Comparison of methods used to determine protease activities of insect (Eurygaster integriceps) damaged wheat and flour

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Cereal Science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jcs.2024.104089
Halef Dizlek , Mehmet Sertaç Özer
{"title":"Comparison of methods used to determine protease activities of insect (Eurygaster integriceps) damaged wheat and flour","authors":"Halef Dizlek ,&nbsp;Mehmet Sertaç Özer","doi":"10.1016/j.jcs.2024.104089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Different methods have been used by different researchers to determine the protease activity (PA) of insect-damaged wheat. The aim of this research work was to determine the level of PA of wheat varieties with different sunn pest-damaged kernel ratio using four different literatures and to study the compatibility among them. The objective was to determine which method is more suitable for reliable measurement of PA in insect-damaged wheat and its flour. The method proposed by Yakovenko et al. (1973) and Sivri's method (1998) were not accepted because the amount of water-soluble protein in sound samples increases with time. AACC Method 22–62.01 (AACC International, 2010) was also not suitable for the determination of sunn pest PA. It was concluded that Every's method (1991a, 1991b) showed the difference between the PA of the samples more clearly than the other methods, but that this method is relatively low accuracy because it determines PA based only on gel height without the use of instrumental equipment. In this context, the modified SDS-protein gel method of Sivri (1998), performed with a spectrophotometer, is a successful method for the determination of PA, but when the amount of water-soluble protein was not considered, more accurate data were obtained.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15285,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cereal Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 104089"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cereal Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0733521024002479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Different methods have been used by different researchers to determine the protease activity (PA) of insect-damaged wheat. The aim of this research work was to determine the level of PA of wheat varieties with different sunn pest-damaged kernel ratio using four different literatures and to study the compatibility among them. The objective was to determine which method is more suitable for reliable measurement of PA in insect-damaged wheat and its flour. The method proposed by Yakovenko et al. (1973) and Sivri's method (1998) were not accepted because the amount of water-soluble protein in sound samples increases with time. AACC Method 22–62.01 (AACC International, 2010) was also not suitable for the determination of sunn pest PA. It was concluded that Every's method (1991a, 1991b) showed the difference between the PA of the samples more clearly than the other methods, but that this method is relatively low accuracy because it determines PA based only on gel height without the use of instrumental equipment. In this context, the modified SDS-protein gel method of Sivri (1998), performed with a spectrophotometer, is a successful method for the determination of PA, but when the amount of water-soluble protein was not considered, more accurate data were obtained.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小麦和面粉受损昆虫蛋白酶活性测定方法的比较
不同的研究人员采用了不同的方法来测定虫害小麦的蛋白酶活性。利用4种不同的文献,测定不同日害比小麦品种的PA水平,并研究它们之间的亲和性。目的是确定哪种方法更适合于可靠地测量虫害小麦及其面粉中的PA。Yakovenko等人(1973)提出的方法和Sivri的方法(1998)没有被接受,因为声音样品中水溶性蛋白质的含量随着时间的推移而增加。AACC方法22-62.01 (AACC International, 2010)也不适用于太阳害虫PA的测定。由此得出Every的方法(1991a, 1991b)比其他方法更清楚地显示了样品之间PA的差异,但由于该方法仅根据凝胶高度确定PA,而不使用仪器设备,因此准确性相对较低。在此背景下,Sivri(1998)采用分光光度计进行的改良sds -蛋白凝胶法是一种测定PA的成功方法,但当不考虑水溶性蛋白的量时,得到的数据更为准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cereal Science
Journal of Cereal Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cereal Science was established in 1983 to provide an International forum for the publication of original research papers of high standing covering all aspects of cereal science related to the functional and nutritional quality of cereal grains (true cereals - members of the Poaceae family and starchy pseudocereals - members of the Amaranthaceae, Chenopodiaceae and Polygonaceae families) and their products, in relation to the cereals used. The journal also publishes concise and critical review articles appraising the status and future directions of specific areas of cereal science and short communications that present news of important advances in research. The journal aims at topicality and at providing comprehensive coverage of progress in the field.
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive assessment of low-rancid, high-performing pearl millet genotypes in a global germplasm collection using multi-trait stability indices Extrusion-assisted enzymatic modification slows the digestibility of rice starch by modulating its fine structure Effects of psyllium husk gel on the structure and functionality of quinoa-enriched whole wheat dough and steamed bread Effect of qualitative starch gelatinization on functional, cooking, and physicochemical properties of parboiled rice Foliar application of Fe2+ at heading stage modulates 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline accumulation, antioxidant capacity, and yield formation in fragrant rice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1