Assessment methodology for the resilience of energy systems in positive energy buildings

Chiho Jimba, Yutaro Akimoto, Keiichi Okajima
{"title":"Assessment methodology for the resilience of energy systems in positive energy buildings","authors":"Chiho Jimba,&nbsp;Yutaro Akimoto,&nbsp;Keiichi Okajima","doi":"10.1016/j.prime.2025.100908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Distributed renewable energy systems are emerging in communities and buildings in response to global warming. Concurrently, the frequency of large-scale power outages, which are often triggered by natural disasters and heavy rainfall, has increased. This trend highlights the necessity to develop robust energy systems that integrate distributed renewable energy with other sources. Economic and resilience assessments of photovoltaic (PV) and battery systems within infrastructure contexts have been extensively studied. However, resilience evaluation at the building level is necessary. Given that energy resilience encompasses various assessment aspects, the importance of employing multiple indicators for a comprehensive quantitative evaluation of resilience in PV and battery installations is increasing. This study introduced a methodology to quantitatively assess the resilience of energy systems. It employs multiple resilience indicators and simulates a power outage scenario in a positive energy building (PEB) equipped with PV and batteries. Additionally, this study analyzed the impact of different weather conditions on resilience. An assessment using multiple resilience indicators reveals that energy systems are more resilient on favorable weather days and that resilience is maximized when supply interruptions coincide with daylight hours. Furthermore, while no single indicator can measure resilience, this study shows that the use of multiple indicators enables the clarification and comparison of electricity supply and demand conditions during a disaster.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100488,"journal":{"name":"e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100908"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772671125000154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distributed renewable energy systems are emerging in communities and buildings in response to global warming. Concurrently, the frequency of large-scale power outages, which are often triggered by natural disasters and heavy rainfall, has increased. This trend highlights the necessity to develop robust energy systems that integrate distributed renewable energy with other sources. Economic and resilience assessments of photovoltaic (PV) and battery systems within infrastructure contexts have been extensively studied. However, resilience evaluation at the building level is necessary. Given that energy resilience encompasses various assessment aspects, the importance of employing multiple indicators for a comprehensive quantitative evaluation of resilience in PV and battery installations is increasing. This study introduced a methodology to quantitatively assess the resilience of energy systems. It employs multiple resilience indicators and simulates a power outage scenario in a positive energy building (PEB) equipped with PV and batteries. Additionally, this study analyzed the impact of different weather conditions on resilience. An assessment using multiple resilience indicators reveals that energy systems are more resilient on favorable weather days and that resilience is maximized when supply interruptions coincide with daylight hours. Furthermore, while no single indicator can measure resilience, this study shows that the use of multiple indicators enables the clarification and comparison of electricity supply and demand conditions during a disaster.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exponential function LMS and fractional order pid based voltage power quality enhancement in distribution network A new discrete GaN-based dv/dt control circuit for megahertz frequency power converters Anomaly detection of adversarial cyber attacks on electric vehicle charging stations Assessment methodology for the resilience of energy systems in positive energy buildings Transactive energy management for efficient scheduling and storage utilization in a grid-connected renewable energy-based microgrid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1