Ecological restoration of field margins enhances biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in rice agroecosystems

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2025-04-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2025.109484
N. Pérez-Méndez , C. Alcaraz , M. Catala-Forner
{"title":"Ecological restoration of field margins enhances biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in rice agroecosystems","authors":"N. Pérez-Méndez ,&nbsp;C. Alcaraz ,&nbsp;M. Catala-Forner","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecological restoration of non-productive agricultural areas such as field margins has been identified as a key priority to enhance biodiversity and promote multiple ecosystem services within agroecosystems. Field margin restoration is especially important in rice (<em>Oryza sativa</em>, L), a globally important crop which occupies around 15 % of world cropland surface. Even though assessment of how ecosystem service multifunctionality varies across different restoration strategies is scarce. Here, by using a 3-year field scale experiment, we evaluated how different restoration strategies (i.e., hedgerows, flower strips and passive restoration) contribute to ecosystem service multifunctionality in rice farming. We focused on the simultaneous provision of biodiversity enhancement, pest and weed control, mitigation of invasive species impact, and soil protection. We found that all restoration strategies substantially increased multifunctionality when compared to non-restored margins, with improved plant and natural enemy diversity, reduced weed abundance, enhanced protection against the invasive red swamp crawfish, and decreased soil erosion. Multifunctionality was similar across restoration strategies, yet the passive spontaneous restoration emerged as the most economically feasible. Overall, our results underscore the value of restoring non-productive areas such as field margins to promote rice multifunctional landscapes. Specifically, passive restoration strategies offer a promising approach to enhance multiple ecosystem services while remaining cost-effective, supporting both biodiversity conservation and sustainable agricultural production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"382 ","pages":"Article 109484"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925000167","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecological restoration of non-productive agricultural areas such as field margins has been identified as a key priority to enhance biodiversity and promote multiple ecosystem services within agroecosystems. Field margin restoration is especially important in rice (Oryza sativa, L), a globally important crop which occupies around 15 % of world cropland surface. Even though assessment of how ecosystem service multifunctionality varies across different restoration strategies is scarce. Here, by using a 3-year field scale experiment, we evaluated how different restoration strategies (i.e., hedgerows, flower strips and passive restoration) contribute to ecosystem service multifunctionality in rice farming. We focused on the simultaneous provision of biodiversity enhancement, pest and weed control, mitigation of invasive species impact, and soil protection. We found that all restoration strategies substantially increased multifunctionality when compared to non-restored margins, with improved plant and natural enemy diversity, reduced weed abundance, enhanced protection against the invasive red swamp crawfish, and decreased soil erosion. Multifunctionality was similar across restoration strategies, yet the passive spontaneous restoration emerged as the most economically feasible. Overall, our results underscore the value of restoring non-productive areas such as field margins to promote rice multifunctional landscapes. Specifically, passive restoration strategies offer a promising approach to enhance multiple ecosystem services while remaining cost-effective, supporting both biodiversity conservation and sustainable agricultural production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农田边缘生态恢复可提高水稻农业生态系统的生物多样性和多种生态系统服务功能
非生产农业区(如田地边缘)的生态恢复已被确定为加强生物多样性和促进农业生态系统内多种生态系统服务的关键优先事项。稻田边缘恢复对水稻(Oryza sativa, L)尤其重要,水稻是一种全球重要作物,约占世界耕地面积的15% %。尽管对生态系统服务多功能性在不同恢复策略中如何变化的评估很少。在此,通过3年的田间规模试验,我们评估了不同的恢复策略(即树篱、花带和被动恢复)如何促进水稻农业生态系统服务的多功能性。我们的重点是同时提供生物多样性增强、害虫和杂草控制、减轻入侵物种影响和土壤保护。研究发现,与未恢复的边缘区相比,所有恢复策略均显著提高了边缘区的多功能性,改善了植物和天敌的多样性,减少了杂草的丰度,增强了对红沼泽小龙虾入侵的保护,减少了土壤侵蚀。各种修复策略的多功能性是相似的,但被动的自发修复在经济上是最可行的。总的来说,我们的研究结果强调了恢复田地边缘等非生产区域以促进水稻多功能景观的价值。具体而言,被动恢复策略提供了一种有希望的方法,可以增强多种生态系统服务,同时保持成本效益,支持生物多样性保护和可持续农业生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Crop diversification drives microbial-mediated nitrogen accumulation via fungal necromass stabilization Effects of nitrogen fertilization on forage production, animal performance, and greenhouse gas emissions in tropical pastures: A systematic review Restoring plant diversity in lowland grasslands: Efficacy of different seed addition and soil preparation methods Enclosure declines plant diversity and homogenization compared to grazing in a Tibetan alpine meadow Enhanced net carbon dioxide sink in rice-duckweed system: Evidence from the diurnal flux variation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1