Investigation of Mechanical Properties, Shade, and Water Sorption/Solubility of Commercial Composite Resins.

Q3 Dentistry Frontiers in Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18502/fid.v21i43.16849
Golnaz Tayebi, Sajjad Omidian, Sara Abtahi, Alireza Ranjbar Hassani, Yasaman Sherafatmand
{"title":"Investigation of Mechanical Properties, Shade, and Water Sorption/Solubility of Commercial Composite Resins.","authors":"Golnaz Tayebi, Sajjad Omidian, Sara Abtahi, Alireza Ranjbar Hassani, Yasaman Sherafatmand","doi":"10.18502/fid.v21i43.16849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Assessment of mechanical properties of composite resins is important since they can affect the clinical performance and longevity of restorations. This study aimed to assess and compare different properties of dental composite resins available in the market. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> In this comparative study, samples of four different dental composite resins (Edge COM, Saremco, FGM, and Kulzer) were tested according to ISO 4049:2019 guidelines. Flexural strength (by using a universal testing machine), depth of cure (using the ISO 4049 scrape technique), radiopacity (with aluminum step wedge), water sorption/solubility (by using immersion and drying cycles), and shade (by using Vita Easy Shade) of the samples were assessed. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (alpha=0.05). <b>Results:</b> No significant difference was found in flexural strength among the four groups (P>0.05). The depth of cure of FGM was significantly higher than that of other groups (P<0.05). Solubility and water sorption were the highest in Kulzer, and the lowest in Edge COM (P<0.05). All tested composites met the necessary radiopacity standards for precise radiographic diagnosis; radiopacity was higher in Saremco and FGM groups. None of the composite resins matched the reference A2 shade. <b>Conclusion:</b> Although no significant difference was found in flexural strength of the tested composites, they had differences in other properties. Edge COM exhibited high flexural strength, while Saremco had optimal radiopacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12445,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dentistry","volume":"21 ","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v21i43.16849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Assessment of mechanical properties of composite resins is important since they can affect the clinical performance and longevity of restorations. This study aimed to assess and compare different properties of dental composite resins available in the market. Materials and Methods: In this comparative study, samples of four different dental composite resins (Edge COM, Saremco, FGM, and Kulzer) were tested according to ISO 4049:2019 guidelines. Flexural strength (by using a universal testing machine), depth of cure (using the ISO 4049 scrape technique), radiopacity (with aluminum step wedge), water sorption/solubility (by using immersion and drying cycles), and shade (by using Vita Easy Shade) of the samples were assessed. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (alpha=0.05). Results: No significant difference was found in flexural strength among the four groups (P>0.05). The depth of cure of FGM was significantly higher than that of other groups (P<0.05). Solubility and water sorption were the highest in Kulzer, and the lowest in Edge COM (P<0.05). All tested composites met the necessary radiopacity standards for precise radiographic diagnosis; radiopacity was higher in Saremco and FGM groups. None of the composite resins matched the reference A2 shade. Conclusion: Although no significant difference was found in flexural strength of the tested composites, they had differences in other properties. Edge COM exhibited high flexural strength, while Saremco had optimal radiopacity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商用复合树脂的机械性能、遮光性和吸水性/溶解性研究。
目的:对复合树脂的力学性能进行评估是非常重要的,因为它们会影响修复体的临床性能和寿命。本研究旨在评估和比较市场上可获得的牙科复合树脂的不同性能。材料和方法:在这项比较研究中,根据ISO 4049:2019指南对四种不同牙科复合树脂(Edge COM、Saremco、FGM和Kulzer)的样品进行了测试。对样品的抗弯强度(使用通用试验机)、固化深度(使用ISO 4049刮擦技术)、不透光性(使用铝阶梯楔形)、吸水/溶解度(使用浸泡和干燥循环)和遮光性(使用Vita Easy shade)进行了评估。数据分析采用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验(α =0.05)。结果:四组患者抗折强度差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。FGM的固化深度明显高于其他组(p结论:虽然测试复合材料的抗弯强度没有显著差异,但在其他性能上存在差异。Edge COM具有较高的抗弯强度,而Saremco具有最佳的放射线透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Dentistry-General Dentistry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Influence of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fill Composite Resin to Cut and Uncut Enamel: An In-Vitro Study. Multidisciplinary Management of a Permanent Central Incisor Fused with a Supernumerary Tooth: A Case Report. Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Eyelets Bonded with a Self-Adhesive Moisture-Tolerant Resin Cement Under Isolation and with Blood and Saliva Contamination. Assessing the Impact of Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Oral Health Related Quality of Life: Non-Randomized Clinical Trial. Comparative Efficacy of MadaJet®XL and Conventional Injection Technique for Primary Maxillary Molar Local Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1