Impaired face-to-face interaction and emotional energy in cochlear implant usage: Strategies for social inclusion in everyday life among young people with hearing loss

IF 2.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SSM. Qualitative research in health Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100512
Kim Sune Karrasch Jepsen, Inge Kryger Pedersen
{"title":"Impaired face-to-face interaction and emotional energy in cochlear implant usage: Strategies for social inclusion in everyday life among young people with hearing loss","authors":"Kim Sune Karrasch Jepsen,&nbsp;Inge Kryger Pedersen","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cochlear implantation is a standardized medical treatment for children and adolescents with severe to profound hearing loss. Medico-clinical research reports good communicative outcomes, especially for those individuals implanted early and who receive aural-verbal habilitation. However, as revealed by studies of other groups with hearing loss, research into pragmatic skills finds variable conversational problems, and quantitative psychosocial studies report more difficulties compared with hearing control groups. These findings pose questions about how everyday social interaction and participation in key settings of socialization occur outside test settings. Developing micro-sociological explanations from Erving Goffman's work and theories of ritual interaction, this article presents a framework that explains problematic findings as resulting from micro-interactional barriers in face-to-face situations. Informal group situations and noise make participants fall out of sync in their interactions, which facilitates micro-social exclusion and defensive strategies. This explanation is qualified in the context of Denmark with an interview-based analysis of how young adults implanted as children have experienced micro-barriers across school trajectories and informal group participations. Furthermore, their experiences suggest that domains of matchup, including multi-modal communication, can be decisive for supporting social participation of children and adolescents with hearing loss in mainstream society.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100512"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524001215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cochlear implantation is a standardized medical treatment for children and adolescents with severe to profound hearing loss. Medico-clinical research reports good communicative outcomes, especially for those individuals implanted early and who receive aural-verbal habilitation. However, as revealed by studies of other groups with hearing loss, research into pragmatic skills finds variable conversational problems, and quantitative psychosocial studies report more difficulties compared with hearing control groups. These findings pose questions about how everyday social interaction and participation in key settings of socialization occur outside test settings. Developing micro-sociological explanations from Erving Goffman's work and theories of ritual interaction, this article presents a framework that explains problematic findings as resulting from micro-interactional barriers in face-to-face situations. Informal group situations and noise make participants fall out of sync in their interactions, which facilitates micro-social exclusion and defensive strategies. This explanation is qualified in the context of Denmark with an interview-based analysis of how young adults implanted as children have experienced micro-barriers across school trajectories and informal group participations. Furthermore, their experiences suggest that domains of matchup, including multi-modal communication, can be decisive for supporting social participation of children and adolescents with hearing loss in mainstream society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耳蜗植入使用中面对面互动和情绪能量受损:听力损失年轻人日常生活中的社会包容策略
人工耳蜗植入术是儿童和青少年重度至重度听力损失的一种标准化医疗方法。医学临床研究报告了良好的交流结果,特别是对于那些早期植入和接受听觉语言训练的个体。然而,正如对其他听力损失群体的研究所揭示的那样,对语用技能的研究发现了各种各样的会话问题,定量的社会心理研究报告了与听力对照组相比更多的困难。这些发现提出了一个问题,即日常的社会互动和参与社会化的关键环境是如何在测试环境之外发生的。本文从欧文·戈夫曼(Erving Goffman)的工作和仪式互动理论中发展出微观社会学解释,提出了一个框架来解释面对面情境中微观互动障碍所导致的问题。非正式的群体环境和噪音使参与者在互动中不同步,这促进了微观社会排斥和防御策略。在丹麦的背景下,这种解释是有资格的,基于访谈的分析是关于年轻人如何在儿童时期被植入学校轨迹和非正式群体参与中经历微障碍的。此外,他们的经验表明,包括多模式沟通在内的匹配领域对于支持听力损失儿童和青少年在主流社会中的社会参与具有决定性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
期刊最新文献
Drive with me: Utilizing car-based mobile interviews to investigate place and health Racism in maternity care as a determinant of First Nations women's health: a qualitative study with First Nations women and families in the Australian Capital Territory Factors shaping PLHIV bypassing of primary anti-retroviral therapy (ART) facilities, adherence to ART medications and treatment regimens Doulas and acompañantes: Non-clinical abortion support after Dobbs Social support through shared experiences: An exploratory analysis of various manifestations, reasons, and outcomes of implant patients interacting with other patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1