Detection of mandibular molar furcation involvement on intraoral radiograph by machine learning

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.036
Dr. Fiondra Baldwin , Dr. Jared Cole , Mr. Jordan Welborn , Dr. Nic Herndon , Dr. Wenjian Zhang
{"title":"Detection of mandibular molar furcation involvement on intraoral radiograph by machine learning","authors":"Dr. Fiondra Baldwin ,&nbsp;Dr. Jared Cole ,&nbsp;Mr. Jordan Welborn ,&nbsp;Dr. Nic Herndon ,&nbsp;Dr. Wenjian Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) is speculated to help accomplish sophisticated human tasks owing to its rapid development. Radiology is at the forefront of health care specialties that are readily accessible by AI. There are studies investigating the accuracy of AI in diagnosis of dentoalveolar pathoses. However, not much is known if AI is able to detect molar furcation involvement (FI), a condition that may have limited clinic accessibility. The objective of the study is to evaluate the detection of mandibular molar FI on intraoral radiograph by machine learning.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>The school's Axium was screened and patients with or without mandibular molar FI were enrolled. Mandibular molar periapical radiographs were cropped into single tooth images and annotated manually as healthy or FI. The images were divided as training, validation and test sets. Multiple machine learning models were trained to identify FI. Images were fed into these classifiers and their diagnostic accuracy for molar FI was evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Preliminary, 55 healthy and 66 FI molars were evaluated. Twelve classifiers were modified and tested, which included neural net, RBF, SVM, Adaboost, QDA, decision tree, random forest, nearest neighbors, logistic regression, Gaussian process, linear SVM, and naive Bayes. They demonstrated accuracy in the range of 45% to 60%, with random forest performing the best with 60% accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Machine learning seems to be a promising tool in detection of mandibular molar FI on intraoral radiograph. Larger sample size is needed to further improve the diagnostic performance of the algorithms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49010,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","volume":"139 3","pages":"Page e81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324008290","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Artificial intelligence (AI) is speculated to help accomplish sophisticated human tasks owing to its rapid development. Radiology is at the forefront of health care specialties that are readily accessible by AI. There are studies investigating the accuracy of AI in diagnosis of dentoalveolar pathoses. However, not much is known if AI is able to detect molar furcation involvement (FI), a condition that may have limited clinic accessibility. The objective of the study is to evaluate the detection of mandibular molar FI on intraoral radiograph by machine learning.

Study Design

The school's Axium was screened and patients with or without mandibular molar FI were enrolled. Mandibular molar periapical radiographs were cropped into single tooth images and annotated manually as healthy or FI. The images were divided as training, validation and test sets. Multiple machine learning models were trained to identify FI. Images were fed into these classifiers and their diagnostic accuracy for molar FI was evaluated.

Results

Preliminary, 55 healthy and 66 FI molars were evaluated. Twelve classifiers were modified and tested, which included neural net, RBF, SVM, Adaboost, QDA, decision tree, random forest, nearest neighbors, logistic regression, Gaussian process, linear SVM, and naive Bayes. They demonstrated accuracy in the range of 45% to 60%, with random forest performing the best with 60% accuracy.

Conclusion

Machine learning seems to be a promising tool in detection of mandibular molar FI on intraoral radiograph. Larger sample size is needed to further improve the diagnostic performance of the algorithms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
1217
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology is required reading for anyone in the fields of oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology or advanced general practice dentistry. It is the only major dental journal that provides a practical and complete overview of the medical and surgical techniques of dental practice in four areas. Topics covered include such current issues as dental implants, treatment of HIV-infected patients, and evaluation and treatment of TMJ disorders. The official publication for nine societies, the Journal is recommended for initial purchase in the Brandon Hill study, Selected List of Books and Journals for the Small Medical Library.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Information for Readers Society Page Coronoid process: cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) evaluation and proposal of radiographic classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1