Most oncological pancreas resections must consider the mesopancreas.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13599-x
S A Safi, S David, L Haeberle, S Vaghiri, T Luedde, C Roderburg, I Esposito, G Fluegen, W T Knoefel
{"title":"Most oncological pancreas resections must consider the mesopancreas.","authors":"S A Safi, S David, L Haeberle, S Vaghiri, T Luedde, C Roderburg, I Esposito, G Fluegen, W T Knoefel","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13599-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In preoperative staging for patients with a ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC), resectability is anatomically characterized by the possible clearance of the medial vascular grove. Borderline resectable PDAC patients who retain an increased risk of infiltration to the portomesenteric system and/or arterial vasculate are candidates for neoadjuvant therapy. However, redefined pathological analysis revealed the dorsal resection margin to be similar at risk for R1 resection. Mesopancreatic excision (MPE) aims to secure the integrity of the dorsal and ventral resection margins. The existence of the mesopancreas (MP) is inevitable, since the pancreas is of a secondary retroperitoneal nature and the dorsal as well as ventral fascial coverings define the peripancreatic compartment anatomy. It remains unknown if the MP area is only infiltrated in high-risk PDAC patients or if MPE during pancreatoduodenectomy should be employed for localized PDAC patients as well.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent upfront pancreatoduodenectomy were included. CRM evaluation and analysis of the MP was standardized in all patients. Patients were sub-grouped by the infiltration status of the vascular groove (localized disease: LOC). In LOC patients there was evidently no cancerous infiltration into the medial vascular groove (true + primary resectable).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred eighty-four consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy were included (169 LOC patients). In LOC patients the MP infiltration rate remained high but was significantly lower when compared to advanced PDAC patients (MP + 69.2% vs. 83.5%, p = 0.005). In LOC patients, CRM resection status of the dorsal resection status remained significantly affected by the MP infiltration status (R0CRM- 80.5% vs. 62.8%, p = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These important findings clearly show underestimated tumor extensions into the mesopancreas even in localized, primary resectable PDAC patients who are currently amenable for upfront resection. Synergistically to total mesorectal or mesocolic excision, which is applied to all stages of colorectal disease, MPE is justified in primary resectable patients as well. Therefore, MPE should be employed in all PDAC patients. Since the infiltration status of the mesopancreas was a significant factor for incomplete resection in primary resectable PDAC patients, neoadjuvant treatment options for must be discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11796116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13599-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In preoperative staging for patients with a ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC), resectability is anatomically characterized by the possible clearance of the medial vascular grove. Borderline resectable PDAC patients who retain an increased risk of infiltration to the portomesenteric system and/or arterial vasculate are candidates for neoadjuvant therapy. However, redefined pathological analysis revealed the dorsal resection margin to be similar at risk for R1 resection. Mesopancreatic excision (MPE) aims to secure the integrity of the dorsal and ventral resection margins. The existence of the mesopancreas (MP) is inevitable, since the pancreas is of a secondary retroperitoneal nature and the dorsal as well as ventral fascial coverings define the peripancreatic compartment anatomy. It remains unknown if the MP area is only infiltrated in high-risk PDAC patients or if MPE during pancreatoduodenectomy should be employed for localized PDAC patients as well.

Methods: Patients who underwent upfront pancreatoduodenectomy were included. CRM evaluation and analysis of the MP was standardized in all patients. Patients were sub-grouped by the infiltration status of the vascular groove (localized disease: LOC). In LOC patients there was evidently no cancerous infiltration into the medial vascular groove (true + primary resectable).

Results: Two hundred eighty-four consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy were included (169 LOC patients). In LOC patients the MP infiltration rate remained high but was significantly lower when compared to advanced PDAC patients (MP + 69.2% vs. 83.5%, p = 0.005). In LOC patients, CRM resection status of the dorsal resection status remained significantly affected by the MP infiltration status (R0CRM- 80.5% vs. 62.8%, p = 0.019).

Conclusion: These important findings clearly show underestimated tumor extensions into the mesopancreas even in localized, primary resectable PDAC patients who are currently amenable for upfront resection. Synergistically to total mesorectal or mesocolic excision, which is applied to all stages of colorectal disease, MPE is justified in primary resectable patients as well. Therefore, MPE should be employed in all PDAC patients. Since the infiltration status of the mesopancreas was a significant factor for incomplete resection in primary resectable PDAC patients, neoadjuvant treatment options for must be discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大多数胰腺肿瘤切除术都必须考虑胰腺间质。
背景:在胰头导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的术前分期中,可切除性的解剖学特征是可能清除内侧血管丛。边缘可切除的PDAC患者,其浸润到肠系膜系统和/或动脉血管的风险增加,是新辅助治疗的候选者。然而,重新定义的病理分析显示,R1切除的背侧切缘风险相似。中胰腺切除术(MPE)的目的是确保背侧和腹侧切除边缘的完整性。胰腺间系膜(MP)的存在是不可避免的,因为胰腺是次级腹膜后的,背侧和腹侧的筋膜覆盖定义了胰腺周围腔室的解剖结构。目前尚不清楚是否只有高危PDAC患者才会浸润MP区,或者胰十二指肠切除术中MPE是否也适用于局部PDAC患者。方法:纳入行胰十二指肠切除术的患者。所有患者的CRM评估和MP分析均标准化。根据血管沟浸润情况(局限性疾病:LOC)对患者进行分组。LOC患者明显没有癌性浸润到内侧血管沟(真实+原发可切除)。结果:共纳入284例连续行胰十二指肠切除术的患者(169例LOC患者)。LOC患者的MP浸润率仍然很高,但与晚期PDAC患者相比显著降低(MP + 69.2% vs. 83.5%, p = 0.005)。在LOC患者中,背侧切除状态的CRM切除状态仍受MP浸润状态的显著影响(R0CRM- 80.5% vs. 62.8%, p = 0.019)。结论:这些重要的发现清楚地表明,即使在目前适合进行前期切除的局部原发性可切除PDAC患者中,肿瘤向中胰腺的扩展也被低估了。MPE与直肠或结肠系膜全切除术协同作用,适用于所有阶段的结直肠疾病,MPE在原发性可切除患者中也是合理的。因此,所有PDAC患者都应采用MPE。由于间胰腺浸润状况是原发性可切除PDAC患者切除不全的重要因素,因此必须讨论新辅助治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning-based radiomics analysis of PET imaging for early prediction of concurrent chemoradiotherapy response in stage II-III cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Metabolic targeting of pantothenate by medium chain fats in glioblastoma cells. Preliminary modeling of brain metastases in breast cancer: a neural network approach to risk factor analysis. Evaluation of the exposure-response relationship of pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: observational study protocol in real-world clinical practice. Long-term work ability, cognitive impairments and work-related concerns among young adult cancer survivors: a comparative analysis with healthy controls (AYA-LE study).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1