Bertram Richter, F. Niklas Schietzold, Wolfgang Graf, Michael Kaliske
{"title":"Intermediately discretized extended α-level-optimization – An advanced fuzzy analysis approach","authors":"Bertram Richter, F. Niklas Schietzold, Wolfgang Graf, Michael Kaliske","doi":"10.1016/j.advengsoft.2025.103865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Appropriate uncertainty models are required for realistic representations of quantities in real world engineering tasks. Uncertainty quantification is applied to estimate the uncertainty of system responses, with respect to uncertain input quantities. In contrast to aleatoric uncertainty, which is based on natural variability, epistemic uncertainty is caused by lack of knowledge, incertitudes or inaccuracy. In this contribution, epistemic uncertainties are modeled by fuzzy quantities and corresponding uncertainty quantification approaches are investigated. The propagation of fuzzy quantities is based on the extension principle. For numerical analyses, a discretization of the extension principle is required, which can be reformulated as an optimization problem. Two different approaches are state-of-the-art for formulating the optimization problem of the extension principle, which are referred to as <span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>-level optimization and sampling-based approach (SBA). A comparison of these two approaches is presented, highlighting their advantages and deficits with respect to efficiency and accuracy of the fuzzy analyses. Based on the advantages of both <span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>-level optimization and SBA, a novel approach, the intermediately discretized extended <span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>-level optimization (IDEALO), is developed. In IDEALO, advantages of <span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>-level optimization and SBA are combined to a hybrid approach. The superiority of IDEALO over the other two approaches is demonstrated in benchmark examples.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50866,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Engineering Software","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 103865"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Engineering Software","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965997825000031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Appropriate uncertainty models are required for realistic representations of quantities in real world engineering tasks. Uncertainty quantification is applied to estimate the uncertainty of system responses, with respect to uncertain input quantities. In contrast to aleatoric uncertainty, which is based on natural variability, epistemic uncertainty is caused by lack of knowledge, incertitudes or inaccuracy. In this contribution, epistemic uncertainties are modeled by fuzzy quantities and corresponding uncertainty quantification approaches are investigated. The propagation of fuzzy quantities is based on the extension principle. For numerical analyses, a discretization of the extension principle is required, which can be reformulated as an optimization problem. Two different approaches are state-of-the-art for formulating the optimization problem of the extension principle, which are referred to as -level optimization and sampling-based approach (SBA). A comparison of these two approaches is presented, highlighting their advantages and deficits with respect to efficiency and accuracy of the fuzzy analyses. Based on the advantages of both -level optimization and SBA, a novel approach, the intermediately discretized extended -level optimization (IDEALO), is developed. In IDEALO, advantages of -level optimization and SBA are combined to a hybrid approach. The superiority of IDEALO over the other two approaches is demonstrated in benchmark examples.
期刊介绍:
The objective of this journal is to communicate recent and projected advances in computer-based engineering techniques. The fields covered include mechanical, aerospace, civil and environmental engineering, with an emphasis on research and development leading to practical problem-solving.
The scope of the journal includes:
• Innovative computational strategies and numerical algorithms for large-scale engineering problems
• Analysis and simulation techniques and systems
• Model and mesh generation
• Control of the accuracy, stability and efficiency of computational process
• Exploitation of new computing environments (eg distributed hetergeneous and collaborative computing)
• Advanced visualization techniques, virtual environments and prototyping
• Applications of AI, knowledge-based systems, computational intelligence, including fuzzy logic, neural networks and evolutionary computations
• Application of object-oriented technology to engineering problems
• Intelligent human computer interfaces
• Design automation, multidisciplinary design and optimization
• CAD, CAE and integrated process and product development systems
• Quality and reliability.