Living documents: A longitudinal data collection method for health services research

IF 2.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SSM. Qualitative research in health Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100513
Madelyn daSilva , Sameth Taro Hang , Shannon L. Sibbald
{"title":"Living documents: A longitudinal data collection method for health services research","authors":"Madelyn daSilva ,&nbsp;Sameth Taro Hang ,&nbsp;Shannon L. Sibbald","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Qualitative research tools offer health sciences researchers the ability to understand complex, varied, and nuanced facets of an individual's lived experiences. Several of these tools include observations, interviews, and focus groups, each with its own advantages and limitations. We created an alternative tool, the Living Document, an iterative, longitudinal, open-ended, and adaptable questionnaire that overcomes the barriers presented by other qualitative research tools. The Living Documents allows researchers to better understand and familiarize themselves with the research context, understand change over time, and capture the perspectives of research participants. As a proof of concept, the Living Document was employed within a chronic disease program embedded within primary care called the Best Care COPD (BCC) program to better understand its growth and implementation in new patient sites. Given the iterative and sequential nature of the tool employed within the BCC program, its compatibility with other data collection tools, and its longitudinal use, the Living Document was shown to be a valuable tool for the field of health sciences and for implementation research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524001227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Qualitative research tools offer health sciences researchers the ability to understand complex, varied, and nuanced facets of an individual's lived experiences. Several of these tools include observations, interviews, and focus groups, each with its own advantages and limitations. We created an alternative tool, the Living Document, an iterative, longitudinal, open-ended, and adaptable questionnaire that overcomes the barriers presented by other qualitative research tools. The Living Documents allows researchers to better understand and familiarize themselves with the research context, understand change over time, and capture the perspectives of research participants. As a proof of concept, the Living Document was employed within a chronic disease program embedded within primary care called the Best Care COPD (BCC) program to better understand its growth and implementation in new patient sites. Given the iterative and sequential nature of the tool employed within the BCC program, its compatibility with other data collection tools, and its longitudinal use, the Living Document was shown to be a valuable tool for the field of health sciences and for implementation research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生活文件:卫生服务研究的纵向数据收集方法
定性研究工具为健康科学研究人员提供了理解个人生活经历的复杂、多样和微妙方面的能力。其中一些工具包括观察、访谈和焦点小组,每种工具都有自己的优点和局限性。我们创建了一个可替代的工具,活文档,一个迭代的,纵向的,开放式的,适应性强的问卷,克服了其他定性研究工具所存在的障碍。生活文件使研究人员能够更好地了解和熟悉研究背景,了解随时间的变化,并捕捉研究参与者的观点。作为一种概念验证,《生活文件》被用于初级保健中一个名为“最佳慢性阻塞性肺病护理”(Best care COPD, BCC)的慢性病项目,以更好地了解该项目在新患者地区的发展和实施情况。鉴于BCC计划中使用的工具的迭代和顺序性质,它与其他数据收集工具的兼容性,以及它的纵向使用,活体文件被证明是健康科学领域和实施研究的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
期刊最新文献
Women's perspectives on acute cystitis care and the role of the community pharmacy: a qualitative study Empowering people and communities? The power of stories in asset-based approaches to health inequalities Responding to COVID-19 through participation. The Cuban experience of community engagement From shared values through creative refusal and contemporary pragmatism: Enacting culturally and contextually appropriate palliative care services in a South African hospice service Initiating difficult conversations, supporting patient agency, and discussing death: Do you want to talk about what this means?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1