Sustainable business assessment of the gasification of solid recovered fuel for bread making

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy nexus Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nexus.2024.100326
Ziyad Tariq Abdullah
{"title":"Sustainable business assessment of the gasification of solid recovered fuel for bread making","authors":"Ziyad Tariq Abdullah","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2024.100326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Solid recovered fuel (SRF) is an alternative to fossil fuels that is produced from recovered municipal solid waste. SRF is often used to provide heat for energy-intensive industries, such as cement production. Here, the alternative use of SRF for industrial bread production is proposed for the first time. Five industrial bread-making portfolios based on SRF gasification were developed based on commercially available industrial machinery and technology. The developed industrial-scale alternatives were subjected to the cost and profit feasibility analyses to quantify their economic sustainability. The technical feasibility of SRF-fueled bread making was mathematically modelled considering the maturity of the industrial machinery. Regression plots were used to analyze the effects of the productivity (manufacturing scale) on the cost, power, syngas consumption, number of workers, and delivery cost of these relationships. Good consistency between the data in these plots, i.e., the machinery specifications, indicates a high level of technical maturity. Furthermore, the social sustainability was calculated based on the technical, employment, and human development potentials, where automated bread-making lines increase productivity, but reduce the required number of workers. Finally, a comprehensive sustainability performance index was evaluated by combining the technical, economic, environmental, and social indexes. The final sustainability index of 0.65 is very close to the threshold for a sustainable profitable business. The economic analysis showed that a maximum profit of 36,718 USD/day can be achieved based on the production of 1.5 t/h of bread, where cost can be lowered to 1630 USD/t by using SRF. Replacing traditional fossil-based gas fuels (liquid petroleum gas and liquid natural gas) by SRF-derived gas has both economic and environmental advantages, resulting in high economic and environmental sustainability indexes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100326"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427124000573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solid recovered fuel (SRF) is an alternative to fossil fuels that is produced from recovered municipal solid waste. SRF is often used to provide heat for energy-intensive industries, such as cement production. Here, the alternative use of SRF for industrial bread production is proposed for the first time. Five industrial bread-making portfolios based on SRF gasification were developed based on commercially available industrial machinery and technology. The developed industrial-scale alternatives were subjected to the cost and profit feasibility analyses to quantify their economic sustainability. The technical feasibility of SRF-fueled bread making was mathematically modelled considering the maturity of the industrial machinery. Regression plots were used to analyze the effects of the productivity (manufacturing scale) on the cost, power, syngas consumption, number of workers, and delivery cost of these relationships. Good consistency between the data in these plots, i.e., the machinery specifications, indicates a high level of technical maturity. Furthermore, the social sustainability was calculated based on the technical, employment, and human development potentials, where automated bread-making lines increase productivity, but reduce the required number of workers. Finally, a comprehensive sustainability performance index was evaluated by combining the technical, economic, environmental, and social indexes. The final sustainability index of 0.65 is very close to the threshold for a sustainable profitable business. The economic analysis showed that a maximum profit of 36,718 USD/day can be achieved based on the production of 1.5 t/h of bread, where cost can be lowered to 1630 USD/t by using SRF. Replacing traditional fossil-based gas fuels (liquid petroleum gas and liquid natural gas) by SRF-derived gas has both economic and environmental advantages, resulting in high economic and environmental sustainability indexes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
期刊最新文献
Development of macro and micro-nutrient rich integrated Jeevamrutha bio-fertilizer systems using rural and commercial precursors Maintenance techniques to increase solar energy production: A review Comparative analysis of environmental impact and energy consumption in sesame and mung bean production using life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis Enhancing sustainability through optimized adsorption using a novel Klason-lignin-based biosorbent derived from sugar-palm fruit shells for efficient removal of Pb(II) and Cd(II) Experimental and computational analyses of a photovoltaic module cooled with an optimized converging channel absorber
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1