Digging and building: How transformative mixed-methods research contributes to explaining and responding to educational exclusion and school dropout

Tabata Contreras-Villalobos , Enrique Baleriola Escudero , Verónica López Leiva
{"title":"Digging and building: How transformative mixed-methods research contributes to explaining and responding to educational exclusion and school dropout","authors":"Tabata Contreras-Villalobos ,&nbsp;Enrique Baleriola Escudero ,&nbsp;Verónica López Leiva","doi":"10.1016/j.metip.2024.100170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transformative mixed-methods research (T-MMR) provides an integrated understanding of social issues while simultaneously working toward their transformation. This paper illustrates how this approach deals with urgent problems affecting vulnerable groups that experience socioeducational inequality, focusing on educational exclusion and school dropout in youth and adult education in Chile. Using the metaphor of digging and building, this study explores how T-MMR facilitates a comprehensive approach by integrating qualitative and quantitative methods to understand and respond to these issues from an educational psychology perspective. Findings show that through digging (QUAN-QUAL), educational exclusion is rooted in systemic inequalities, with marginalized students facing persistent barriers that the education system fails to adequately address. However, the strength of T-MMR lies in not only revealing these challenges but also co-creating practical solutions. That is what we call building. To deepen our understanding of school dropout, this phase consisted of an integration of quantitative and qualitative data and collaborative work with students, teachers, and policymakers, creating a particular and precise response. Finally, this research highlights the value of T-MMR for engaging communities in both understanding (digging) and reshaping (building) educational practices, offering a transformative pathway toward a more just and responsive education system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93338,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260124000365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transformative mixed-methods research (T-MMR) provides an integrated understanding of social issues while simultaneously working toward their transformation. This paper illustrates how this approach deals with urgent problems affecting vulnerable groups that experience socioeducational inequality, focusing on educational exclusion and school dropout in youth and adult education in Chile. Using the metaphor of digging and building, this study explores how T-MMR facilitates a comprehensive approach by integrating qualitative and quantitative methods to understand and respond to these issues from an educational psychology perspective. Findings show that through digging (QUAN-QUAL), educational exclusion is rooted in systemic inequalities, with marginalized students facing persistent barriers that the education system fails to adequately address. However, the strength of T-MMR lies in not only revealing these challenges but also co-creating practical solutions. That is what we call building. To deepen our understanding of school dropout, this phase consisted of an integration of quantitative and qualitative data and collaborative work with students, teachers, and policymakers, creating a particular and precise response. Finally, this research highlights the value of T-MMR for engaging communities in both understanding (digging) and reshaping (building) educational practices, offering a transformative pathway toward a more just and responsive education system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Methods in Psychology (Online)
Methods in Psychology (Online) Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing daily life activities with experience sampling methodology (ESM): Scoring predefined categories or qualitative analysis of open-ended responses? The role of sampling in an explanatory sequential mixed methods study: General applications of the transformative paradigm “Making Positive Vibrations” in a mixed methods study of covert bullying: A transformative methodological framework for social justice Editorial Board Digging and building: How transformative mixed-methods research contributes to explaining and responding to educational exclusion and school dropout
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1