“I could, but why should I?”: Entrepreneurial women's career pathways and how founding fits in (or doesn't)

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Business Venturing Insights Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jbvi.2025.e00516

Hana Milanov , Katharina Prantl , Sheri Sheppard , Xiao Ge

{"title":"“I could, but why should I?”: Entrepreneurial women's career pathways and how founding fits in (or doesn't)","authors":"Hana Milanov , Katharina Prantl , Sheri Sheppard , Xiao Ge","doi":"10.1016/j.jbvi.2025.e00516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Why do highly qualified women with entrepreneurial self-efficacy choose not to pursue tech-venture founding? We adopt a career-perspective and interview 17 female Stanford engineering graduates—women who possess high entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE), educational prestige, access to Silicon Valley's entrepreneurial networks, and who already overcame hurdles associated with entering and succeeding in a gender-incongruent setting. Despite these seemingly uniform conditions for tech entrepreneurship, we reveal four distinct career pathways: Skill Hunters, Life Masters, Strategists, and Idealists. While Skill Hunters remain attracted to entrepreneurship, the other groups are disillusioned with it, despite having experience as corporate entrepreneurs, business owners, and founders of not-for-profits. Our findings demonstrate how (in)congruency of women's career principles and context-based entrepreneurial outcome expectations shapes their entrepreneurial engagement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38078,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article e00516"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673425000034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why do highly qualified women with entrepreneurial self-efficacy choose not to pursue tech-venture founding? We adopt a career-perspective and interview 17 female Stanford engineering graduates—women who possess high entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE), educational prestige, access to Silicon Valley's entrepreneurial networks, and who already overcame hurdles associated with entering and succeeding in a gender-incongruent setting. Despite these seemingly uniform conditions for tech entrepreneurship, we reveal four distinct career pathways: Skill Hunters, Life Masters, Strategists, and Idealists. While Skill Hunters remain attracted to entrepreneurship, the other groups are disillusioned with it, despite having experience as corporate entrepreneurs, business owners, and founders of not-for-profits. Our findings demonstrate how (in)congruency of women's career principles and context-based entrepreneurial outcome expectations shapes their entrepreneurial engagement.

查看原文