Conformity or Differentiation: Optimal distinctiveness through mediating channels

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115154
Duygu Phillips , Bryan D. Edwards , Matthew W. Rutherford
{"title":"Conformity or Differentiation: Optimal distinctiveness through mediating channels","authors":"Duygu Phillips ,&nbsp;Bryan D. Edwards ,&nbsp;Matthew W. Rutherford","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ongoing discourse on optimal distinctiveness surrounding the tradeoff between conformity and differentiation for achieving legitimacy prompts a crucial question: while conformity is known to legitimate, can the converse—differentiation—also confer legitimacy? We propose that new ventures possess the strategic flexibility to choose names conveying conformity or differentiation, enabling them to be perceived as legitimate. Expanding existing paradigms that suggest a tradeoff between the two constructs, we advance a harmonious rather than dissonant role of conformity and differentiation, suggesting that both can lead to legitimacy. More specifically, we expand the theory of optimal distinctiveness by developing a model that elucidates the cognitive processes that culminate in legitimacy perceptions. We then empirically test this model by undertaking an examination of new venture names. The theoretical contribution in this study lies in identifying the mediating mechanisms which explain the relationships between conformity and differentiation and legitimacy perceptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 115154"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324006581","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ongoing discourse on optimal distinctiveness surrounding the tradeoff between conformity and differentiation for achieving legitimacy prompts a crucial question: while conformity is known to legitimate, can the converse—differentiation—also confer legitimacy? We propose that new ventures possess the strategic flexibility to choose names conveying conformity or differentiation, enabling them to be perceived as legitimate. Expanding existing paradigms that suggest a tradeoff between the two constructs, we advance a harmonious rather than dissonant role of conformity and differentiation, suggesting that both can lead to legitimacy. More specifically, we expand the theory of optimal distinctiveness by developing a model that elucidates the cognitive processes that culminate in legitimacy perceptions. We then empirically test this model by undertaking an examination of new venture names. The theoretical contribution in this study lies in identifying the mediating mechanisms which explain the relationships between conformity and differentiation and legitimacy perceptions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整合或差异化:通过中介渠道实现最优独特性
围绕一致性和差异化之间的权衡以获得合法性的最佳独特性正在进行的讨论引发了一个关键问题:虽然众所周知,一致性是合法的,但相反的差异化也能赋予合法性吗?我们建议,新企业应具有战略灵活性,选择符合或差异化的名称,使其被认为是合法的。扩展现有的范式,表明两种结构之间的权衡,我们提出了和谐而不是不和谐的一致性和差异化的作用,表明两者都可以导致合法性。更具体地说,我们通过开发一个模型来扩展最优独特性理论,该模型阐明了最终导致合法性感知的认知过程。然后,我们通过对新企业名称的考察,对这一模型进行了实证检验。本研究的理论贡献在于发现了解释从众分化与正当性认知之间关系的中介机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Building social legitimacy through NGOs partnerships: evidence from micro-multinationals I hereby consent: Leveraging consent management and chatbot anthropomorphism to influence information disclosure and usage intentions Do the environmental underperformance intensity and duration affect corporate green innovation? evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry The influence of national contexts on hybrid tensions, and how to manage them through business model innovation Demands, resources, and employee wellbeing during the Covid-19 pandemic: “traditional” values as psychological buffer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1