Vineyard mycobiota shows a local and long-term response to the organic mulches application

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2025-04-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2025.109506
David Labarga , Andreu Mairata , Miguel Puelles , Jordi Tronchoni , Ales Eichmeier , María de Toro , David Gramaje , Alicia Pou
{"title":"Vineyard mycobiota shows a local and long-term response to the organic mulches application","authors":"David Labarga ,&nbsp;Andreu Mairata ,&nbsp;Miguel Puelles ,&nbsp;Jordi Tronchoni ,&nbsp;Ales Eichmeier ,&nbsp;María de Toro ,&nbsp;David Gramaje ,&nbsp;Alicia Pou","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Viticulture faces global warming challenge, prompting focus on sustainable practices. Organic mulches, an alternative to conventional practices, have shown the potential to enhance plant performance and soil quality. However, their impact on soil and must microbiota remains unexplored. Our three-year study, conducted in two vineyards located in Logroño and Aldeanueva within the appellation of origin (DOCa) Rioja (Spain) aimed to assess the effects of five soil treatments—two conventional (Herbicide (H) and Tillage (T)) and three organic mulches (Grapevine Pruning Debris (GPD), Spent Mushrooms Compost (SMC) and Straw (S))— on soil and must fungal communities through a metataxonomic approach (ITS region). We hypothesized that mulches might modify soil and must fungal microbiota, thus influencing plant health and the winemaking process. Our findings revealed that soil and must fungal communities were primarily driven by location. While treatments did not significantly impact must microbiota, soil fungal communities varied with treatments in the third year, with notable disparities across locations. In Logroño, GPD and H showed the highest diversity, while S exhibited the highest diversity in Aldeanueva. Besides, none of the mulches promoted the growth of pathogenic fungi associated with common vineyard diseases. Finally, the <em>Saccharomycetaceae</em> family was found in must and soil, indicating its presence in the soil prior to grape colonization. Overall, location emerged as the primary factor influencing soil and must fungi. Organic mulches demonstrated long-term effects on soil fungal diversity, although these effects varied across locations. This study pioneers a comprehensive assessment of organic mulches in shaping vineyard fungal communities across diverse soils, offering unprecedented insights into sustainable practices that enhance soil biodiversity and ecosystem resilience without elevating disease risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"382 ","pages":"Article 109506"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925000386","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Viticulture faces global warming challenge, prompting focus on sustainable practices. Organic mulches, an alternative to conventional practices, have shown the potential to enhance plant performance and soil quality. However, their impact on soil and must microbiota remains unexplored. Our three-year study, conducted in two vineyards located in Logroño and Aldeanueva within the appellation of origin (DOCa) Rioja (Spain) aimed to assess the effects of five soil treatments—two conventional (Herbicide (H) and Tillage (T)) and three organic mulches (Grapevine Pruning Debris (GPD), Spent Mushrooms Compost (SMC) and Straw (S))— on soil and must fungal communities through a metataxonomic approach (ITS region). We hypothesized that mulches might modify soil and must fungal microbiota, thus influencing plant health and the winemaking process. Our findings revealed that soil and must fungal communities were primarily driven by location. While treatments did not significantly impact must microbiota, soil fungal communities varied with treatments in the third year, with notable disparities across locations. In Logroño, GPD and H showed the highest diversity, while S exhibited the highest diversity in Aldeanueva. Besides, none of the mulches promoted the growth of pathogenic fungi associated with common vineyard diseases. Finally, the Saccharomycetaceae family was found in must and soil, indicating its presence in the soil prior to grape colonization. Overall, location emerged as the primary factor influencing soil and must fungi. Organic mulches demonstrated long-term effects on soil fungal diversity, although these effects varied across locations. This study pioneers a comprehensive assessment of organic mulches in shaping vineyard fungal communities across diverse soils, offering unprecedented insights into sustainable practices that enhance soil biodiversity and ecosystem resilience without elevating disease risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄园真菌群对有机地膜的施用表现出局部和长期的响应
葡萄栽培面临全球变暖的挑战,促使人们关注可持续的做法。有机地膜作为传统做法的一种替代方案,已经显示出提高植物性能和土壤质量的潜力。然而,它们对土壤和微生物群的影响仍未被探索。我们在西班牙里奥哈原产地名称(DOCa)的Logroño和Aldeanueva两个葡萄园进行了为期三年的研究,旨在通过元分类学方法(ITS区域)评估五种土壤处理方法对土壤和真菌群落的影响——两种传统土壤处理(除草剂(H)和耕作(T))和三种有机地膜(葡萄修剪碎片(GPD),废蘑菇堆肥(SMC)和秸秆(S))。我们假设地膜可能会改变土壤和真菌微生物群,从而影响植物健康和酿酒过程。我们的研究结果表明,土壤和真菌群落主要由位置驱动。虽然处理对土壤微生物群没有显著影响,但土壤真菌群落在第三年随处理而变化,在不同地点之间存在显著差异。在Logroño中,GPD和H的多样性最高,而在Aldeanueva中,S的多样性最高。此外,没有一种地膜能促进与葡萄园常见病害相关的病原菌的生长。最后,在土壤和土壤中发现了Saccharomycetaceae家族,表明它在葡萄定植之前就存在于土壤中。总体而言,地理位置是影响土壤和真菌生长的主要因素。有机地膜显示出对土壤真菌多样性的长期影响,尽管这些影响在不同地点有所不同。本研究率先对有机地膜在不同土壤中塑造葡萄园真菌群落的作用进行了全面评估,为在不增加疾病风险的情况下增强土壤生物多样性和生态系统恢复力的可持续实践提供了前所未有的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Atmospheric acid deposition leads to increased soil inorganic carbon loss on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Soil microarthropods mitigate nitrogen loss and enhance crop yield in residue-amended soils A global meta-analysis of forest edge effects on arthropod abundance and richness Soil microbial taxonomic traits control the biogeography of carbon use efficiency Straw return coupled with subsoiling tillage reduces N₂O emissions and increases nitrogen content under long-term (12 years) trial in a coastal saline cotton field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1