Comparative radiological impact of LOCA and RDD scenarios: An AI-enhanced assessment using HotSpot code

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Nuclear Engineering and Design Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113808
Najeeb N.M. Maglas , Merouane Najar , Zhao Qiang , Mohsen M.M. Ali , Ahmed AL-Osta , M. Salah Alwarqi , Djebara Lilia , Alaa Fadul
{"title":"Comparative radiological impact of LOCA and RDD scenarios: An AI-enhanced assessment using HotSpot code","authors":"Najeeb N.M. Maglas ,&nbsp;Merouane Najar ,&nbsp;Zhao Qiang ,&nbsp;Mohsen M.M. Ali ,&nbsp;Ahmed AL-Osta ,&nbsp;M. Salah Alwarqi ,&nbsp;Djebara Lilia ,&nbsp;Alaa Fadul","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study provides a comprehensive radiological assessment of two hypothetical incidents: a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) at a nuclear reactor and a Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD) detonation, both simulated in Dhamar City, Yemen, using the HotSpot Health Physics Code. We evaluated the dispersion of radioactive materials under consistent atmospheric conditions to assess their environmental and human health impacts. Our analysis was based on two parameters: sampling time and exposure duration. For sampling time, the Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) was measured at specific intervals. After 2000 min, the TEDE for LOCA was 47 Sv, significantly higher than 0.0033 Sv for the RDD within a 1 km<sup>2</sup> area. In the initial moments of the explosion, the doses were 340 Sv for LOCA and 0.042 Sv for RDD, showing a dramatic decrease over time. For exposure duration, the LOCA scenario, results in a TEDE of 150 Sv after one year. In contrast, the RDD leads to a TEDE of 0.17 Sv after the same period. The LOCA scenario results in higher radiation doses due to multiple radionuclides with varying decay rates, causing a rapid increase in dose. In contrast, the RDD scenario shows a slower dose accumulation due to the long half-life of <sup>137</sup>Cs. This study introduces an AI-enhanced approach to radiological assessments of LOCA and RDD incidents, using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model comprised of classification and regression sub-models. The classification sub-model accurately identifies the nature of the radiation event, while the regression sub-model estimates the distance of the explosion within 80 km radius from the explosion epicenter. With a predictive accuracy of 100 % in classification and over 99 % in regression, the model significantly improves the effectiveness and speed of emergency response strategies, offering critical advancements in radiological safety measures. The impact on human organs was more severe in LOCA, with doses to the liver, skin, lungs, thyroid gland, brain, and kidneys exceeding those from the RDD by factors ranging from 55 to 6000. The findings stress the need for strong safety measures, long-term monitoring, and preparedness, especially in regions like Yemen, while highlighting the potential long-term environmental and health impacts of nuclear incidents and the importance of effective response and recovery plans.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"432 ","pages":"Article 113808"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549324009087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive radiological assessment of two hypothetical incidents: a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) at a nuclear reactor and a Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD) detonation, both simulated in Dhamar City, Yemen, using the HotSpot Health Physics Code. We evaluated the dispersion of radioactive materials under consistent atmospheric conditions to assess their environmental and human health impacts. Our analysis was based on two parameters: sampling time and exposure duration. For sampling time, the Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) was measured at specific intervals. After 2000 min, the TEDE for LOCA was 47 Sv, significantly higher than 0.0033 Sv for the RDD within a 1 km2 area. In the initial moments of the explosion, the doses were 340 Sv for LOCA and 0.042 Sv for RDD, showing a dramatic decrease over time. For exposure duration, the LOCA scenario, results in a TEDE of 150 Sv after one year. In contrast, the RDD leads to a TEDE of 0.17 Sv after the same period. The LOCA scenario results in higher radiation doses due to multiple radionuclides with varying decay rates, causing a rapid increase in dose. In contrast, the RDD scenario shows a slower dose accumulation due to the long half-life of 137Cs. This study introduces an AI-enhanced approach to radiological assessments of LOCA and RDD incidents, using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model comprised of classification and regression sub-models. The classification sub-model accurately identifies the nature of the radiation event, while the regression sub-model estimates the distance of the explosion within 80 km radius from the explosion epicenter. With a predictive accuracy of 100 % in classification and over 99 % in regression, the model significantly improves the effectiveness and speed of emergency response strategies, offering critical advancements in radiological safety measures. The impact on human organs was more severe in LOCA, with doses to the liver, skin, lungs, thyroid gland, brain, and kidneys exceeding those from the RDD by factors ranging from 55 to 6000. The findings stress the need for strong safety measures, long-term monitoring, and preparedness, especially in regions like Yemen, while highlighting the potential long-term environmental and health impacts of nuclear incidents and the importance of effective response and recovery plans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Nuclear Engineering and Design 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
377
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology. Fundamentals of Reactor Design include: • Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics • Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA) • Structural and Mechanical Engineering • Materials Science • Fuel Behavior and Design • Structural Plant Design • Engineering of Reactor Components • Experiments Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered: • Accident Mitigation Measures • Reactor Control Systems • Licensing Issues • Safeguard Engineering • Economy of Plants • Reprocessing / Waste Disposal • Applications of Nuclear Energy • Maintenance • Decommissioning Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Effects of recrystallization on fission gas behavior in U3Si2 fuel at LWR temperature: A combination of phase-field method and rate theory Editorial Board A quantitative analysis of ATF surface characteristics on critical heat flux using Machine learning Development of an on-line structural integrity assessment system for the primary loop pipeline in NPPs Research on safe disposal technology and progress of radioactive nuclear waste
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1