Propuesta de un listado de verificación quirúrgica complementario para la cirugía de columna vertebral

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Neurocirugia Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neucir.2024.07.002
Antonio José Vargas López , Gador Ramos Bosquet , Carlos Fernández Carballal
{"title":"Propuesta de un listado de verificación quirúrgica complementario para la cirugía de columna vertebral","authors":"Antonio José Vargas López ,&nbsp;Gador Ramos Bosquet ,&nbsp;Carlos Fernández Carballal","doi":"10.1016/j.neucir.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Once the World Health Organization (WHO) generic surgical checklist has been standardized and following the itinerary proposed, it is up to the different specialties to continue advancing in the improvement and adjustment of the checklists to their specific procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Through a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), in which professionals from the surgical area of the Torrecárdenas University Hospital, Jaén Hospital Complex and Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital participated, aspects that threaten patient safety in spine surgery and that are not included in the WHO generic surgical checklist were proposed. The authors scored each of the proposed items incrementally based on the degree of suitability. Based on the score obtained, they selected those which would be incorporated into the specific safety checklist.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 21 candidate items were proposed to be part of the specific check list. These obtained scores between 15 and 11 points. After scoring them, it was decided to include the 13 best rated in the definitive surgical checklist, 7 of them in the initial phase, 2 in the phase prior to the incision and another 4 in the final part of the checklist prior to the completion of the procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Professionals in the surgical area of Neurosurgery can identify aspects not included in the generic checklist whose non-compliance can affect patient safety in spine surgery to at least the same extent as those included in WHO checklist.</div><div>It is possible to propose a specific complementary checklist for spinal surgery, responsible for collecting aspects related to safety and success in these procedures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51145,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia","volume":"36 1","pages":"Pages 1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130147324000782","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Once the World Health Organization (WHO) generic surgical checklist has been standardized and following the itinerary proposed, it is up to the different specialties to continue advancing in the improvement and adjustment of the checklists to their specific procedures.

Methods

Through a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), in which professionals from the surgical area of the Torrecárdenas University Hospital, Jaén Hospital Complex and Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital participated, aspects that threaten patient safety in spine surgery and that are not included in the WHO generic surgical checklist were proposed. The authors scored each of the proposed items incrementally based on the degree of suitability. Based on the score obtained, they selected those which would be incorporated into the specific safety checklist.

Results

A total of 21 candidate items were proposed to be part of the specific check list. These obtained scores between 15 and 11 points. After scoring them, it was decided to include the 13 best rated in the definitive surgical checklist, 7 of them in the initial phase, 2 in the phase prior to the incision and another 4 in the final part of the checklist prior to the completion of the procedure.

Conclusions

Professionals in the surgical area of Neurosurgery can identify aspects not included in the generic checklist whose non-compliance can affect patient safety in spine surgery to at least the same extent as those included in WHO checklist.
It is possible to propose a specific complementary checklist for spinal surgery, responsible for collecting aspects related to safety and success in these procedures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocirugia
Neurocirugia 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Neurocirugía is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (SENEC). It is published every 2 months (6 issues per year). Neurocirugía will consider for publication, original clinical and experimental scientific works associated with neurosurgery and other related neurological sciences. All manuscripts are submitted for review by experts in the field (peer review) and are carried out anonymously (double blind). The Journal accepts works written in Spanish or English.
期刊最新文献
Endovascular treatment of chronic subdural hematoma in a dual-trained neurosurgical unit: Results and proposal of a randomized controlled trial protocol Neuronavegación electromagnética en neuroendoscopia. Protocolo de navegación para el ventriculoscopio LOTTA. Nota técnica Relationship between optic nerve length and interoptic angle in the prediction of optic chiasm location Revisión de los fracasos terapéuticos de la descompresión microvascular en la neuralgia del trigémino en un hospital terciario Propuesta de un listado de verificación quirúrgica complementario para la cirugía de columna vertebral
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1