Time for a change! Uprooting users embedded in the status quo from habitual decision-making

IF 6.7 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Decision Support Systems Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.dss.2024.114371
Xue Sun , Bo Guo , Yufeng Yang , Yu Pan
{"title":"Time for a change! Uprooting users embedded in the status quo from habitual decision-making","authors":"Xue Sun ,&nbsp;Bo Guo ,&nbsp;Yufeng Yang ,&nbsp;Yu Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.dss.2024.114371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Introducing the feature of “Buy Again” or “Order Again” is a common practice for online platforms to facilitate consumer repurchases. Although the adoption of these features can cultivate consumers' dependence on focal products and promote habitual purchases, it potentially hinders the promotion of new products and reduces consumer choice diversity. This raises a broader issue of how to inhibit habitual decision-making, rendering exploring the underlying mechanisms for inhibiting habitual decision-making essential, a topic largely overlooked by previous literature. To address this gap, this research explores how decision-related new information, namely Bayesian updating information, influences consumers' repeated decision-making. Utilizing the paradigm of Monty Hall dilemma, the findings show that Bayesian updating information curtails habitual decisions by encouraging consumers to choose alternative options in both scenarios in which the initial choices are self-decided or given by default. Applying the HDDM (hierarchical drift-diffusion model), the results indicate that, in both scenarios, Bayesian updating information reduces consumers' status quo bias, i.e., mitigates their initial preferences for initial choices, and facilitates the accumulation of evidence for changing initial choices. Notably, when the initial choices are self-decided, consumers with Bayesian updating information tend to seek more evidence to make decisions than those without it, while this trend is not observed when the initial choices are given by default. These findings deepen our understanding of online repeated decision-making and provide valuable insights into the design of decision support systems to discourage consumers' habitual decisions and enhance their choice diversity in online shopping.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55181,"journal":{"name":"Decision Support Systems","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 114371"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Support Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923624002045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introducing the feature of “Buy Again” or “Order Again” is a common practice for online platforms to facilitate consumer repurchases. Although the adoption of these features can cultivate consumers' dependence on focal products and promote habitual purchases, it potentially hinders the promotion of new products and reduces consumer choice diversity. This raises a broader issue of how to inhibit habitual decision-making, rendering exploring the underlying mechanisms for inhibiting habitual decision-making essential, a topic largely overlooked by previous literature. To address this gap, this research explores how decision-related new information, namely Bayesian updating information, influences consumers' repeated decision-making. Utilizing the paradigm of Monty Hall dilemma, the findings show that Bayesian updating information curtails habitual decisions by encouraging consumers to choose alternative options in both scenarios in which the initial choices are self-decided or given by default. Applying the HDDM (hierarchical drift-diffusion model), the results indicate that, in both scenarios, Bayesian updating information reduces consumers' status quo bias, i.e., mitigates their initial preferences for initial choices, and facilitates the accumulation of evidence for changing initial choices. Notably, when the initial choices are self-decided, consumers with Bayesian updating information tend to seek more evidence to make decisions than those without it, while this trend is not observed when the initial choices are given by default. These findings deepen our understanding of online repeated decision-making and provide valuable insights into the design of decision support systems to discourage consumers' habitual decisions and enhance their choice diversity in online shopping.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Decision Support Systems
Decision Support Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
13 months
期刊介绍: The common thread of articles published in Decision Support Systems is their relevance to theoretical and technical issues in the support of enhanced decision making. The areas addressed may include foundations, functionality, interfaces, implementation, impacts, and evaluation of decision support systems (DSSs).
期刊最新文献
Re-evaluating causal inference: Bias reduction in confounder-effect modifier scenarios Editorial Board Optimal advertising strategy for streaming platforms: Whether to purchase external consumer data Balancing the costs and benefits of resilience-based decision making Are helpful reviews indeed helpful? Analyzing the information and economic value of contextual cues in user-generated images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1