What do you want to hear? A self-presentation view of social desirability bias

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115191
Katherine C. Alexander , Jeremy D. Mackey , Charn P. McAllister , B. Parker Ellen III
{"title":"What do you want to hear? A self-presentation view of social desirability bias","authors":"Katherine C. Alexander ,&nbsp;Jeremy D. Mackey ,&nbsp;Charn P. McAllister ,&nbsp;B. Parker Ellen III","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The purpose of this paper is to revitalize the study and measurement of social desirability bias in the field so researchers can remedy the methodological ills it was originally meant to address. To improve scholars’ ability to mitigate these concerns, we conduct research that enables us to (1) generate a cohesive and parsimonious theoretical explanation of social desirability bias and (2) develop new measures of social desirability bias that will improve the field’s understanding of its effects. First, we utilize self-presentation theory to explain the differences between social desirability as a trait bias and socially desirable responding as a state bias under the larger social desirability bias umbrella construct. Then, we conduct a 13-sample measure development study to generate new content-valid measures of social desirability and socially desirable responding that can be used to improve the precision and nuance of business research knowledge generation moving forward.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 115191"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000141","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to revitalize the study and measurement of social desirability bias in the field so researchers can remedy the methodological ills it was originally meant to address. To improve scholars’ ability to mitigate these concerns, we conduct research that enables us to (1) generate a cohesive and parsimonious theoretical explanation of social desirability bias and (2) develop new measures of social desirability bias that will improve the field’s understanding of its effects. First, we utilize self-presentation theory to explain the differences between social desirability as a trait bias and socially desirable responding as a state bias under the larger social desirability bias umbrella construct. Then, we conduct a 13-sample measure development study to generate new content-valid measures of social desirability and socially desirable responding that can be used to improve the precision and nuance of business research knowledge generation moving forward.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你想听什么?社会可取性偏见的自我呈现观
本文的目的是振兴社会可取性偏见的研究和测量领域,使研究人员能够补救方法上的弊病,它最初是要解决的。为了提高学者们减轻这些担忧的能力,我们进行了研究,使我们能够(1)对社会可取性偏见产生一个连贯而简洁的理论解释,(2)开发出社会可取性偏见的新措施,以提高该领域对其影响的理解。首先,我们利用自我呈现理论解释了在更大的社会可取性偏见伞结构下,作为特质偏见的社会可取性和作为状态偏见的社会可取性反应之间的差异。然后,我们进行了一个13个样本的测量发展研究,以产生新的内容有效的社会可取性和社会可取性响应测量,可用于提高商业研究知识生成的准确性和细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Building social legitimacy through NGOs partnerships: evidence from micro-multinationals I hereby consent: Leveraging consent management and chatbot anthropomorphism to influence information disclosure and usage intentions Do the environmental underperformance intensity and duration affect corporate green innovation? evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry The influence of national contexts on hybrid tensions, and how to manage them through business model innovation Demands, resources, and employee wellbeing during the Covid-19 pandemic: “traditional” values as psychological buffer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1