Exploring vision tests as a surrogate for depression screening in patients with a visual impairment: A cross-sectional study

Karen Eden , Andrew G. Day , Aidan Pucchio , Rohit Shukla , Mark Bona
{"title":"Exploring vision tests as a surrogate for depression screening in patients with a visual impairment: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Karen Eden ,&nbsp;Andrew G. Day ,&nbsp;Aidan Pucchio ,&nbsp;Rohit Shukla ,&nbsp;Mark Bona","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate if vision tests can act as a surrogate for depression screening in visually impaired adult patients, and explore the association between self-reported visual function and depression.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consecutive adult patients (≥18 years) (<em>n</em> = 237) who received a low vision assessment at a hospital-based vision rehabilitation clinic between July 2018 to March 2020, were recruited into the study. The clinic serves patients that have a visual acuity ≤6/15 in the better seeing eye, constricted visual fields &lt;20°, or functional deficits relating to vision loss. Patients were screened for depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The association between risk of depression and vision tests (distance visual acuity, reading acuity, critical print size, contrast sensitivity, and fixation stability) and patient reported visual function (The National Eye Institute, Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25)), was measured using multivariable linear regression modelling.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighteen percent of patients scored ≥10 on the PHQ-9, indicating risk of major depression. There was no significant association between the vision test scores and the PHQ-9. However, there was a significant association between distance visual acuity (<em>p</em> = 0.010), reading acuity (<em>p</em> = 0.008), contrast sensitivity (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001) and the VFQ-25 mental health domain. Further, all VFQ-25 domains were significantly associated with the PHQ-9.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While the vision test scores were not significantly associated with risk of depression, self-reported visual functioning was. We were unable to demonstrate vision tests acting as a surrogate for the PHQ9 when identifying patients at risk of generalized depression. Further investigation is warranted to determine if a correlation can be found with a different mental health-screening tool.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate if vision tests can act as a surrogate for depression screening in visually impaired adult patients, and explore the association between self-reported visual function and depression.

Design

Cross-sectional.

Methods

Consecutive adult patients (≥18 years) (n = 237) who received a low vision assessment at a hospital-based vision rehabilitation clinic between July 2018 to March 2020, were recruited into the study. The clinic serves patients that have a visual acuity ≤6/15 in the better seeing eye, constricted visual fields <20°, or functional deficits relating to vision loss. Patients were screened for depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The association between risk of depression and vision tests (distance visual acuity, reading acuity, critical print size, contrast sensitivity, and fixation stability) and patient reported visual function (The National Eye Institute, Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25)), was measured using multivariable linear regression modelling.

Results

Eighteen percent of patients scored ≥10 on the PHQ-9, indicating risk of major depression. There was no significant association between the vision test scores and the PHQ-9. However, there was a significant association between distance visual acuity (p = 0.010), reading acuity (p = 0.008), contrast sensitivity (p < 0.0001) and the VFQ-25 mental health domain. Further, all VFQ-25 domains were significantly associated with the PHQ-9.

Conclusion

While the vision test scores were not significantly associated with risk of depression, self-reported visual functioning was. We were unable to demonstrate vision tests acting as a surrogate for the PHQ9 when identifying patients at risk of generalized depression. Further investigation is warranted to determine if a correlation can be found with a different mental health-screening tool.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of a school eye health program in Petauke district, Zambia Structural and functional clinician-reported outcomes show strong correlations with patient-reported outcomes in Retinitis Pigmentosa Chat GPT 4o vs residents: French language evaluation in ophthalmology Impact of a novel limbal-rigid contact lens on potential cost savings in Stevens-Johnson syndrome patients from postmarket surveillance Computational analysis of reproducibility and image quality of 2011 and 2017 models of Heidelberg Spectralis SD-OCT machines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1