Environmental regulation, market power and low-carbon development of China's coal power industry chain —Based on both strategy and return perspectives

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Strategy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2025.101651
Jiaming Gao , Li Zhang
{"title":"Environmental regulation, market power and low-carbon development of China's coal power industry chain —Based on both strategy and return perspectives","authors":"Jiaming Gao ,&nbsp;Li Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2025.101651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To study the behavioral strategies of government agencies and the coal power industry chain under environmental regulation, an evolutionary game model has been constructed. Furthermore, a reinforcement learning model has been developed using the payoff matrix. By analyzing the characteristics of different environmental regulatory policies and the future development trends of China's coal power industry chain, we evaluate the impact of various regulatory policies on the game players from both strategy and return perspectives. The results show that (1) Power companies are policy sensitive; (2) In the context of both market-based and voluntary environmental regulation policies, there exists a potential to trigger the \" coal-power paradox \". (3) Market-based environmental regulation is most effective, whereas command-based environmental regulation offers prompt policy feedback, and voluntary environmental regulation merely serve as a supplementary regulatory tool.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101651"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25000148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To study the behavioral strategies of government agencies and the coal power industry chain under environmental regulation, an evolutionary game model has been constructed. Furthermore, a reinforcement learning model has been developed using the payoff matrix. By analyzing the characteristics of different environmental regulatory policies and the future development trends of China's coal power industry chain, we evaluate the impact of various regulatory policies on the game players from both strategy and return perspectives. The results show that (1) Power companies are policy sensitive; (2) In the context of both market-based and voluntary environmental regulation policies, there exists a potential to trigger the " coal-power paradox ". (3) Market-based environmental regulation is most effective, whereas command-based environmental regulation offers prompt policy feedback, and voluntary environmental regulation merely serve as a supplementary regulatory tool.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国煤电产业链的环境规制、市场力量与低碳发展 -基于战略与回报的双重视角
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
期刊最新文献
Tracing the trajectories of energy intensity, environmental tax revenues, and environmental neutrality in major European economies Cybersecurity in microgrids: A review on advanced techniques and practical implementation of resilient energy systems Can transparency governance promote interregional coordinated carbon emission reduction? A new perspective from China provincial transparency index Is Russian gas still needed in the European Union? Model-based analysis of long-term scenarios Environmental regulation, market power and low-carbon development of China's coal power industry chain —Based on both strategy and return perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1