The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in interproximal decay detection

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.023
Dr. Jennie Caldwell , Mr. Brandon Crowther , Dr. Anita Gohel
{"title":"The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in interproximal decay detection","authors":"Dr. Jennie Caldwell ,&nbsp;Mr. Brandon Crowther ,&nbsp;Dr. Anita Gohel","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Untreated caries are a prevalent health condition worldwide. Management of caries includes preventive and restoring teeth and function when necessary. In recent years, significant progress has been made with the introduction of artificial intelligence algorithms in dentistry, which includes diagnosis of incipient and advanced carious lesions. The objective of this study is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of Overjet Caries Assist (OCA), a radiologic automated concurrent read computer-assisted detection software, on incipient enamel and dentinal caries.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>In total, 1142 proximal surfaces were assessed in 200 bitewing images by an oral radiology resident and a calibrated dental student. The presence of incipient decay was recorded and then OCA was used. Caries successfully identified by the software, incorrectly identified, and missed lesions were recorded. The same process was then performed on 535 proximal surfaces in 50 bitewing images, and the presence of dentinal decay was recorded and the same recording process above was repeated. Sensitivity and specificity calculations were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The data revealed a sensitivity of nearly 70% for incipient caries and a specificity of approximately 98%. The sensitivity of dentin caries was found to be nearly 94%, with a specificity of 97%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In general, human sensitivity of detection of proximal carious lesions ranges from 24% to 43% and specificity is 89% to 97%. Our results indicate that OCA is overall accurate, with greater sensitivity and specificity on proximal carious lesions and markedly high sensitivity for dentinal lesions. Artificial intelligence models have the ability to provide a reliable tool in assisting in the diagnosis of caries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49010,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","volume":"139 3","pages":"Pages e75-e76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324008162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Untreated caries are a prevalent health condition worldwide. Management of caries includes preventive and restoring teeth and function when necessary. In recent years, significant progress has been made with the introduction of artificial intelligence algorithms in dentistry, which includes diagnosis of incipient and advanced carious lesions. The objective of this study is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of Overjet Caries Assist (OCA), a radiologic automated concurrent read computer-assisted detection software, on incipient enamel and dentinal caries.

Study Design

In total, 1142 proximal surfaces were assessed in 200 bitewing images by an oral radiology resident and a calibrated dental student. The presence of incipient decay was recorded and then OCA was used. Caries successfully identified by the software, incorrectly identified, and missed lesions were recorded. The same process was then performed on 535 proximal surfaces in 50 bitewing images, and the presence of dentinal decay was recorded and the same recording process above was repeated. Sensitivity and specificity calculations were performed.

Results

The data revealed a sensitivity of nearly 70% for incipient caries and a specificity of approximately 98%. The sensitivity of dentin caries was found to be nearly 94%, with a specificity of 97%.

Conclusion

In general, human sensitivity of detection of proximal carious lesions ranges from 24% to 43% and specificity is 89% to 97%. Our results indicate that OCA is overall accurate, with greater sensitivity and specificity on proximal carious lesions and markedly high sensitivity for dentinal lesions. Artificial intelligence models have the ability to provide a reliable tool in assisting in the diagnosis of caries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
1217
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology is required reading for anyone in the fields of oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology or advanced general practice dentistry. It is the only major dental journal that provides a practical and complete overview of the medical and surgical techniques of dental practice in four areas. Topics covered include such current issues as dental implants, treatment of HIV-infected patients, and evaluation and treatment of TMJ disorders. The official publication for nine societies, the Journal is recommended for initial purchase in the Brandon Hill study, Selected List of Books and Journals for the Small Medical Library.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Information for Readers Society Page Coronoid process: cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) evaluation and proposal of radiographic classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1