Self-reported carbohydrate supercompensation and supplementation strategies adopted by Olympic triathlon athletes.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research Pub Date : 2025-02-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1414-431X2024e14189
M P Mendes, A H Marinho, F A Moura, G S Bádue, G A Ferreira, G G de Araujo, A E Lima-Silva, T Ataide-Silva
{"title":"Self-reported carbohydrate supercompensation and supplementation strategies adopted by Olympic triathlon athletes.","authors":"M P Mendes, A H Marinho, F A Moura, G S Bádue, G A Ferreira, G G de Araujo, A E Lima-Silva, T Ataide-Silva","doi":"10.1590/1414-431X2024e14189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the present study was to describe the use of tapering, carbohydrate (CHO) supercompensation, and supplementation strategies self-reported by athletes in the Olympic triathlon category. A total of 72 triathletes (61 males and 11 females) answered an online questionnaire about their training and performance, supercompensation strategies, carbohydrate supplementation, and use of supplements and other ergogenic substances. The information was summarized and subjected to descriptive analysis. Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to check data normality. The t-test was used to investigate differences in the analyzed variables between sexes. Almost all triathletes reported to have performed tapering (93.05%) and approximately half of them adopted a CHO supercompensation strategy (48.61%); updated CHO supercompensation was the most used strategy (27.77%). Most participants (86.11%) used CHO supplementation during competitions, but in amounts below the 60 g/h recommended for most athletes (96.77%). Thus, since few triathletes performed supercompensation, in addition to the insufficient amount of supplemented carbohydrate taken by them, it could be concluded that triathletes were not sufficiently aware of nutritional recommendations or did not adopt them.</p>","PeriodicalId":9088,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research","volume":"58 ","pages":"e14189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11793150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X2024e14189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to describe the use of tapering, carbohydrate (CHO) supercompensation, and supplementation strategies self-reported by athletes in the Olympic triathlon category. A total of 72 triathletes (61 males and 11 females) answered an online questionnaire about their training and performance, supercompensation strategies, carbohydrate supplementation, and use of supplements and other ergogenic substances. The information was summarized and subjected to descriptive analysis. Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to check data normality. The t-test was used to investigate differences in the analyzed variables between sexes. Almost all triathletes reported to have performed tapering (93.05%) and approximately half of them adopted a CHO supercompensation strategy (48.61%); updated CHO supercompensation was the most used strategy (27.77%). Most participants (86.11%) used CHO supplementation during competitions, but in amounts below the 60 g/h recommended for most athletes (96.77%). Thus, since few triathletes performed supercompensation, in addition to the insufficient amount of supplemented carbohydrate taken by them, it could be concluded that triathletes were not sufficiently aware of nutritional recommendations or did not adopt them.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥运铁人三项运动员自我报告的碳水化合物超补偿和补充策略。
本研究的目的是描述奥运会铁人三项运动员自我报告的逐渐减少、碳水化合物(CHO)超补偿和补充策略的使用情况。共有72名铁人三项运动员(61名男性和11名女性)回答了一份关于他们的训练和表现、超补偿策略、碳水化合物补充、补充剂和其他人体所需物质使用情况的在线问卷。对这些资料进行了总结和描述性分析。采用Shapiro-Wilk检验检验数据的正态性。使用t检验来调查分析变量在性别之间的差异。据报道,几乎所有铁人三项运动员都进行了逐渐减少训练(93.05%),其中大约一半的人采用了CHO超补偿策略(48.61%);更新后的CHO超补偿是使用最多的策略(27.77%)。大多数参与者(86.11%)在比赛期间使用CHO补充剂,但其量低于大多数运动员推荐的60克/小时(96.77%)。因此,由于铁人三项运动员很少进行超补偿,加上他们补充的碳水化合物量不足,可以得出结论,铁人三项运动员没有充分意识到营养建议或没有采用这些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, founded by Michel Jamra, is edited and published monthly by the Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC), a federation of Brazilian scientific societies: - Sociedade Brasileira de Biofísica (SBBf) - Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacologia e Terapêutica Experimental (SBFTE) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fisiologia (SBFis) - Sociedade Brasileira de Imunologia (SBI) - Sociedade Brasileira de Investigação Clínica (SBIC) - Sociedade Brasileira de Neurociências e Comportamento (SBNeC).
期刊最新文献
Targeting IL-17/NF-κB/VAChT/Rho-kinase signaling and oxidative stress in exacerbated chronic allergic inflammation: functional and therapeutic implications of IL-17 blockade. MMP9 regulates osteogenesis and MMP2 expression through the TGF-β1/SMAD2/3 signaling pathway in lipopolysaccharide-induced osteoblasts. Surgical induction model of femoral defect in Wistar rats for bone repair histology. 1H-NMR-based metabolomics reveals that prior exercise modulates metabolic changes in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus in sleep-deprived mice. Biomarker-based prediction of radial artery occlusion after cardiac catheterization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1