Determinants of mini-electric vehicle adoption: Insights from early-adopters in China

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.01.017
Danting Zhao , Yuandong Liu , Shaoxuan Zhu , Jinglei Chi
{"title":"Determinants of mini-electric vehicle adoption: Insights from early-adopters in China","authors":"Danting Zhao ,&nbsp;Yuandong Liu ,&nbsp;Shaoxuan Zhu ,&nbsp;Jinglei Chi","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.01.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mini-electric vehicles (mini-EVs) have gained popularity in China. However, there has been no research on this new vehicle type. This study fills this gap by examining the determinants and differences in adoption behavior between mini- and full-size EVs. An integrated method of binary logit regression and stepwise forward regression indicated that seven factors determine mini-EV adoption (battery type, travel purpose, commute time, travel demand, battery degradation anxiety, purchase price, and official top speed). Based on this, three profiles are identified for mini-EV adopters (high-cost, long-commute, and multi-purpose adopters), while four profiles are identified for full-size EV adopters (lithium iron phosphate—low demand, short-time commute, ternary lithium-ion—low cost, and ternary lithium-ion—high cost adopters) by latent profile analysis. It is also found that mini-EV adopters have common misperceptions about the vehicle's official top speed and rated seating capacity. This study provides fresh insights into mini-EVs and offers policy guidance for the diffusion of this new type of vehicle.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"163 ","pages":"Pages 298-309"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25000174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mini-electric vehicles (mini-EVs) have gained popularity in China. However, there has been no research on this new vehicle type. This study fills this gap by examining the determinants and differences in adoption behavior between mini- and full-size EVs. An integrated method of binary logit regression and stepwise forward regression indicated that seven factors determine mini-EV adoption (battery type, travel purpose, commute time, travel demand, battery degradation anxiety, purchase price, and official top speed). Based on this, three profiles are identified for mini-EV adopters (high-cost, long-commute, and multi-purpose adopters), while four profiles are identified for full-size EV adopters (lithium iron phosphate—low demand, short-time commute, ternary lithium-ion—low cost, and ternary lithium-ion—high cost adopters) by latent profile analysis. It is also found that mini-EV adopters have common misperceptions about the vehicle's official top speed and rated seating capacity. This study provides fresh insights into mini-EVs and offers policy guidance for the diffusion of this new type of vehicle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微型电动汽车采用的决定因素:来自中国早期采用者的见解
迷你电动汽车(mini- ev)在中国越来越受欢迎。然而,目前还没有关于这种新型车辆的研究。本研究通过研究迷你和全尺寸电动汽车在采用行为上的决定因素和差异来填补这一空白。采用二元logit回归和逐步正回归相结合的方法,分析了影响迷你电动汽车使用的7个因素(电池类型、出行目的、通勤时间、出行需求、电池退化焦虑、购买价格和官方最高车速)。在此基础上,通过潜在特征分析,确定了小型电动汽车采用者的三种特征(高成本、长通勤和多用途采用者),而全尺寸电动汽车采用者的四种特征(磷酸铁锂-低需求、短通勤、三元锂离子低成本和三元锂离子高成本采用者)。研究还发现,迷你电动汽车的采用者对车辆的官方最高速度和额定座位容量有普遍的误解。这项研究为微型电动汽车提供了新的见解,并为这种新型汽车的推广提供了政策指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Delivering accessible school transportation services in Canada's Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area: A study of education professionals' perspectives Differences in future car-purchase intentions between undergraduates from car-owning households and non-car households Rethinking corporate mobility management: Enhancing employee loyalty through corporate mobility and transportation offerings Port group integration and regional high-quality economic development: Mechanisms and spatial effects Rethinking cost–benefit analysis for transformative cycling policies: Integrating behavioral change and the logsum method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1