Can renewable portfolio standard promote renewable energy capacity utilization? Empirical evidence from China

IF 18 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2024.115159
Shuni Wei, Peng Yuan, Renjie Yu
{"title":"Can renewable portfolio standard promote renewable energy capacity utilization? Empirical evidence from China","authors":"Shuni Wei,&nbsp;Peng Yuan,&nbsp;Renjie Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the costs of renewable energy generation decline, the focus of renewable energy policies has shifted from feed-in tariff to renewable portfolio standard (RPS). While existing literature has examined the effects of RPS on the installed capacity, capacity additions, and power generation of renewable energy, it has largely overlooked the impact on renewable energy capacity utilization. This study evaluates the effect of China's RPS on the capacity utilization of renewable energy, as well as the spillover effects of this policy on thermal and hydroelectric power, using a difference-in-differences model. The results indicate that RPS target stringency has a positive effect on the capacity utilization of non-hydro renewable energy in China. Increasing the RPS target stringency by one standard deviation leads to an increase of 130 hours in the average annual operating hours of non-hydro renewable energy power plants, representing a 7% increase relative to the standard deviation of the dependent variable. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that more stringent RPS targets significantly boost wind power capacity utilization while reducing photovoltaic power capacity utilization, with no significant effect on biomass power capacity utilization. Additionally, the RPS policy has spillover effects, increasing thermal power capacity utilization while suppressing hydroelectric power capacity utilization. These findings provide valuable insights for countries implementing RPS policies, enabling them to optimize policy design to enhance the capacity utilization of renewable energy and facilitate the low-carbon transition of their energy systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 115159"},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124008852","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the costs of renewable energy generation decline, the focus of renewable energy policies has shifted from feed-in tariff to renewable portfolio standard (RPS). While existing literature has examined the effects of RPS on the installed capacity, capacity additions, and power generation of renewable energy, it has largely overlooked the impact on renewable energy capacity utilization. This study evaluates the effect of China's RPS on the capacity utilization of renewable energy, as well as the spillover effects of this policy on thermal and hydroelectric power, using a difference-in-differences model. The results indicate that RPS target stringency has a positive effect on the capacity utilization of non-hydro renewable energy in China. Increasing the RPS target stringency by one standard deviation leads to an increase of 130 hours in the average annual operating hours of non-hydro renewable energy power plants, representing a 7% increase relative to the standard deviation of the dependent variable. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that more stringent RPS targets significantly boost wind power capacity utilization while reducing photovoltaic power capacity utilization, with no significant effect on biomass power capacity utilization. Additionally, the RPS policy has spillover effects, increasing thermal power capacity utilization while suppressing hydroelectric power capacity utilization. These findings provide valuable insights for countries implementing RPS policies, enabling them to optimize policy design to enhance the capacity utilization of renewable energy and facilitate the low-carbon transition of their energy systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可再生能源投资组合标准能否促进可再生能源产能利用?来自中国的经验证据
随着可再生能源发电成本的下降,可再生能源政策的重点已从上网电价转向可再生能源组合标准(RPS)。虽然现有文献研究了可再生能源装机容量、新增装机容量和发电容量对可再生能源的影响,但在很大程度上忽略了对可再生能源产能利用率的影响。本研究利用差中差模型,评估了中国可再生能源产能利用政策对可再生能源产能利用的影响,以及该政策对火电和水电的溢出效应。结果表明,RPS目标严格性对中国非水电可再生能源容量利用具有积极影响。RPS目标严格度每提高一个标准差,非水电可再生能源电厂年平均运行小时数增加130小时,相对于因变量标准差增加7%。异质性分析表明,RPS目标越严格,风电容量利用率越高,光伏发电容量利用率越低,对生物质发电容量利用率影响不显著。此外,RPS政策具有溢出效应,提高了火电产能利用率,抑制了水电产能利用率。这些发现为实施可再生能源政策的国家提供了有价值的见解,使它们能够优化政策设计,提高可再生能源的产能利用率,促进其能源系统的低碳转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Structural dynamics of the renewable energy economy: A longitudinal input-output insights for a resilient transition Innovation based on the co-evolution of institutions and firms: An integrative literature review of the electric vehicle transition A scoping review on psychology-driven demand side management: From behavioral insights to energy system flexibility A waste-valorising pathway for circular hydrogen economies Unleashing the potential of carbon dioxide: Advanced cooling strategies for next-generation small-scale high heat-flux electronics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1