Selection of passive energy consumption optimisation strategies for buildings

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2024.115222
Amirhossein Balali, Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo
{"title":"Selection of passive energy consumption optimisation strategies for buildings","authors":"Amirhossein Balali,&nbsp;Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Passive energy consumption optimisation strategies are apt solutions to tackle the negative impacts of buildings on people and environment. However, the existence of numerous criteria has made the selection of suitable passive strategies very challenging and complicated, which is perhaps the reason for the scarcity of comprehensive studies that simultaneously consider all classes of selection criteria, especially technical, economic, and social ones. This study initially identifies the existing passive strategies and the criteria involved in their identification, weighting, ranking, and selection, with particular emphasis on buildings located in the United Kingdom. Questionnaire survey was utilised for data collection due to the reliance of specific selection criteria, such as “job creation”, on expert judgment. The gathered data were then analysed by the hybridisation of criteria importance through inter criteria correlation (CRITIC) and evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) fuzzy approaches. Based on the obtained results, “reduction of greenhouse gas emissions”, “being environmentally friendly”, “flammability”, and “reduction of energy consumption” were ranked as the most important selection criteria. Consequently, the best and most sustainable passive strategies were concluded to be “improving fenestration design of building, “air tightness improvement of building”, and “optimum design of building's insulation layer”, with final scores of 0.882, 0.876, and 0.828, respectively. The results obtained from this study can have a significant role in sustainable selection of passive energy consumption optimisation strategies for United Kingdom buildings, consequently enhancing the realisation of critical Sustainable Development Goals, especially “Sustainable Cities and Communities”.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 115222"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124009481","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Passive energy consumption optimisation strategies are apt solutions to tackle the negative impacts of buildings on people and environment. However, the existence of numerous criteria has made the selection of suitable passive strategies very challenging and complicated, which is perhaps the reason for the scarcity of comprehensive studies that simultaneously consider all classes of selection criteria, especially technical, economic, and social ones. This study initially identifies the existing passive strategies and the criteria involved in their identification, weighting, ranking, and selection, with particular emphasis on buildings located in the United Kingdom. Questionnaire survey was utilised for data collection due to the reliance of specific selection criteria, such as “job creation”, on expert judgment. The gathered data were then analysed by the hybridisation of criteria importance through inter criteria correlation (CRITIC) and evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) fuzzy approaches. Based on the obtained results, “reduction of greenhouse gas emissions”, “being environmentally friendly”, “flammability”, and “reduction of energy consumption” were ranked as the most important selection criteria. Consequently, the best and most sustainable passive strategies were concluded to be “improving fenestration design of building, “air tightness improvement of building”, and “optimum design of building's insulation layer”, with final scores of 0.882, 0.876, and 0.828, respectively. The results obtained from this study can have a significant role in sustainable selection of passive energy consumption optimisation strategies for United Kingdom buildings, consequently enhancing the realisation of critical Sustainable Development Goals, especially “Sustainable Cities and Communities”.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Energy price uncertainty and renewable energy technological innovation: Evidence from listed Chinese firms The effects of personal comfort systems on sleep: A systematic review Repurposing electric vehicle batteries: State of art and challenges from repurposer perspective Snow impact on PV performance: Assessing the zero-output challenge in cold areas Integrating urban building energy modeling (UBEM) and urban-building environmental impact assessment (UB-EIA) for sustainable urban development: A comprehensive review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1