration, promotes the accompanying migration of family members (elderly and children) and increases the rate of family migration, and alleviates the problems of elderly and left-behind. However, the effect of short-distance mobility is more substantial than that of long-distance mobility. The results of the mechanism analysis show that the policy does not raise labor force income(but may decrease it), but promotes the comprehensive sharing of basic public services such as education and healthcare among the migrants, an important factor driving labor migration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102330"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24002190","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compiles and analyzes household registration reform policy documents from 283 prefectural-level cities in China, constructing a policy variable for “full liberalization of household registration.” This variable is then matched with individual-level data from the China Household Finance Survey. Employing a Regression Discontinuity Difference-in-Differences (RD-DID) approach, this study identify the causal effect of the “full liberalization of household registration” on rural labor migration decisions. The study finds that the policy significantly increases the migration of rural labor, reduces return migration, promotes the accompanying migration of family members (elderly and children) and increases the rate of family migration, and alleviates the problems of elderly and left-behind. However, the effect of short-distance mobility is more substantial than that of long-distance mobility. The results of the mechanism analysis show that the policy does not raise labor force income(but may decrease it), but promotes the comprehensive sharing of basic public services such as education and healthcare among the migrants, an important factor driving labor migration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“全面放开户籍”政策对农村劳动力自由流动的影响
本研究对中国283个地级市的户籍改革政策文件进行了汇总分析,构建了“全面放开户籍”的政策变量。然后将该变量与中国家庭金融调查的个人层面数据相匹配。本研究采用回归非连续性差中差(RD-DID)方法,确定了“全面放开户籍”对农村劳动力迁移决策的因果影响。研究发现,该政策显著增加了农村劳动力的迁移,减少了返乡人口,促进了家庭成员(老人和孩子)的伴随迁移,提高了家庭迁移率,缓解了老年人和留守人口问题。然而,短途迁移的影响比长途迁移的影响更大。机制分析结果表明,政策并未提高劳动力收入(但可能降低劳动力收入),但促进了教育、医疗等基本公共服务在流动人口中的全面共享,是推动劳动力迁移的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国经济评论
中国经济评论 ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.40%
发文量
380
期刊介绍: The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.
期刊最新文献
A proposition of lose-lose: Detrimental consequences of trade wars Transparency matters: Public vs. non-public use of the counter-cyclical factor and renminbi exchange rate volatility How digital firms shape innovation networks: Evidence from corporate patent citations Early-life adversity and e-commerce adoption in old age: Evidence from China’s Great Famine Information-based resilience: Credit line disclosure as strategic response to natural disasters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1