Effect of Hyaluronic Acid Mucoadhesives on Palatal Wound Healing and Postoperative Discomfort in Free Gingival Graft Surgery: A Clinical Trial.

Q3 Dentistry Frontiers in Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18502/fid.v21i42.16848
Parisa Nabiyi, Niloofar Jenabian, Sohrab Kazemi, Ali Akbar Moghadamnia, Seyed Ali Seyedmajidi
{"title":"Effect of Hyaluronic Acid Mucoadhesives on Palatal Wound Healing and Postoperative Discomfort in Free Gingival Graft Surgery: A Clinical Trial.","authors":"Parisa Nabiyi, Niloofar Jenabian, Sohrab Kazemi, Ali Akbar Moghadamnia, Seyed Ali Seyedmajidi","doi":"10.18502/fid.v21i42.16848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to assess the effect of hyaluronic acid (HA) mucoadhesives with two different concentrations on palatal epithelial wound healing and postoperative discomfort following free gingival graft (FGG) surgery. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> In this triple-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial, 39 patients undergoing FGG surgery were randomly allocated to three groups (N=13). Following palatal graft harvesting, the two experimental groups received mucoadhesives containing 0.8% and 0.2% HA, while the control group received mucoadhesives without HA. In all groups, the donor site was protected with periodontal dressing. Epithelization, color match, contour, and distortion were assessed at 3, 7, 14, 21, and 42 days, postoperatively using the Landry's healing index and modified Manchester Scar Proforma (mMSP) index. Pain level and response to thermal stimuli were evaluated after 3, 7, 14, and 21 days using a visual analog scale (VAS). Data were analyzed by the Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, Friedman, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (alpha=0.05). <b>Results:</b> Significant differences were observed in the mMSP index scores among the groups at 3, 7, 14, and 42 days, favoring HA groups (P<0.05). The Landry's healing index score was significantly higher in 0.8% HA group on day 21 (P=0.023), compared to the control group. No significant differences were found in pain score or thermal stimulus responses among the groups (P>0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Mucoadhesives containing HA were found to enhance palatal wound healing, leading to improved outcomes in terms of epithelization, color match, contour, and distortion reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":12445,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dentistry","volume":"21 ","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v21i42.16848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effect of hyaluronic acid (HA) mucoadhesives with two different concentrations on palatal epithelial wound healing and postoperative discomfort following free gingival graft (FGG) surgery. Materials and Methods: In this triple-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial, 39 patients undergoing FGG surgery were randomly allocated to three groups (N=13). Following palatal graft harvesting, the two experimental groups received mucoadhesives containing 0.8% and 0.2% HA, while the control group received mucoadhesives without HA. In all groups, the donor site was protected with periodontal dressing. Epithelization, color match, contour, and distortion were assessed at 3, 7, 14, 21, and 42 days, postoperatively using the Landry's healing index and modified Manchester Scar Proforma (mMSP) index. Pain level and response to thermal stimuli were evaluated after 3, 7, 14, and 21 days using a visual analog scale (VAS). Data were analyzed by the Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, Friedman, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (alpha=0.05). Results: Significant differences were observed in the mMSP index scores among the groups at 3, 7, 14, and 42 days, favoring HA groups (P<0.05). The Landry's healing index score was significantly higher in 0.8% HA group on day 21 (P=0.023), compared to the control group. No significant differences were found in pain score or thermal stimulus responses among the groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Mucoadhesives containing HA were found to enhance palatal wound healing, leading to improved outcomes in terms of epithelization, color match, contour, and distortion reduction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
透明质酸粘合剂对游离龈移植手术中腭部伤口愈合和术后不适的影响:临床试验。
目的:本研究旨在评估两种不同浓度透明质酸(HA)黏合剂对游离龈移植术后腭上皮伤口愈合和术后不适的影响。材料与方法:本研究为三盲、随机、对照临床试验,将39例FGG手术患者随机分为3组(N=13)。取腭移植物后,实验组和对照组分别给予含0.8%和0.2% HA的黏合剂,对照组给予不含HA的黏合剂。在所有组中,用牙周敷料保护供体部位。术后3、7、14、21和42天,使用Landry愈合指数和改良的Manchester Scar Proforma (mMSP)指数评估上皮、颜色匹配、轮廓和变形。在3、7、14和21天后用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛水平和对热刺激的反应。数据分析采用卡方检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验、Mann-Whitney检验、Friedman检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验(alpha=0.05)。结果:3、7、14、42 d各组mMSP指数评分差异均有统计学意义,HA组优于HA组(P0.05)。结论:发现含有透明质酸的粘膜粘接剂可促进腭创面愈合,在上皮、颜色匹配、轮廓和变形减少方面改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Dentistry-General Dentistry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Influence of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fill Composite Resin to Cut and Uncut Enamel: An In-Vitro Study. Multidisciplinary Management of a Permanent Central Incisor Fused with a Supernumerary Tooth: A Case Report. Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Eyelets Bonded with a Self-Adhesive Moisture-Tolerant Resin Cement Under Isolation and with Blood and Saliva Contamination. Assessing the Impact of Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Oral Health Related Quality of Life: Non-Randomized Clinical Trial. Comparative Efficacy of MadaJet®XL and Conventional Injection Technique for Primary Maxillary Molar Local Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1