Shoot the moving target: A dynamic perspective on optimal distinctiveness and strategic repositioning

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115173
Pengfei Wang , Yanlin Shi
{"title":"Shoot the moving target: A dynamic perspective on optimal distinctiveness and strategic repositioning","authors":"Pengfei Wang ,&nbsp;Yanlin Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How efficacious is the strategy of pursuing optimal distinctiveness (OD)? Scholars have long strived to identify the optimal positions for firms in the market and advocate them to realign themselves accordingly. While plausible, however, prior literature overlooks the process of repositioning towards OD and the dynamic nature of market landscape. Specifically, if all firms reposition simultaneously, current optimal positions could become inferior, such that firms that deliberately move towards OD (<em>OD firms</em>) may get backfired. Emphasizing the dynamics, we utilize a parsimonious agent-based simulation to explore the efficacy of repositioning towards OD. The results indicate that across different scenarios, a significant proportion of OD firms end up experiencing repositioning failure and fail to improve their performance. More importantly, we underscore that the efficacy of repositioning towards OD depends largely on market conditions. It is particularly undermined in markets with more competitors seeking distinctiveness and/or fewer competitors aiming for conformity (e.g., markets with greater leniency). Experimenting with different approaches firms can take to pursue OD, we also find that exploratory repositioning performs better than exploitative repositioning. Finally, our extensional analyses offer further insights by integrating repositioning costs, sequential repositioning, alternative optimal locations, and random explorers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 115173"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324006775","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How efficacious is the strategy of pursuing optimal distinctiveness (OD)? Scholars have long strived to identify the optimal positions for firms in the market and advocate them to realign themselves accordingly. While plausible, however, prior literature overlooks the process of repositioning towards OD and the dynamic nature of market landscape. Specifically, if all firms reposition simultaneously, current optimal positions could become inferior, such that firms that deliberately move towards OD (OD firms) may get backfired. Emphasizing the dynamics, we utilize a parsimonious agent-based simulation to explore the efficacy of repositioning towards OD. The results indicate that across different scenarios, a significant proportion of OD firms end up experiencing repositioning failure and fail to improve their performance. More importantly, we underscore that the efficacy of repositioning towards OD depends largely on market conditions. It is particularly undermined in markets with more competitors seeking distinctiveness and/or fewer competitors aiming for conformity (e.g., markets with greater leniency). Experimenting with different approaches firms can take to pursue OD, we also find that exploratory repositioning performs better than exploitative repositioning. Finally, our extensional analyses offer further insights by integrating repositioning costs, sequential repositioning, alternative optimal locations, and random explorers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
射击运动目标:最优独特性与战略再定位的动态视角
追求最优独特性(OD)策略的有效性如何?长期以来,学者们一直在努力确定企业在市场中的最佳位置,并主张它们相应地重新调整自己。虽然有道理,但是,先前的文献忽略了向OD重新定位的过程和市场格局的动态性。具体来说,如果所有企业同时重新定位,当前的最佳位置可能会变得较差,这样,那些故意向OD (OD企业)移动的企业可能会适得其反。强调动力学,我们利用一个简洁的基于智能体的仿真来探索重新定位到OD的有效性。结果表明,在不同情景下,相当比例的OD企业最终经历了重新定位失败,未能改善其绩效。更重要的是,我们强调,向OD重新定位的效果在很大程度上取决于市场情况。在追求独特性的竞争对手较多和/或追求一致性的竞争对手较少的市场(例如,更宽松的市场)中,这一点尤其受到损害。通过对企业追求OD的不同方法的实验,我们还发现探索性重新定位比剥削性重新定位效果更好。最后,我们的扩展分析通过整合重新定位成本、顺序重新定位、备选最佳位置和随机探索者,提供了进一步的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Building social legitimacy through NGOs partnerships: evidence from micro-multinationals I hereby consent: Leveraging consent management and chatbot anthropomorphism to influence information disclosure and usage intentions Do the environmental underperformance intensity and duration affect corporate green innovation? evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry The influence of national contexts on hybrid tensions, and how to manage them through business model innovation Demands, resources, and employee wellbeing during the Covid-19 pandemic: “traditional” values as psychological buffer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1