A review on Linear Fresnel Reflector (LFR) as a solar line concentrator in polygeneration for low-medium temperature applications among the rural livelihoods

IF 9.5 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy nexus Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.nexus.2024.100340
Sanju John Thomas , Sudhansu S. Sahoo , Sheffy Thomas , Ajith Kumar G , Mohamed M. Awad
{"title":"A review on Linear Fresnel Reflector (LFR) as a solar line concentrator in polygeneration for low-medium temperature applications among the rural livelihoods","authors":"Sanju John Thomas ,&nbsp;Sudhansu S. Sahoo ,&nbsp;Sheffy Thomas ,&nbsp;Ajith Kumar G ,&nbsp;Mohamed M. Awad","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2024.100340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rural electrification is exhaustive, costly, and lacks paybacks while renewable energy interventions are policy-influenced usually taking a top-down approach. The livelihood activities are energy intensive, while specific in nature and requirement. There exists an inherent nexus among rural livelihoods between energy-water-food, which is often not explored., while polygeneration and cogeneration methods can benefit this nexus. Parabolic trough collectors (PTC), heliostats, and Linear Fresnel Reflectors (LFR) are solar concentrators used for high-temperature steam generation. The LFR has the advantage of easy installation, reduced structures, good optical efficiency, flexible designs, and direct steam generation at a temperature range of 80 C - to 400 C, which can be a techno-commercial competitor for evacuated tube collectors (ETC) and PTC. An extensive review of the energy requirement in various rural livelihoods and the potential of solar concentrators with a focus on the PTC and LFR, with their limitation and the advantages are done. While the LFR can match the optical efficiency of the PTC, it is found that the two-phase flow and the entropy generation are the limitations, while easy installations, custom designs, and reduced structures are the advantages over the PTC. The review and comparison have found that there is a difference between the thermal energy produced per mirror area and the land area with respect to PTC and the LFR. Concerning application in the diary industry, it is found that with the modifications in LFR, the thermal energy produced per square meter of land by LFR can be 300 MW<sub>h</sub>/m<sup>2,</sup> while the PTC produces 225 MW<sub>h</sub> / m<sup>2</sup> in comparison with 180 MW<sub>h</sub> /m<sup>2</sup>. This shows that LFR modifications including reduced receiver height, inclined mirror, and double reflectors can make it the ideal solar collector for rural livelihood applications for low-medium heat requirements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100340"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427124000718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rural electrification is exhaustive, costly, and lacks paybacks while renewable energy interventions are policy-influenced usually taking a top-down approach. The livelihood activities are energy intensive, while specific in nature and requirement. There exists an inherent nexus among rural livelihoods between energy-water-food, which is often not explored., while polygeneration and cogeneration methods can benefit this nexus. Parabolic trough collectors (PTC), heliostats, and Linear Fresnel Reflectors (LFR) are solar concentrators used for high-temperature steam generation. The LFR has the advantage of easy installation, reduced structures, good optical efficiency, flexible designs, and direct steam generation at a temperature range of 80 C - to 400 C, which can be a techno-commercial competitor for evacuated tube collectors (ETC) and PTC. An extensive review of the energy requirement in various rural livelihoods and the potential of solar concentrators with a focus on the PTC and LFR, with their limitation and the advantages are done. While the LFR can match the optical efficiency of the PTC, it is found that the two-phase flow and the entropy generation are the limitations, while easy installations, custom designs, and reduced structures are the advantages over the PTC. The review and comparison have found that there is a difference between the thermal energy produced per mirror area and the land area with respect to PTC and the LFR. Concerning application in the diary industry, it is found that with the modifications in LFR, the thermal energy produced per square meter of land by LFR can be 300 MWh/m2, while the PTC produces 225 MWh / m2 in comparison with 180 MWh /m2. This shows that LFR modifications including reduced receiver height, inclined mirror, and double reflectors can make it the ideal solar collector for rural livelihood applications for low-medium heat requirements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
线性菲涅耳反射器(LFR)作为多联产中低温太阳能线聚光器在农村生计中的应用综述
农村电气化耗时耗力、成本高且缺乏回报,而可再生能源干预受政策影响,通常采取自上而下的方式。生计活动是能源密集型的,但在性质和要求上都是特定的。在农村生计中,能源-水-食物之间存在着一种内在的联系,而这种联系往往没有得到探讨。而多联产和热电联产方法可以使这种联系受益。抛物面槽收集器(PTC)、定日镜和线性菲涅耳反射器(LFR)是用于高温蒸汽产生的太阳能聚光器。LFR具有安装方便,结构紧凑,光学效率好,设计灵活,在80℃至400℃的温度范围内直接产生蒸汽的优点,可以成为真空管集热器(ETC)和PTC的技术商业竞争对手。广泛审查了各种农村生计的能源需求和太阳能集中器的潜力,重点是PTC和LFR,以及它们的局限性和优点。虽然LFR可以匹配PTC的光学效率,但发现两相流和熵产生是限制因素,而易于安装,定制设计和结构简化是PTC的优势。审查和比较发现,就PTC和LFR而言,每个镜面面积和陆地面积产生的热能之间存在差异。在乳制品行业的应用中,通过对LFR的修改,LFR每平方米土地产生的热能可以达到300 MWh/m2,而PTC每平方米土地产生的热能可以达到225 MWh/m2,而PTC每平方米土地产生的热能为180 MWh/m2。这表明LFR的改进,包括降低接收器高度,倾斜镜面和双反射镜,可以使其成为农村生计应用中低热量需求的理想太阳能集热器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
期刊最新文献
A development of a new measure for renewable energy uncertainty in Vietnam by using natural language processing and textual analysis Integrated evaluation of energy and water use in air-cooled and adiabatic condensers – a case study in an office building Significant boost in energy efficiency of high-tech greenhouse capsicum amid projected climate scenarios Survey and analysis of consumer behavior for food waste management in Bangladesh Process evaluation of supercritical water liquefaction of mixed polyolefin wastes for integrated waste and energy systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1