Measuring creative self-efficacy: Instrument development and validation

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101738
Kristen N. Lamb , Peter Boedeker , Todd Kettler
{"title":"Measuring creative self-efficacy: Instrument development and validation","authors":"Kristen N. Lamb ,&nbsp;Peter Boedeker ,&nbsp;Todd Kettler","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Creative self-efficacy has increasingly gained traction in the field of creativity research and has been described as a key component of creative outcomes. However, most studies have used short scales or author-developed instruments consisting of three items to measure the construct of creative self-efficacy. The purpose of this study was to respond to the call for additional research in this area and the development of a longer, reliable scale to measure creative self-efficacy. The authors of this study present findings that support the validity and reliability of the creative self-efficacy scale developed and examined in this study. Exploratory and confirmatory analyses were conducted and supported a single factor structure of creative self-efficacy. A set of 20 items that all had pattern coefficients greater than 0.61 with the single factor were retained to create the final version of the creative self-efficacy scale. Implications and future areas of research are also discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101738"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124002797","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creative self-efficacy has increasingly gained traction in the field of creativity research and has been described as a key component of creative outcomes. However, most studies have used short scales or author-developed instruments consisting of three items to measure the construct of creative self-efficacy. The purpose of this study was to respond to the call for additional research in this area and the development of a longer, reliable scale to measure creative self-efficacy. The authors of this study present findings that support the validity and reliability of the creative self-efficacy scale developed and examined in this study. Exploratory and confirmatory analyses were conducted and supported a single factor structure of creative self-efficacy. A set of 20 items that all had pattern coefficients greater than 0.61 with the single factor were retained to create the final version of the creative self-efficacy scale. Implications and future areas of research are also discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创造性自我效能的测量:工具开发与验证
创造性自我效能感在创造性研究领域越来越受到关注,并被描述为创造性成果的关键组成部分。然而,大多数研究都使用短量表或作者开发的由三个项目组成的工具来测量创造性自我效能的结构。本研究的目的是响应对这一领域进一步研究的呼吁,并开发一个更长的、可靠的量表来衡量创造性自我效能。本研究的作者提出了支持本研究开发和检验的创造性自我效能量表的有效性和可靠性的研究结果。进行了探索性和验证性分析,并支持创造性自我效能的单因素结构。保留20个单因素模式系数均大于0.61的条目组成最终版本的创造性自我效能量表。本文还讨论了研究的意义和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
期刊最新文献
Generative AI and creative self-efficacy: A systematic review How does emotional valence influence the interpretation of conceptual combinations? Solving the paradox between the generalized partial credit model and PISA’s rating instructions: A generalized IRTree approach to within-rating multidimensionality Uncovering the effect of Gen AI-assisted learning on students’ creativity: A meta-analysis from quasi-experimental evidence Exploring the relationship between mathematical convergent and divergent thinking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1