Safety regulations and firm productivity

IF 5.2 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS 中国经济评论 Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102335
Xiaowei Chen , Zhilin Hu , Liguo Lin
{"title":"Safety regulations and firm productivity","authors":"Xiaowei Chen ,&nbsp;Zhilin Hu ,&nbsp;Liguo Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate the effects of safety regulations on the Total Factor Productivity (TFP) and overall performance of firms. We focus on the industrial safety regulation—the Decision on Further Strengthening Work Safety—implemented in 2004 to address the frequent occurrence of industrial accidents. Industrial safety accidents, due to their potential for causing significant casualties, substantial social impact, and clear accountability in a short timeframe, often receive heightened attention from local government officials, in contrast with environmental pollution incidents. We discovered that safety regulations notably decrease the TFP of firms. Their overall output, profits, export volumes, and other aspects of business performance, including financing costs, are adversely affected. Additionally, innovation initiatives and the number of new entrants also significantly declined. Firms respond to increased costs by reducing labor input, but there is no change in capital input. Furthermore, the study contrasts the differing impacts of industrial safety accidents and environmental pollution incidents. Despite the negative effects of the safety regulations on TFP as well as other economic outcomes, there are social welfare gains caused by the safety regulations. This research provides insights into the interplay between social governance and corporate development. It suggests that when the government engages in necessary social governance, it should provide targeted policy support to offset the negative effects on business operations and create a more favorable business environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102335"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24002244","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate the effects of safety regulations on the Total Factor Productivity (TFP) and overall performance of firms. We focus on the industrial safety regulation—the Decision on Further Strengthening Work Safety—implemented in 2004 to address the frequent occurrence of industrial accidents. Industrial safety accidents, due to their potential for causing significant casualties, substantial social impact, and clear accountability in a short timeframe, often receive heightened attention from local government officials, in contrast with environmental pollution incidents. We discovered that safety regulations notably decrease the TFP of firms. Their overall output, profits, export volumes, and other aspects of business performance, including financing costs, are adversely affected. Additionally, innovation initiatives and the number of new entrants also significantly declined. Firms respond to increased costs by reducing labor input, but there is no change in capital input. Furthermore, the study contrasts the differing impacts of industrial safety accidents and environmental pollution incidents. Despite the negative effects of the safety regulations on TFP as well as other economic outcomes, there are social welfare gains caused by the safety regulations. This research provides insights into the interplay between social governance and corporate development. It suggests that when the government engages in necessary social governance, it should provide targeted policy support to offset the negative effects on business operations and create a more favorable business environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国经济评论
中国经济评论 ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.40%
发文量
380
期刊介绍: The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.
期刊最新文献
The green promise of digital finance: Exploring its effects and mechanisms on carbon reduction China's aid-giving modalities: Impacts on sustainable growth in China-Africa trade Productivity implications of inefficient environmental regulation: Evidence from China Broadband internet and income inequality among the floating population: Evidence from the “broadband China” strategy in China Unlocking the dual benefits: Economic and ecological impacts of China's National Key Ecological Function Areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1