Teaching for near transfer: Is maths instruction aimed at schema formation and abstraction associated with pupils' ability to answer unfamiliar maths questions?

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102609
John Jerrim , Luis Alejandro Lopez-Agudo , Sam Sims , Oscar David Marcenaro-Gutierrez
{"title":"Teaching for near transfer: Is maths instruction aimed at schema formation and abstraction associated with pupils' ability to answer unfamiliar maths questions?","authors":"John Jerrim ,&nbsp;Luis Alejandro Lopez-Agudo ,&nbsp;Sam Sims ,&nbsp;Oscar David Marcenaro-Gutierrez","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There has long been interest in education on the issue of “transfer” – the extent to which students can apply what they have been taught in school to solve related but novel problems or tasks. More recently, attention in this literature has turned to understanding whether certain teaching approaches are more likely to lead to transfer, such as integrating new learning with existing knowledge and comparing multiple cases with the same underlying structure. Using data on 280,000 students in the 2019 TIMMS study, we investigate whether maths teaching that uses this approach is associated with primary students being able to solve mathematics problems that are not included on their country's national curriculum. We find no evidence that it does, which underlines the challenges involved in teaching for near, let alone far, transfer of academic skills.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 102609"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024002024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has long been interest in education on the issue of “transfer” – the extent to which students can apply what they have been taught in school to solve related but novel problems or tasks. More recently, attention in this literature has turned to understanding whether certain teaching approaches are more likely to lead to transfer, such as integrating new learning with existing knowledge and comparing multiple cases with the same underlying structure. Using data on 280,000 students in the 2019 TIMMS study, we investigate whether maths teaching that uses this approach is associated with primary students being able to solve mathematics problems that are not included on their country's national curriculum. We find no evidence that it does, which underlines the challenges involved in teaching for near, let alone far, transfer of academic skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近迁移教学:以图式形成和抽象为目标的数学教学是否与学生回答不熟悉的数学问题的能力有关?
长期以来,人们一直对教育中的“迁移”问题感兴趣,即学生能在多大程度上运用他们在学校学到的知识来解决相关但新颖的问题或任务。最近,这些文献的注意力转向了理解某些教学方法是否更容易导致迁移,例如将新学习与现有知识相结合,以及比较具有相同底层结构的多个案例。利用2019年TIMMS研究中28万名学生的数据,我们调查了采用这种方法的数学教学是否与小学生能够解决本国国家课程中未包括的数学问题有关。我们没有发现任何证据表明这一点,这突显了为近距离(更不用说远距离)学术技能转移进行教学所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
期刊最新文献
Rock-Paper-Screen: Fifth-graders' comprehension of simple and enhanced digital text Profiling bilinguals: The concurrent and longitudinal associations between executive function and reading proficiency From concrete to abstract: How stimulus concreteness impacts numerical conflict resolution in children Seeing eye to eye on student motivation: Moderators of student–teacher agreement Instructional contexts and time in first-grade math achievement: Moderating roles of math and externalizing behavioral risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1