Fungicide treatments drive changes in the diversity and species richness of tissue-resident bacteria in agrobiont cobweb-weaving and epigeic spiders

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2025.109477
Milan Řezáč , Veronika Řezáčová , Nela Gloríková , Ema Némethová , Petr Heneberg
{"title":"Fungicide treatments drive changes in the diversity and species richness of tissue-resident bacteria in agrobiont cobweb-weaving and epigeic spiders","authors":"Milan Řezáč ,&nbsp;Veronika Řezáčová ,&nbsp;Nela Gloríková ,&nbsp;Ema Némethová ,&nbsp;Petr Heneberg","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agrochemicals have the potential to induce large-scale changes in the abundance and diversity of endosymbionts. Moreover, although there is still no direct proof of the ability of <em>Rickettsia</em> and <em>Wolbachia</em> to degrade or detoxify insecticides or other agrochemicals, changes in the abundance or diversity of endosymbiotic bacteria were reported to alter insecticide resistance. We hypothesized that treatment with one or more fungicides affects the species richness and relative abundance of microbial endosymbionts of agrobiont cobweb-weaving and epigeic spiders. We further hypothesized that microbial endosymbiont composition may affect agrochemical resistance. We used <em>Phylloneta impressa</em> as a model cobweb-weaving species and <em>Pardosa agrestis</em> as a model epigeic species and tested the effects of four chemically unrelated fungicides, Captan, Kocide (copper oxychloride), Kuprikol (copper hydroxide), and Super Tin (triphenyltin hydroxide). Furthermore, we determined the resistance to three other agrochemicals, Benevia (cyantraniliprole), Coragen (chlorantraniliprole), and Mospilan (acetamiprid). The analyses were based on 16S rDNA profiles from lysates of the cephalothorax and legs of the tested spiders. Fungicide treatment induced prominent changes in the diversity and richness of tissue-resident bacterial assemblages, including facultative and obligate endosymbionts. However, the direction of the observed responses varied with the fungicide used and differed between the two tested species. The observed fungicide-induced changes had direct effects on resistance to insecticides. Namely, Captan treatment and/or altered diversity and richness of facultative and obligate endosymbionts led to increases in Benevia (cyantraniliprole) resistance of the host spiders. The combined data show that fungicides shape the tissue-associated bacterial communities in spiders, including their endosymbionts. Both study species had a high prevalence of infection of <em>Rickettsia</em> and <em>Wolbachia</em> and a 100 % prevalence of <em>Spiroplasma</em>. These endosymbiotic genera responded to the fungicide treatment, and changes in their relative abundance were associated with the possible onset of Benevia (cyantraniliprole) resistance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"382 ","pages":"Article 109477"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016788092500009X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agrochemicals have the potential to induce large-scale changes in the abundance and diversity of endosymbionts. Moreover, although there is still no direct proof of the ability of Rickettsia and Wolbachia to degrade or detoxify insecticides or other agrochemicals, changes in the abundance or diversity of endosymbiotic bacteria were reported to alter insecticide resistance. We hypothesized that treatment with one or more fungicides affects the species richness and relative abundance of microbial endosymbionts of agrobiont cobweb-weaving and epigeic spiders. We further hypothesized that microbial endosymbiont composition may affect agrochemical resistance. We used Phylloneta impressa as a model cobweb-weaving species and Pardosa agrestis as a model epigeic species and tested the effects of four chemically unrelated fungicides, Captan, Kocide (copper oxychloride), Kuprikol (copper hydroxide), and Super Tin (triphenyltin hydroxide). Furthermore, we determined the resistance to three other agrochemicals, Benevia (cyantraniliprole), Coragen (chlorantraniliprole), and Mospilan (acetamiprid). The analyses were based on 16S rDNA profiles from lysates of the cephalothorax and legs of the tested spiders. Fungicide treatment induced prominent changes in the diversity and richness of tissue-resident bacterial assemblages, including facultative and obligate endosymbionts. However, the direction of the observed responses varied with the fungicide used and differed between the two tested species. The observed fungicide-induced changes had direct effects on resistance to insecticides. Namely, Captan treatment and/or altered diversity and richness of facultative and obligate endosymbionts led to increases in Benevia (cyantraniliprole) resistance of the host spiders. The combined data show that fungicides shape the tissue-associated bacterial communities in spiders, including their endosymbionts. Both study species had a high prevalence of infection of Rickettsia and Wolbachia and a 100 % prevalence of Spiroplasma. These endosymbiotic genera responded to the fungicide treatment, and changes in their relative abundance were associated with the possible onset of Benevia (cyantraniliprole) resistance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
杀菌剂处理导致农生物织网蜘蛛和附生蜘蛛组织驻留细菌的多样性和物种丰富度的变化
农用化学品有可能引起内共生生物丰度和多样性的大规模变化。此外,虽然目前还没有立克次体和沃尔巴克氏体降解或解毒杀虫剂或其他农用化学品的能力的直接证据,但据报道,内共生细菌的丰度或多样性的变化会改变杀虫剂耐药性。我们假设使用一种或多种杀菌剂会影响农生物织网蜘蛛和附生蜘蛛的物种丰富度和微生物内共生体的相对丰度。我们进一步假设微生物内共生菌的组成可能影响农药抗性。本研究以织网种Phylloneta impressa和外生种Pardosa agrestis为模型,分别对Captan、Kocide(氧化铜)、Kuprikol(氢氧化铜)和Super Tin(三苯基氢氧化锡)4种化学性质无关的杀菌剂进行了效果试验。此外,我们还测定了对其他三种农药的抗性,即benvia(氰虫腈)、Coragen(氯虫腈)和Mospilan(啶虫脒)。分析是基于从被测试蜘蛛的头胸和腿的裂解物中提取的16S rDNA图谱。杀菌剂处理导致组织内细菌组合的多样性和丰富度发生显著变化,包括兼性和专性内共生体。然而,所观察到的反应方向因使用的杀菌剂而异,并且在两种被试物种之间存在差异。所观察到的杀菌剂诱导的变化对杀虫剂抗性有直接影响。也就是说,Captan处理和/或改变兼性和专性内共生体的多样性和丰富度导致寄主蜘蛛对Benevia (cyantraniliprole)的抗性增加。综合数据表明,杀菌剂塑造了蜘蛛体内与组织相关的细菌群落,包括它们的内共生体。两个研究物种的立克次体和沃尔巴克氏体感染率都很高,螺旋体感染率为100% %。这些内共生菌属对杀菌剂处理有反应,其相对丰度的变化与可能出现的benvia (cyantranilprole)抗性有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Co-grazing of cattle and sheep weakens the diet selectivity of cattle Long-term nitrogen fertilizer improves nitrogen use efficiency and wheat yield by regulating the interactions of rhizosphere soil-root-microbes Forage-crop rotation enhances soil microbial diversity and network stability under precipitation variability in rain-fed agroecosystems Expansion of the native Ligularia virgaurea disrupts soil–microbe interactions and degrades alpine pasture ecosystem functions Single straw return reduces greenhouse gas emissions from maize-growing soils in an 8-year continuous field trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1