Selection of passive energy consumption optimisation strategies for buildings

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2024.115222
Amirhossein Balali, Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo
{"title":"Selection of passive energy consumption optimisation strategies for buildings","authors":"Amirhossein Balali,&nbsp;Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Passive energy consumption optimisation strategies are apt solutions to tackle the negative impacts of buildings on people and environment. However, the existence of numerous criteria has made the selection of suitable passive strategies very challenging and complicated, which is perhaps the reason for the scarcity of comprehensive studies that simultaneously consider all classes of selection criteria, especially technical, economic, and social ones. This study initially identifies the existing passive strategies and the criteria involved in their identification, weighting, ranking, and selection, with particular emphasis on buildings located in the United Kingdom. Questionnaire survey was utilised for data collection due to the reliance of specific selection criteria, such as “job creation”, on expert judgment. The gathered data were then analysed by the hybridisation of criteria importance through inter criteria correlation (CRITIC) and evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) fuzzy approaches. Based on the obtained results, “reduction of greenhouse gas emissions”, “being environmentally friendly”, “flammability”, and “reduction of energy consumption” were ranked as the most important selection criteria. Consequently, the best and most sustainable passive strategies were concluded to be “improving fenestration design of building, “air tightness improvement of building”, and “optimum design of building's insulation layer”, with final scores of 0.882, 0.876, and 0.828, respectively. The results obtained from this study can have a significant role in sustainable selection of passive energy consumption optimisation strategies for United Kingdom buildings, consequently enhancing the realisation of critical Sustainable Development Goals, especially “Sustainable Cities and Communities”.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 115222"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124009481","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Passive energy consumption optimisation strategies are apt solutions to tackle the negative impacts of buildings on people and environment. However, the existence of numerous criteria has made the selection of suitable passive strategies very challenging and complicated, which is perhaps the reason for the scarcity of comprehensive studies that simultaneously consider all classes of selection criteria, especially technical, economic, and social ones. This study initially identifies the existing passive strategies and the criteria involved in their identification, weighting, ranking, and selection, with particular emphasis on buildings located in the United Kingdom. Questionnaire survey was utilised for data collection due to the reliance of specific selection criteria, such as “job creation”, on expert judgment. The gathered data were then analysed by the hybridisation of criteria importance through inter criteria correlation (CRITIC) and evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) fuzzy approaches. Based on the obtained results, “reduction of greenhouse gas emissions”, “being environmentally friendly”, “flammability”, and “reduction of energy consumption” were ranked as the most important selection criteria. Consequently, the best and most sustainable passive strategies were concluded to be “improving fenestration design of building, “air tightness improvement of building”, and “optimum design of building's insulation layer”, with final scores of 0.882, 0.876, and 0.828, respectively. The results obtained from this study can have a significant role in sustainable selection of passive energy consumption optimisation strategies for United Kingdom buildings, consequently enhancing the realisation of critical Sustainable Development Goals, especially “Sustainable Cities and Communities”.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑被动式能耗优化策略的选择
被动式能源消耗优化策略是解决建筑物对人类和环境的负面影响的合适解决方案。然而,众多标准的存在使得选择合适的被动策略非常具有挑战性和复杂性,这可能是缺乏同时考虑所有类别选择标准,特别是技术,经济和社会标准的综合研究的原因。本研究最初确定了现有的被动策略和涉及其识别、加权、排名和选择的标准,特别强调了位于英国的建筑物。数据收集采用问卷调查,因为具体的选择标准,如“创造就业机会”,依赖于专家的判断。然后通过标准间相关性(critical)和基于平均解距离(EDAS)模糊方法的标准重要性杂交分析收集到的数据。根据获得的结果,“减少温室气体排放”、“环境友好”、“可燃性”和“减少能源消耗”被列为最重要的选择标准。最终得分分别为0.882、0.876和0.828,得出“改善建筑开窗设计”、“改善建筑气密性”和“优化建筑保温层设计”是最佳和最可持续的被动策略。从本研究中获得的结果可以在英国建筑被动能耗优化策略的可持续选择中发挥重要作用,从而增强关键可持续发展目标的实现,特别是“可持续城市和社区”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Collective decision-making in energy transitions: A systematic review and a way forward Advancements in superstructures design and solver approaches for heat and mass exchange network synthesis Recent advances for thermal management of electronic devices: A state-of-the-art review A state-of-the-art review on decarbonizing aerospace manufacturing with life cycle sustainability assessment Power-to-protein: Convergent carbon capture, renewable energy, and microbial biomanufacturing for sustainable food security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1