Health promoting universities: A scoping review

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Promotion Journal of Australia Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1002/hpja.939
Comellas Sáenz, Esqué Boldú, Juvinyà Canal
{"title":"Health promoting universities: A scoping review","authors":"Comellas Sáenz,&nbsp;Esqué Boldú,&nbsp;Juvinyà Canal","doi":"10.1002/hpja.939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Issue Addressed</h3>\n \n <p>The university setting represents a singular context to promote health and well-being. Although health-promoting university (HPU) initiatives exist worldwide, information on theoretical principles is sparse. The purpose of this integrative review is to describe how the HPU approach has been theorised.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A scoping review was carried out in PubMed, Medline, ERIC, Scielo, WoS, Scopus and CINAHL following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) statement. The articles included in the final step were content analysed according to: (a) reference; (b) country; (c) label; (d) objectives of work; (e) HPU definition and (f) type of study. For the empirical articles, some additional items were reviewed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After the analysis and exclusion of studies for not meeting the inclusion criteria, 22 articles were integrated into the final sample. Of those, 12 were theoretical papers and 10 were empirical studies. The review found that most of the studies define the HPU approach according to the principles described in the Ottawa Charter and the socioecological perspective on health promotion. Most of the empirical selected studies are based on qualitative data. The implementation of healthy policies and evaluative strategies are remaining challenges.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest that the HPU concept is underpinned by a wide array of theories and models. It also points to the need for a common university framework that integrates the basic principles into practice. The articulation between theoretical narrative and practical initiatives is a remaining threat that needs to be assessed in order to enable universities to become healthy spaces.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> So What?</h3>\n \n <p>HPU generates enabling conditions that support communities to improve and maintain their health status and well-being. In this sense, more evidence of effectiveness will be needed in future research.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"36 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issue Addressed

The university setting represents a singular context to promote health and well-being. Although health-promoting university (HPU) initiatives exist worldwide, information on theoretical principles is sparse. The purpose of this integrative review is to describe how the HPU approach has been theorised.

Methods

A scoping review was carried out in PubMed, Medline, ERIC, Scielo, WoS, Scopus and CINAHL following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) statement. The articles included in the final step were content analysed according to: (a) reference; (b) country; (c) label; (d) objectives of work; (e) HPU definition and (f) type of study. For the empirical articles, some additional items were reviewed.

Results

After the analysis and exclusion of studies for not meeting the inclusion criteria, 22 articles were integrated into the final sample. Of those, 12 were theoretical papers and 10 were empirical studies. The review found that most of the studies define the HPU approach according to the principles described in the Ottawa Charter and the socioecological perspective on health promotion. Most of the empirical selected studies are based on qualitative data. The implementation of healthy policies and evaluative strategies are remaining challenges.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the HPU concept is underpinned by a wide array of theories and models. It also points to the need for a common university framework that integrates the basic principles into practice. The articulation between theoretical narrative and practical initiatives is a remaining threat that needs to be assessed in order to enable universities to become healthy spaces.

So What?

HPU generates enabling conditions that support communities to improve and maintain their health status and well-being. In this sense, more evidence of effectiveness will be needed in future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决的问题 大学环境是促进健康和幸福的独特环境。虽然全世界都有促进大学健康(HPU)的倡议,但有关理论原则的信息却很少。本综述旨在描述如何将促进健康大学的方法理论化。 方法 按照 "系统性综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目扩展"(PRISMA-ScR)声明,在 PubMed、Medline、ERIC、Scielo、WoS、Scopus 和 CINAHL 中进行了范围界定综述。对纳入最后步骤的文章进行了内容分析,分析依据包括(a) 参考文献;(b) 国家;(c) 标签;(d) 工作目标;(e) HPU 定义和 (f) 研究类型。对于经验性文章,还审查了其他一些项目。 结果 经过分析和排除不符合纳入标准的研究后,22 篇文章被纳入最终样本。其中,12 篇为理论文章,10 篇为实证研究。综述发现,大多数研究都是根据《渥太华宪章》中描述的原则和健康促进的社会生态观点来定义 HPU 方法的。大多数选定的实证研究都基于定性数据。健康政策和评估战略的实施仍然是一项挑战。 结论 我们的研究结果表明,"健康促进股 "概念的基础是一系列广泛的理论和模式。这也表明,需要一个共同的大学框架,将基本原则融入实践。为了使大学成为一个健康的空间,需要对理论叙述与实际举措之间的衔接进行评估。 健康大学创造有利条件,支持社区改善和保持其健康状况和福祉。从这个意义上讲,未来的研究需要更多的有效性证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
期刊最新文献
Health promoting universities: A scoping review Protective Factors Against e-Cigarette Use Among First Nations People Aged 16–24 in the Next Generation Youth Wellbeing Study Measuring the Swimming Skills of Adults Attending Swimming Lessons in Australia as a Drowning Prevention Measure The Role of Aboriginal Kidney Health Mentors in the Transplant Journey: A Qualitative Evaluation “I Don't Really Understand It All!”: A Qualitative Study of Parental Perceptions of Australian Vaping Laws
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1