Clearance rates and diarrhetic shellfish toxin accumulation by North Atlantic bivalves fed on North American strains of Dinophysis acuminata

IF 4.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Marine pollution bulletin Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.117613
Bradley T. McGuire , Marta P. Sanderson , Juliette L. Smith , Christopher J. Gobler
{"title":"Clearance rates and diarrhetic shellfish toxin accumulation by North Atlantic bivalves fed on North American strains of Dinophysis acuminata","authors":"Bradley T. McGuire ,&nbsp;Marta P. Sanderson ,&nbsp;Juliette L. Smith ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Gobler","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.117613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Filter feeding bivalves exposed to the harmful algal bloom (HAB) genus, <em>Dinophysis</em>, become intoxicated by the uptake of diarrhetic shellfish toxins (DSTs) produced by these phytoplankton. Here, three species of bivalve (<em>Crassostrea virginica</em>, <em>Mercenaria mercenaria</em>, and <em>Mytilus edulis</em>) native to the western North Atlantic were exposed to two North American strains of toxigenic <em>Dinophysis acuminata</em> to assess the impacts of cell density, cell density as a fraction of the total plankton community, and differing <em>Dinophysis</em> prey (i.e. strains of the ciliate, <em>Mesodinium rubrum</em>) on bivalve clearance rates. All bivalves cleared <em>D. acuminata</em> faster when the dinoflagellate was offered at moderate densities (10,000 cells L<sup>−1</sup>) as compared to high densities (100,000 cells L<sup>−1</sup>). <em>C. virginica</em> cleared a more toxic Massachusetts strain of <em>D. acuminata</em> significantly faster than a less toxic New York strain (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). When presented with <em>Dinophysis</em> in mixed culture with the non-HAB species, <em>Rhodomonas salina,</em> in varying proportions, <em>C. virginica</em> clearance rates slowed significantly as the relative and absolute abundance of <em>D. acuminata</em> increased (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), whereas <em>M. edulis</em> displayed a preference for the algae that was more abundant. While <em>C. virginica</em> and <em>M. edulis</em> cleared <em>R. salina</em> significantly faster than <em>M. mercenaria</em> (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), there were no differences in the clearance rates of <em>D. acuminata</em> among bivalves. In an additional experiment where <em>M. edulis</em> was exposed to a constant, density (∼ 15,000 cells L<sup>−1</sup>) of <em>D. acuminata</em> for 36 h and then fed a non-toxic food source for 24 h to quantify toxin accumulation and depuration, mussels rapidly accumulated DSTs and pectenotoxins (PTXs) during exposure to <em>Dinophysis</em> but depurated PTXs at a rate 3–14 times faster than DSTs (<em>p</em> = 0.07). Collectively, this study demonstrates that the accumulation of DSTs in bivalves varies as a function of <em>D. acuminata</em> density, species, and strain, and that feeding characteristics of, and toxin dynamics within, <em>M. edulis</em> make it more vulnerable to DST accumulation than <em>C. virginica</em> and a likely DST vector in bloom-prone regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18215,"journal":{"name":"Marine pollution bulletin","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 117613"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine pollution bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X25000888","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Filter feeding bivalves exposed to the harmful algal bloom (HAB) genus, Dinophysis, become intoxicated by the uptake of diarrhetic shellfish toxins (DSTs) produced by these phytoplankton. Here, three species of bivalve (Crassostrea virginica, Mercenaria mercenaria, and Mytilus edulis) native to the western North Atlantic were exposed to two North American strains