Clean energy innovation, corporate carbon footprint and profits: Win-win strategic options

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2024.115255
Francisco Porles-Ochoa, Ruben Guevara
{"title":"Clean energy innovation, corporate carbon footprint and profits: Win-win strategic options","authors":"Francisco Porles-Ochoa,&nbsp;Ruben Guevara","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The widespread use of fossil fuels in production processes, along with a heavy dependency on carbon-based materials in firms that emit substantial amounts of carbon dioxide equivalent, poses a global threat to both environmental and economic sustainability. A better understanding is needed regarding the relevance of clean energy innovation and its direct and indirect impact on lowering carbon footprints in the existing body of research. This study employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology for a systematic review, followed by an in-depth evaluation of findings. The review examined 153 scholarly articles published between 2018 and 2023, aiming to assess the evolutionary nuances of clean energy innovation in the context of global decarbonisation. Results indicate that 58.5 % of evaluated hypotheses demonstrate a positive association between corporate environmental and financial performance, whilst 31.4 % show a negative impact on profitability. The remaining 10.1 % yield mixed findings. Notably, there is a paucity of research on the potential moderating or mediating effects of clean energy innovation on this relationship. This study contributes to the scientific corpus by identifying two understudied research areas. Firstly, Scope 3 emissions have a substantial and positive effect on the major corporations' overall financial performance. Secondly, further research is warranted to determine how clean energy innovation can moderate or mediate the relationship between eco-innovation strategies and company performance. This research is vital for understanding clean energy innovation's potential as a pathway toward decarbonisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 115255"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212400981X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread use of fossil fuels in production processes, along with a heavy dependency on carbon-based materials in firms that emit substantial amounts of carbon dioxide equivalent, poses a global threat to both environmental and economic sustainability. A better understanding is needed regarding the relevance of clean energy innovation and its direct and indirect impact on lowering carbon footprints in the existing body of research. This study employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology for a systematic review, followed by an in-depth evaluation of findings. The review examined 153 scholarly articles published between 2018 and 2023, aiming to assess the evolutionary nuances of clean energy innovation in the context of global decarbonisation. Results indicate that 58.5 % of evaluated hypotheses demonstrate a positive association between corporate environmental and financial performance, whilst 31.4 % show a negative impact on profitability. The remaining 10.1 % yield mixed findings. Notably, there is a paucity of research on the potential moderating or mediating effects of clean energy innovation on this relationship. This study contributes to the scientific corpus by identifying two understudied research areas. Firstly, Scope 3 emissions have a substantial and positive effect on the major corporations' overall financial performance. Secondly, further research is warranted to determine how clean energy innovation can moderate or mediate the relationship between eco-innovation strategies and company performance. This research is vital for understanding clean energy innovation's potential as a pathway toward decarbonisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
清洁能源创新、企业碳足迹和利润:双赢战略选择
化石燃料在生产过程中的广泛使用,以及排放大量二氧化碳当量的企业对碳基材料的严重依赖,对环境和经济的可持续性构成了全球性威胁。需要更好地了解清洁能源创新的相关性及其在现有研究中对降低碳足迹的直接和间接影响。本研究采用系统评价首选报告项目和荟萃分析方法进行系统评价,然后对研究结果进行深入评估。该综述审查了2018年至2023年间发表的153篇学术文章,旨在评估全球脱碳背景下清洁能源创新的进化细微差别。结果表明,58.5%的评估假设表明企业环境和财务绩效之间存在正相关关系,而31.4%的假设表明对盈利能力有负面影响。其余10.1%的研究结果好坏参半。值得注意的是,关于清洁能源创新对这种关系的潜在调节或中介作用的研究很少。本研究通过确定两个研究不足的研究领域,为科学语料库做出了贡献。首先,范围3的排放对大公司的整体财务绩效有实质性的积极影响。其次,需要进一步研究清洁能源创新如何调节或中介生态创新战略与公司绩效之间的关系。这项研究对于理解清洁能源创新作为脱碳途径的潜力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Fracture flow channeling in enhanced geothermal systems: THMC feedback mechanisms and mitigation strategies Integrated dark fermentation and bioelectrochemical systems for waste valorization: A review of microbial fuel cell and microbial electrolysis cell coupling approaches Flash Joule heating: An ultrafast electrothermal strategy for solid waste valorization and resource recovery The Renewable energy-Food processing-Sustainability Nexus: A PRISMA review of innovations, sustainability metrics and indicators Impacts of net-zero emission target on the power sector: A systematic review from an integrated energy-environment-economy perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1