Unpacking experimentation in design thinking: Contributions to innovation performance and the moderating role of digital technologies

IF 10.9 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Technovation Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103187
Stefano Magistretti , Claudio Dell’Era , Marina Candi , Scott K. Swan , Mattia Bianchi , Giulia Calabretta , Ileana Stigliani , Roberto Verganti
{"title":"Unpacking experimentation in design thinking: Contributions to innovation performance and the moderating role of digital technologies","authors":"Stefano Magistretti ,&nbsp;Claudio Dell’Era ,&nbsp;Marina Candi ,&nbsp;Scott K. Swan ,&nbsp;Mattia Bianchi ,&nbsp;Giulia Calabretta ,&nbsp;Ileana Stigliani ,&nbsp;Roberto Verganti","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Design thinking is an innovation approach that emphasizes developing and testing hypotheses about the desirability, feasibility, and viability of an idea through iterative experimentation. Although widely used, there is limited empirical evidence to support the effectiveness of experimentation practices in design thinking projects. Similarly, the impact of integrating digital technologies into experimentation processes remains underexplored. This study addresses these gaps by analyzing data from 246 design thinking projects to examine how early and frequent experimentation influences innovation performance, specifically in terms of effectiveness and efficiency. It also examines how the use of digital technologies moderates these relationships. The results show that both early and frequent experimentation positively influence innovation effectiveness, while only early experimentation significantly improves innovation efficiency. Moreover, the use of digital technologies strengthens the positive effects of early experimentation on both effectiveness and efficiency. This research provides valuable theoretical and practical insights by deepening our understanding of how experimentation and digital tools drive innovation performance in design thinking projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 103187"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225000197","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design thinking is an innovation approach that emphasizes developing and testing hypotheses about the desirability, feasibility, and viability of an idea through iterative experimentation. Although widely used, there is limited empirical evidence to support the effectiveness of experimentation practices in design thinking projects. Similarly, the impact of integrating digital technologies into experimentation processes remains underexplored. This study addresses these gaps by analyzing data from 246 design thinking projects to examine how early and frequent experimentation influences innovation performance, specifically in terms of effectiveness and efficiency. It also examines how the use of digital technologies moderates these relationships. The results show that both early and frequent experimentation positively influence innovation effectiveness, while only early experimentation significantly improves innovation efficiency. Moreover, the use of digital technologies strengthens the positive effects of early experimentation on both effectiveness and efficiency. This research provides valuable theoretical and practical insights by deepening our understanding of how experimentation and digital tools drive innovation performance in design thinking projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计思维中的拆包实验:对创新绩效的贡献和数字技术的调节作用
设计思维是一种创新方法,强调通过反复实验来开发和测试关于想法的可取性、可行性和可行性的假设。虽然被广泛使用,但有限的经验证据支持实验实践在设计思维项目中的有效性。同样,将数字技术整合到实验过程中的影响仍未得到充分探索。本研究通过分析246个设计思维项目的数据来解决这些差距,以检验早期和频繁的实验如何影响创新绩效,特别是在有效性和效率方面。它还研究了数字技术的使用如何调节这些关系。结果表明,早期实验和频繁实验对创新效率均有正向影响,而只有早期实验才能显著提高创新效率。此外,数字技术的使用加强了早期实验对有效性和效率的积极影响。这项研究通过加深我们对实验和数字工具如何推动设计思维项目创新绩效的理解,提供了有价值的理论和实践见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence in trauma and emergency surgery: A quantitative study of perceived technology acceptance The role of AI for sustainability and economic performance: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry Data-driven high-tech entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence from China AI investment decision in digital home-based elderly care service: A mean field game analysis Knowledge spillovers from local innovative industrial clusters: A business group network perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1