Responsibility, resentment, and red tape: Exploring stigma experiences among assistance program users in Missouri

IF 2.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SSM. Qualitative research in health Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100511
A. Terhaar , E.K. Barnidge , M. Somheil , H. Bednarek
{"title":"Responsibility, resentment, and red tape: Exploring stigma experiences among assistance program users in Missouri","authors":"A. Terhaar ,&nbsp;E.K. Barnidge ,&nbsp;M. Somheil ,&nbsp;H. Bednarek","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although assistance programs (i.e. Medicaid, SNAP, and food pantries) are proven to ensure access to necessary resources and improve health outcomes, evidence shows that participants experience stigma due to their participation in these programs, creating barriers to participation and further marginalization of low-income families. In the U.S., welfare stigma is rooted in values of personal responsibility that perpetuate harmful stereotypes about assistance users. Internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma are manifestations of stigma that may be experienced by assistance users.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>One-on-one, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a geographically stratified sample of adult Medicaid participants in Missouri (n = 72). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using inductive and deductive coding. Thematic content analysis was employed to derive and report the main themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among our sample, internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma were experienced through the value of personal responsibility, program design and implementation, and program utilization. Through the value of personal responsibility, participants shared feelings of shame related to using public assistance (internalized stigma) and exceptionalism when comparing themselves to other users of public assistance (interpersonal stigma). Within program implementation, participants reported the prejudice they experienced through interactions with programmatic staff (interpersonal stigma) and described experiencing administrative barriers to accessing programs (structural stigma). Lastly, participants discussed how stigma influenced their utilization of public assistance programs, including decisions to enroll and engage in programs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study adds to existing understanding about how assistance users experience stigma and how internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma impact assistance program uptake and utilization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524001203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although assistance programs (i.e. Medicaid, SNAP, and food pantries) are proven to ensure access to necessary resources and improve health outcomes, evidence shows that participants experience stigma due to their participation in these programs, creating barriers to participation and further marginalization of low-income families. In the U.S., welfare stigma is rooted in values of personal responsibility that perpetuate harmful stereotypes about assistance users. Internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma are manifestations of stigma that may be experienced by assistance users.

Methods

One-on-one, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a geographically stratified sample of adult Medicaid participants in Missouri (n = 72). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using inductive and deductive coding. Thematic content analysis was employed to derive and report the main themes.

Results

Among our sample, internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma were experienced through the value of personal responsibility, program design and implementation, and program utilization. Through the value of personal responsibility, participants shared feelings of shame related to using public assistance (internalized stigma) and exceptionalism when comparing themselves to other users of public assistance (interpersonal stigma). Within program implementation, participants reported the prejudice they experienced through interactions with programmatic staff (interpersonal stigma) and described experiencing administrative barriers to accessing programs (structural stigma). Lastly, participants discussed how stigma influenced their utilization of public assistance programs, including decisions to enroll and engage in programs.

Conclusion

Our study adds to existing understanding about how assistance users experience stigma and how internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma impact assistance program uptake and utilization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
责任、怨恨和繁文缛节:探索密苏里州援助计划使用者的耻辱经历
尽管援助项目(即医疗补助、SNAP和食品储藏室)已被证明可以确保获得必要的资源并改善健康状况,但有证据表明,参与者因参与这些项目而感到耻辱,这为参与创造了障碍,并进一步使低收入家庭边缘化。在美国,福利耻辱根植于个人责任的价值观,这种价值观使对援助使用者的有害刻板印象永久化。内化的、人际的和结构性的耻辱感是耻辱感的表现形式,这些耻辱感可能是帮助使用者所经历的。方法对密苏里州成人医疗补助计划参与者进行一对一、半结构化访谈(n = 72)。访谈被逐字记录下来,并使用归纳和演绎编码进行分析。采用主题内容分析法推导和报道主题。结果在我们的样本中,内化、人际和结构性耻辱感通过个人责任价值、项目设计和实施以及项目利用来体验。通过个人责任的价值,参与者分享了与使用公共援助相关的羞耻感(内化耻辱感)和与其他公共援助使用者相比的例外论(人际耻辱感)。在项目实施过程中,参与者报告了他们在与项目工作人员的互动中所经历的偏见(人际污名),并描述了在参与项目时遇到的行政障碍(结构性污名)。最后,与会者讨论了耻辱如何影响他们对公共援助计划的利用,包括注册和参与计划的决定。结论我们的研究增加了对援助使用者如何经历耻辱以及内化、人际和结构性耻辱如何影响援助计划的吸收和利用的现有理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
期刊最新文献
Drive with me: Utilizing car-based mobile interviews to investigate place and health Racism in maternity care as a determinant of First Nations women's health: a qualitative study with First Nations women and families in the Australian Capital Territory Factors shaping PLHIV bypassing of primary anti-retroviral therapy (ART) facilities, adherence to ART medications and treatment regimens Doulas and acompañantes: Non-clinical abortion support after Dobbs Social support through shared experiences: An exploratory analysis of various manifestations, reasons, and outcomes of implant patients interacting with other patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1