Evaluation of transit-oriented development based on 9D’s approach in developing countries context

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.01.010
Sriram Mangu , B. Raghuram Kadali , Saladi S.V. Subbarao , Jen-Jia Lin
{"title":"Evaluation of transit-oriented development based on 9D’s approach in developing countries context","authors":"Sriram Mangu ,&nbsp;B. Raghuram Kadali ,&nbsp;Saladi S.V. Subbarao ,&nbsp;Jen-Jia Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.01.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) involves meticulously planned urban development, typically around metro stations, to initiate sustainable outcomes. However, this integrated urban and transportation planning requires a thorough evaluation of the station areas, which is currently lacking in the case of developing world. This work seeks to construct a TOD index using the proposed 9-D criteria which includes density, diversity, design, distance to transit, destination accessibility, demand management, desirability of transit, dissonance, and deference to the environment for evaluating and classifying ten station areas of Hyderabad (India) into different TOD types. The indicators were selected via a Delphi survey, which, with the input of experts' opinions, ranked the indicators according to 9 parameters and narrowed the field down to 27 key indicators. A Best-Worst Method (BWM) has been adopted to carry out the evaluation, while k-means clustering technique is used to classify the station areas. The station areas are assessed in terms of transit status, orientation status, and development status. Using this, certain policy suggestions can be devised for each TOD type to ensure more sustainable outcomes. An increase in TOD-ness through a ground-level manipulation of the TOD criteria is more likely to be a greater success in fulfilling the TOD policy goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"163 ","pages":"Pages 138-151"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25000101","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) involves meticulously planned urban development, typically around metro stations, to initiate sustainable outcomes. However, this integrated urban and transportation planning requires a thorough evaluation of the station areas, which is currently lacking in the case of developing world. This work seeks to construct a TOD index using the proposed 9-D criteria which includes density, diversity, design, distance to transit, destination accessibility, demand management, desirability of transit, dissonance, and deference to the environment for evaluating and classifying ten station areas of Hyderabad (India) into different TOD types. The indicators were selected via a Delphi survey, which, with the input of experts' opinions, ranked the indicators according to 9 parameters and narrowed the field down to 27 key indicators. A Best-Worst Method (BWM) has been adopted to carry out the evaluation, while k-means clustering technique is used to classify the station areas. The station areas are assessed in terms of transit status, orientation status, and development status. Using this, certain policy suggestions can be devised for each TOD type to ensure more sustainable outcomes. An increase in TOD-ness through a ground-level manipulation of the TOD criteria is more likely to be a greater success in fulfilling the TOD policy goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于9D方法的发展中国家交通导向发展评价
交通导向发展(TOD)涉及精心规划的城市发展,通常围绕地铁站,以启动可持续的结果。然而,这种综合的城市和运输规划需要对车站区域进行彻底的评价,而这在发展中国家目前是缺乏的。这项工作旨在利用提出的9-D标准构建TOD指数,包括密度、多样性、设计、到交通的距离、目的地可达性、需求管理、交通的可取性、不和谐性和对环境的尊重,以评估和分类海德拉巴(印度)的10个车站区域为不同的TOD类型。指标的选择采用德尔菲法(Delphi survey),在专家意见的输入下,根据9个参数对指标进行排名,并将范围缩小到27个关键指标。采用Best-Worst Method (BWM)进行评价,采用k-means聚类技术对站点区域进行分类。对车站区域的交通状况、定位状况和发展状况进行了评估。利用这一点,可以为每种TOD类型设计某些政策建议,以确保更可持续的结果。通过对TOD标准的基层操作来增加TOD程度,更有可能在实现TOD政策目标方面取得更大的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Impact of cycle lanes and public bike parking on bicycle commuting: How to achieve France’s cycling mode share target? Delivering accessible school transportation services in Canada's Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area: A study of education professionals' perspectives Differences in future car-purchase intentions between undergraduates from car-owning households and non-car households Rethinking corporate mobility management: Enhancing employee loyalty through corporate mobility and transportation offerings Port group integration and regional high-quality economic development: Mechanisms and spatial effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1