Group dynamic game under bounded rationality in agreed transfer of China’s carbon trading secondary market

IF 6.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Industrial Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2025.110857
Zhen Peng, Zitao Hong
{"title":"Group dynamic game under bounded rationality in agreed transfer of China’s carbon trading secondary market","authors":"Zhen Peng,&nbsp;Zitao Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2025.110857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon emission allowance trading in the secondary market determines both the efficiency of carbon resource allocation and the effectiveness of carbon trading system. To reveal the mechanism of agreed transfer in China’s carbon emission allowance trading, this paper proposes a model of group dynamic game under bounded rationality, which integrates elements of both dynamic game and evolutionary game. It adopts the inverse induction method, using a nested payoff matrix, to recursively solve the game layer-by-layer from the inside out. Theoretical and experimental studies have shown that (1) The stable result is independent of the initial strategy of bounded rationality and depends on the comparative combinations of the profits of both parties in different stages; (2) When the agreed transfer concludes in the first stage, the total benefits of both parties are the largest, and the transaction efficiency is the highest; (3) The seller group achieves maximum gains when the initial bid is not excessively high, the buyer group’s discount factor is low, and the buyer group’s marginal return is substantial; (4) The buyer group can maximize its gains in first stage or second stage. Considering carbon market efficiency, it is advisable for the buyer group to choose the first stage when marginal return is high.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 110857"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835225000026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon emission allowance trading in the secondary market determines both the efficiency of carbon resource allocation and the effectiveness of carbon trading system. To reveal the mechanism of agreed transfer in China’s carbon emission allowance trading, this paper proposes a model of group dynamic game under bounded rationality, which integrates elements of both dynamic game and evolutionary game. It adopts the inverse induction method, using a nested payoff matrix, to recursively solve the game layer-by-layer from the inside out. Theoretical and experimental studies have shown that (1) The stable result is independent of the initial strategy of bounded rationality and depends on the comparative combinations of the profits of both parties in different stages; (2) When the agreed transfer concludes in the first stage, the total benefits of both parties are the largest, and the transaction efficiency is the highest; (3) The seller group achieves maximum gains when the initial bid is not excessively high, the buyer group’s discount factor is low, and the buyer group’s marginal return is substantial; (4) The buyer group can maximize its gains in first stage or second stage. Considering carbon market efficiency, it is advisable for the buyer group to choose the first stage when marginal return is high.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有限理性下中国碳交易二级市场协议转让中的群体动态博弈
二级市场的碳排放权交易既决定了碳资源配置的效率,也决定了碳交易体系的有效性。为了揭示中国碳排放权交易中的协议转移机制,本文提出了一个有限理性下的群体动态博弈模型,该模型将动态博弈与进化博弈相结合。它采用逆向归纳法,使用嵌套的收益矩阵,从内到外逐层递归求解博弈。理论和实验研究表明:(1)稳定结果与有限理性初始策略无关,取决于双方在不同阶段的利润比较组合;(2)协议转让在第一阶段完成时,双方的总收益最大,交易效率最高;(3)当初始出价不过高、买方群体的折扣系数较低、买方群体的边际收益较大时,卖方群体获得最大收益;(4)买方群体可以在第一阶段或第二阶段实现收益最大化。考虑到碳市场效率,买方群体宜选择边际收益较高的第一阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic scheduling of automated manufacturing systems under logical and temporal constrains using staged Q-learning with curriculum guidance A domain knowledge-enhanced MBSE framework for developing knowledge-based inspection systems: A case study on overhead crane inspection Coordinated planning of autonomous rail rapid transit trains with flexible coupling operations and demand-responsive high-speed rail shuttle buses with same-platform transfers Remaining useful life prediction of systems under time-varying conditions based on dynamic weighted information fusion and an adaptive UKF Research on emergency material warehouse location and inventory prepositioning planning for pre-disaster response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1