of toxigenic Dinophysis acuminata to assess the impacts of cell density, cell density as a fraction of the total plankton community, and differing Dinophysis prey (i.e. strains of the ciliate, Mesodinium rubrum) on bivalve clearance rates. All bivalves cleared D. acuminata faster when the dinoflagellate was offered at moderate densities (10,000 cells L−1) as compared to high densities (100,000 cells L−1). C. virginica cleared a more toxic Massachusetts strain of D. acuminata significantly faster than a less toxic New York strain (p < 0.05). When presented with Dinophysis in mixed culture with the non-HAB species, Rhodomonas salina, in varying proportions, C. virginica clearance rates slowed significantly as the relative and absolute abundance of D. acuminata increased (p < 0.05), whereas M. edulis displayed a preference for the algae that was more abundant. While C. virginica and M. edulis cleared R. salina significantly faster than M. mercenaria (p < 0.05), there were no differences in the clearance rates of D. acuminata among bivalves. In an additional experiment where M. edulis was exposed to a constant, density (∼ 15,000 cells L−1) of D. acuminata for 36 h and then fed a non-toxic food source for 24 h to quantify toxin accumulation and depuration, mussels rapidly accumulated DSTs and pectenotoxins (PTXs) during exposure to Dinophysis but depurated PTXs at a rate 3–14 times faster than DSTs (p = 0.07). Collectively, this study demonstrates that the accumulation of DSTs in bivalves varies as a function of D. acuminata density, species, and strain, and that feeding characteristics of, and toxin dynamics within, M. edulis make it more vulnerable to DST accumulation than C. virginica and a likely DST vector in bloom-prone regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北大西洋双壳类动物以北美尖藻为食的清除率和腹泻性贝类毒素积累
暴露于有害藻华(HAB)属的滤食性双壳类动物,因吸收这些浮游植物产生的腹泻性贝类毒素(DSTs)而中毒。本研究以北大西洋西部的三种双壳类(珍珠贝、佣兵和紫贻贝)为研究对象,对两种北美产毒尖藻(Dinophysis acuminata)进行了细胞密度、细胞密度占总浮游生物群落的比例以及不同的尖藻猎物(如纤毛虫、红绒中纹)对双壳类清除率的影响进行了研究。当双鞭毛藻以中等密度(10,000个细胞L−1)提供时,与高密度(100,000个细胞L−1)相比,所有双壳类动物清除尖锐裂裂螨的速度更快。C. virginica清除一种毒性更强的D. acuminata马萨诸塞州菌株的速度明显快于毒性较小的纽约菌株(p <;0.05)。当与非赤潮藻属盐红单胞菌(Rhodomonas salina)以不同比例混合培养时,随着D. acuminata相对丰度和绝对丰度的增加,C. virginica清除率显著降低(p <;0.05),而M. edulis则偏爱更丰富的藻类。而锦绣金缕草和毛蕊草清除盐碱病的速度明显快于锦绣金缕草(p <;0.05),不同双壳类动物对尖锐裂裂螨的清除率差异无统计学意义。在另一项实验中,将M. edulis暴露在恒定密度(约15,000个细胞L−1)的尖藻中36小时,然后喂食无毒食物源24小时以量化毒素积累和净化,贻贝在暴露于尖藻过程中迅速积累DSTs和pectenotoxins (PTXs),但净化PTXs的速度比DSTs快3-14倍(p = 0.07)。总的来说,本研究表明,双壳类动物中DSTs的积累随acuminata密度、种类和品系的变化而变化,并且毛毛螺的摄食特征和毒素动态使其比C. virginica更容易受到DST积累的影响,而C. virginica在容易开花的地区可能是DST的载体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Marine pollution bulletin
Marine pollution bulletin 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
15.50%
发文量
1077
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Marine Pollution Bulletin is concerned with the rational use of maritime and marine resources in estuaries, the seas and oceans, as well as with documenting marine pollution and introducing new forms of measurement and analysis. A wide range of topics are discussed as news, comment, reviews and research reports, not only on effluent disposal and pollution control, but also on the management, economic aspects and protection of the marine environment in general.
期刊最新文献
Empathy fatigue in ecosystem conservation: The awareness decline among concerns over Japan's nuclear wastewater discharge Characterization and temporal variation of microplastics in surface waters and sediments of the lower Lurín River basin, Peru Stochastic and deterministic processes jointly govern bacterial community assembly along a heterogeneous mangrove degradation gradient Multi-class contaminants of emerging concern in threatened coastal elasmobranchs: Novel evidence of early-life exposure in southeastern Brazil Application of multi-resolution techniques, intelligent classification and semantic data fusion for the identification of oil spills in SAR imagery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1