Effects of Peripheral Nerve Block on Perioperative Recovery Following Major Thoracic and Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity-score Matching.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006652
Zhen Zhang, Chen Li, Zhen-Zhen Xu, Jia-Hui Ma, Dong-Xin Wang
{"title":"Effects of Peripheral Nerve Block on Perioperative Recovery Following Major Thoracic and Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity-score Matching.","authors":"Zhen Zhang, Chen Li, Zhen-Zhen Xu, Jia-Hui Ma, Dong-Xin Wang","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the hypothesis that peripheral nerve block (PNB) use might be associated with improved perioperative outcomes following major surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary background data: </strong>PNB has been used to improve postoperative analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching. We included patients aged ≥65 years who underwent major (≥2 h) non-cardiac thoracic and abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Data were analyzed according to whether patients received PNB or not during anesthesia. Our primary outcome was the length of hospital stay; secondary outcomes included occurrence of major complications in hospital after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,915 patients were included in the full cohort, of whom 1,316 received PNB and 599 did not; 1,174 patients remained in the cohort after matching, with 587 in each group. Length of hospital stay after surgery was shorter in patients who received PNB than in those who did not (7 days [5 to 9] with PNB vs. 7 days [5 to 11] without PNB: HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.29, P=0.012). When compared with patients who did not receive PNB, those who received PNB developed fewer major complications during hospital stay (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.58, P<0.001). Patients with PNB required less supplemental analgesia within 72 h (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.84, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of PNB was associated with shortened length of hospital stay and reduced major complications in older patients after major non-cardiac thoracic and abdominal surgery, possibly due to improved analgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006652","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that peripheral nerve block (PNB) use might be associated with improved perioperative outcomes following major surgery.

Summary background data: PNB has been used to improve postoperative analgesia.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching. We included patients aged ≥65 years who underwent major (≥2 h) non-cardiac thoracic and abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Data were analyzed according to whether patients received PNB or not during anesthesia. Our primary outcome was the length of hospital stay; secondary outcomes included occurrence of major complications in hospital after surgery.

Results: A total of 1,915 patients were included in the full cohort, of whom 1,316 received PNB and 599 did not; 1,174 patients remained in the cohort after matching, with 587 in each group. Length of hospital stay after surgery was shorter in patients who received PNB than in those who did not (7 days [5 to 9] with PNB vs. 7 days [5 to 11] without PNB: HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.29, P=0.012). When compared with patients who did not receive PNB, those who received PNB developed fewer major complications during hospital stay (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.58, P<0.001). Patients with PNB required less supplemental analgesia within 72 h (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.84, P<0.001).

Conclusions: Use of PNB was associated with shortened length of hospital stay and reduced major complications in older patients after major non-cardiac thoracic and abdominal surgery, possibly due to improved analgesia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
期刊最新文献
ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator Accuracy When Operative Risk is Represented by the Principal CPT® code Versus Many Codes. Mitochondrial Transplantation: A Novel Therapy for Liver Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Effects of Peripheral Nerve Block on Perioperative Recovery Following Major Thoracic and Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity-score Matching. Multimodality Therapy Including Pleurectomy/Decortication in Pleural Mesothelioma: Long-Term Outcomes in 152 Consecutive Patients A Retrospective Cohort Study. Reconsidering Abdominal Drainage After Left Pancreatectomy - The Randomized Controlled PANDRA II Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1