Grazing and applications of nitrogen and phosphorus effects on herbage production and greenhouse gas emissions of pasture in an arid region

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2025-04-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2025.109496
Yarong Guo, Jiao Ning, Shanning Lou, Fujiang Hou
{"title":"Grazing and applications of nitrogen and phosphorus effects on herbage production and greenhouse gas emissions of pasture in an arid region","authors":"Yarong Guo,&nbsp;Jiao Ning,&nbsp;Shanning Lou,&nbsp;Fujiang Hou","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To promote herbage nutritive yield under global warming, optimizing grazing and proper fertilizer application (nitrogen, N; phosphorus, P) are crucial for balancing herbage nutritive quality production and soil greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions in the arid regions. We conducted a 3-year experiment in a sown grassland to determine the effects of N (0, 75, and 225 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and P fertilizer (0, and 75 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) applications and grazing (grazed, and non-grazed) on soil GHGs emissions, herbage nutritive quality (crude protein, CP; dry matter digestibility, DMD; metabolizable energy, ME), and yield scale of global warming potential over different periods (early growing period, peak growing period, late growing period, and non-growing season) from 2020 to 2022. The results show that grazing had no significant effect on soil GHGs emissions. Moreover, fertilizer application significantly increased soil CH<sub>4</sub> uptake by 20.1 %, soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 12.8 % and soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by 59.1 %. Furthermore, the interaction of grazing and fertilizer application had an additive effect on soil CH<sub>4</sub> uptake, and an antagonistic effect on soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in early growing period. The results showed that grazing decreased herbage yield by 29.03 %, CP yield by 28.72 %, DMD yield by 35.4 %, and ME yield by 26.69 %, the fertilizer application increased herbage yield by 57.6 %, CP yield by 113.1 %, DMD yield by 62.2 % and ME yield by 46.3 %, respectively. In addition, the mean annual herbage, CP, DMD, and ME yield scale of GWP were 1.1 ∼ 7.5, 7.6 ∼ 65.4, 1.5 ∼ 15.7, 12.8 ∼ 84.3 t CO<sub>2</sub>.eg t<sup>−1</sup> yield ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, with the lowest value of the nutritive yield scale of global warming potential found at 225 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> with 75 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup> with/without grazing. Moreover, the CP yield could well predict GWP over different periods. Overall, application of 225 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> with 75 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup> was the appropriate management, which balanced the herbage nutritive quality yield and global warming potential in sown pasture in the arid regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"382 ","pages":"Article 109496"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925000283","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To promote herbage nutritive yield under global warming, optimizing grazing and proper fertilizer application (nitrogen, N; phosphorus, P) are crucial for balancing herbage nutritive quality production and soil greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions in the arid regions. We conducted a 3-year experiment in a sown grassland to determine the effects of N (0, 75, and 225 kg ha−1) and P fertilizer (0, and 75 kg ha−1) applications and grazing (grazed, and non-grazed) on soil GHGs emissions, herbage nutritive quality (crude protein, CP; dry matter digestibility, DMD; metabolizable energy, ME), and yield scale of global warming potential over different periods (early growing period, peak growing period, late growing period, and non-growing season) from 2020 to 2022. The results show that grazing had no significant effect on soil GHGs emissions. Moreover, fertilizer application significantly increased soil CH4 uptake by 20.1 %, soil CO2 emissions by 12.8 % and soil N2O emissions by 59.1 %. Furthermore, the interaction of grazing and fertilizer application had an additive effect on soil CH4 uptake, and an antagonistic effect on soil CO2 emissions in early growing period. The results showed that grazing decreased herbage yield by 29.03 %, CP yield by 28.72 %, DMD yield by 35.4 %, and ME yield by 26.69 %, the fertilizer application increased herbage yield by 57.6 %, CP yield by 113.1 %, DMD yield by 62.2 % and ME yield by 46.3 %, respectively. In addition, the mean annual herbage, CP, DMD, and ME yield scale of GWP were 1.1 ∼ 7.5, 7.6 ∼ 65.4, 1.5 ∼ 15.7, 12.8 ∼ 84.3 t CO2.eg t−1 yield ha−1, respectively, with the lowest value of the nutritive yield scale of global warming potential found at 225 kg N ha−1 with 75 kg P ha−1 with/without grazing. Moreover, the CP yield could well predict GWP over different periods. Overall, application of 225 kg N ha−1 with 75 kg P ha−1 was the appropriate management, which balanced the herbage nutritive quality yield and global warming potential in sown pasture in the arid regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干旱区放牧及氮磷施用对牧草产量和温室气体排放的影响
在全球变暖条件下,优化放牧和合理施肥(氮、氮;在干旱地区,磷(P)是平衡牧草营养品质生产和土壤温室气体(ghg)排放的关键。为了确定氮肥(0、75和225 kg ha−1)和磷肥(0和75 kg ha−1)施用和放牧(放牧和非放牧)对土壤温室气体排放、牧草营养品质(粗蛋白质、CP、CP和CP)的影响,我们在一个播种草地上进行了为期3年的试验。干物质消化率;2020 - 2022年全球变暖潜势不同时期(生长期、生育高峰期、生育后期和非生长期)的产量规模。结果表明,放牧对土壤温室气体排放无显著影响。此外,施肥显著增加了土壤CH4吸收20.1% %,土壤CO2排放12.8% %,土壤N2O排放59.1% %。此外,放牧和施肥的交互作用对生长早期土壤CH4吸收具有加性效应,对土壤CO2排放具有拮抗效应。结果表明:放牧使牧草产量降低29.03 %,CP产量降低28.72 %,DMD产量降低35.4 %,ME产量降低26.69 %;施肥使牧草产量分别提高57.6 %,CP产量提高113.1 %,DMD产量提高62.2 %,ME产量提高46.3 %。GWP的年平均牧草、CP、DMD和ME产量尺度分别为1.1 ~ 7.5、7.6 ~ 65.4、1.5 ~ 15.7、12.8 ~ 84.3 t CO2。在放牧和不放牧条件下,全球变暖潜势营养产量尺度的最低值分别为225 kg N ha−1和75 kg P ha−1。此外,CP收益率可以很好地预测不同时期的GWP。总体而言,225 kg N ha - 1 + 75 kg P ha - 1是平衡干旱地区播种牧草养分品质、产量和全球变暖潜势的适宜管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Atmospheric acid deposition leads to increased soil inorganic carbon loss on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Soil microarthropods mitigate nitrogen loss and enhance crop yield in residue-amended soils A global meta-analysis of forest edge effects on arthropod abundance and richness Soil microbial taxonomic traits control the biogeography of carbon use efficiency Straw return coupled with subsoiling tillage reduces N₂O emissions and increases nitrogen content under long-term (12 years) trial in a coastal saline cotton field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1