Systemic immune-inflammation index: Unveiling the diagnostic potential in ulcerative colitis through a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Anas Elgenidy , Omar Alomari , Tasbih Emad , Sara K. Kamal , Islam E. Al Ghanam , Aya Sherif , Mohammed Al-mahdi Al-kurdi , Abdallah A. Helal , Yusof Mohamed Omar , Mohamed Rafiek Ramadan
{"title":"Systemic immune-inflammation index: Unveiling the diagnostic potential in ulcerative colitis through a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Anas Elgenidy ,&nbsp;Omar Alomari ,&nbsp;Tasbih Emad ,&nbsp;Sara K. Kamal ,&nbsp;Islam E. Al Ghanam ,&nbsp;Aya Sherif ,&nbsp;Mohammed Al-mahdi Al-kurdi ,&nbsp;Abdallah A. Helal ,&nbsp;Yusof Mohamed Omar ,&nbsp;Mohamed Rafiek Ramadan","doi":"10.1016/j.gande.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with unpredictable colon and rectum inflammation episodes. Evaluating disease activity is essential for effective management. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a potential biomarker for assessing inflammation and disease severity in UC. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively assess the utility of SII in UC by analyzing its association with disease activity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases have been searched for relevant studies OpenMetaAnalyst software were utilized in the analysis. Furthermore, we conducted a diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) analysis using Meta-Disc version 2.0 software, employing a univariate model to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of SII.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included seven retrospective studies comprising 1127 UC patients and 686 healthy controls. Our analysis revealed a significantly higher SII in UC patients compared to healthy controls (mean difference: −620.00, 95 ​% CI -1337.08 – 97.07), indicating its potential as a diagnostic marker. SII was also significantly lower in UC patients in remission compared to those with active disease (mean difference: −521.71, 95 ​% CI -962.92 to −80.50), suggesting its role in monitoring disease activity. The DTA analysis demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.622 and specificity of 0.805 for SII in predicting UC activity, with a diagnostic odds ratio of 6.773.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our meta-analysis reveals that the SII holds significant promise as a non-invasive marker for assessing the activity and severity of UC. The findings demonstrate that SII is significantly lower in healthy controls compared to UC patients and lower in patients in remission compared to those with active disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100571,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 22-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949752324000621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with unpredictable colon and rectum inflammation episodes. Evaluating disease activity is essential for effective management. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a potential biomarker for assessing inflammation and disease severity in UC. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively assess the utility of SII in UC by analyzing its association with disease activity.

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases have been searched for relevant studies OpenMetaAnalyst software were utilized in the analysis. Furthermore, we conducted a diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) analysis using Meta-Disc version 2.0 software, employing a univariate model to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of SII.

Results

We included seven retrospective studies comprising 1127 UC patients and 686 healthy controls. Our analysis revealed a significantly higher SII in UC patients compared to healthy controls (mean difference: −620.00, 95 ​% CI -1337.08 – 97.07), indicating its potential as a diagnostic marker. SII was also significantly lower in UC patients in remission compared to those with active disease (mean difference: −521.71, 95 ​% CI -962.92 to −80.50), suggesting its role in monitoring disease activity. The DTA analysis demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.622 and specificity of 0.805 for SII in predicting UC activity, with a diagnostic odds ratio of 6.773.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis reveals that the SII holds significant promise as a non-invasive marker for assessing the activity and severity of UC. The findings demonstrate that SII is significantly lower in healthy controls compared to UC patients and lower in patients in remission compared to those with active disease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Alcohol-associated liver disease: A review Colorectal cancer spectrum: From subtypes and epidemiology to oncotherapies Evolution of mortality for stomach cancer during the past 20 years in the US The best beginning, a smooth process, and a bright future of gastroenterology & endoscopy Liver lobes and cirrhosis: Diagnostic insights from lobar ratios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1