Suicide risk estimation in bipolar disorder using N200 and P300 event-related potentials and machine learning: A pilot study

Chaewon Lee , Kathleen M. Gates , Jinsoo Chun , Raed Al Kontar , Masoud Kamali , Melvin G. McInnis , Patricia Deldin
{"title":"Suicide risk estimation in bipolar disorder using N200 and P300 event-related potentials and machine learning: A pilot study","authors":"Chaewon Lee ,&nbsp;Kathleen M. Gates ,&nbsp;Jinsoo Chun ,&nbsp;Raed Al Kontar ,&nbsp;Masoud Kamali ,&nbsp;Melvin G. McInnis ,&nbsp;Patricia Deldin","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2025.100875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) face an elevated suicide risk. While machine learning (ML) has been used to estimate suicide risk in BD, early predictors like demographics, past attempts, and self-reports are limited by their inability to provide individualized risk estimation, overemphasis on past attempters, and susceptibility to personal biases, underscoring the need for effective, objective markers. Event-related potentials (ERPs), widely studied in suicide research, remain unexplored in ML applications for BD. This pilot study applies ML to N200 and P300 ERP components from a response inhibition paradigm to estimate suicide risk in BD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We collected N200 and P300 peak amplitude and latency data from 57 Type I BD individuals (22 attempters and 35 non-attempters). Our two-stage ML approach employed adaptive Lasso logistic regression for feature selection, followed by deep neural network (DNN) modeling for classification. For post-hoc analysis, we used explainable AI to interpret ERP feature importance in top-performing DNN predictions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Key features were exclusively identified from latency data. Notably, N200 latency DNN models effectively distinguished attempters from non-attempters, achieving AUCs of 78.2–89.3 %. Explainable AI pinpointed a right visual hemifield Go stimuli-induced ERP from the left-parietal site as the most predictive.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our ERP-ML approach showed promising preliminary results, with N200 latency identified as a potential suicide marker in BD. Larger samples are required to validate these results. While findings are sample-specific, the methodological approach may have broader applicability and could inform future research to refine clinical strategies for detecting high-risk BD individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100875"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915325000058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) face an elevated suicide risk. While machine learning (ML) has been used to estimate suicide risk in BD, early predictors like demographics, past attempts, and self-reports are limited by their inability to provide individualized risk estimation, overemphasis on past attempters, and susceptibility to personal biases, underscoring the need for effective, objective markers. Event-related potentials (ERPs), widely studied in suicide research, remain unexplored in ML applications for BD. This pilot study applies ML to N200 and P300 ERP components from a response inhibition paradigm to estimate suicide risk in BD.

Methods

We collected N200 and P300 peak amplitude and latency data from 57 Type I BD individuals (22 attempters and 35 non-attempters). Our two-stage ML approach employed adaptive Lasso logistic regression for feature selection, followed by deep neural network (DNN) modeling for classification. For post-hoc analysis, we used explainable AI to interpret ERP feature importance in top-performing DNN predictions.

Results

Key features were exclusively identified from latency data. Notably, N200 latency DNN models effectively distinguished attempters from non-attempters, achieving AUCs of 78.2–89.3 %. Explainable AI pinpointed a right visual hemifield Go stimuli-induced ERP from the left-parietal site as the most predictive.

Conclusion

Our ERP-ML approach showed promising preliminary results, with N200 latency identified as a potential suicide marker in BD. Larger samples are required to validate these results. While findings are sample-specific, the methodological approach may have broader applicability and could inform future research to refine clinical strategies for detecting high-risk BD individuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Does interoceptive sensibility mediate the relationship between alexithymia and sleep quality? Heightened demand for mental health information resources during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Germany: A retrospective longitudinal analysis of helpline calls Ambulance attendances involving personality disorder – investigation of crisis-driven re-attendances for mental health, alcohol and other drug, and suicide-related events Study on the prediction model of non-suicidal self-injury behavior risk during hospitalization for adolescent inpatients with depression based on medical data. Prolonged grief and posttraumatic stress in parents who lost a child in a road traffic accident: A latent class analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1